Waters, James (2013): The effect of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act on industrial innovation – evidence from patenting of stem cell technologies.
This is the latest version of this item.
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_47530.pdf Download (840kB) | Preview |
Abstract
This paper assesses how financial regulation, in the form of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (SOX), affects industrial innovation. We describe the decision faced by an investor considering an innovative project before, at the time of, and subsequent to SOX. SOX is shown to create a real option value for investment delay through its short term hike and medium term diminution in uncertainty, and we calculate how implementation parameters impact on delay and subsequent innovation. To test our model’s implications, we examine patenting in stem cell technologies from 2001 to 2009, introducing two methods of endogenously detecting changes in patenting rates. We find a post-SOX dip in patenting consistent with our model, and no long term effect on innovation. We reject US government funding cuts to human embryonic stem cell research as a cause of the observed behaviour, as well as five other sets of explanations.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | The effect of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act on industrial innovation – evidence from patenting of stem cell technologies |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | Sarbanes-Oxley; investment; innovation; patents |
Subjects: | K - Law and Economics > K2 - Regulation and Business Law O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O3 - Innovation ; Research and Development ; Technological Change ; Intellectual Property Rights > O31 - Innovation and Invention: Processes and Incentives D - Microeconomics > D9 - Intertemporal Choice > D92 - Intertemporal Firm Choice, Investment, Capacity, and Financing |
Item ID: | 47530 |
Depositing User: | James Waters |
Date Deposited: | 11 Jun 2013 00:32 |
Last Modified: | 28 Sep 2019 07:31 |
References: | Ahmed, A., McAnally, M., Rasmussen, S. and Weaver, C. (2010) How costly is the Sarbanes Oxley Act? Evidence on the effects of the Act on corporate profitability, Journal of Corporate Finance, 16, 352-69. Akhigbe, A. and Martin, A. (2008) In fluence of disclosure and governance on risk of US financial services firms following Sarbanes-Oxley, Journal of Banking & Finance, 32, 2124-35. Akhigbe, A., Martin, A. and Newman, M. (2008) Risk shifts following Sarbanes-Oxley: Influences of Disclosure and Governance, The Financial Review, 43, 383-401. Akhigbe, A., Martin, A. and Newman, M. (2010) Information Asymmetry Determinants of Sarbanes-Oxley Wealth Effects, Financial Management, pp. 1253-72. Archibugi, D., Filippetti, A. and Frenz, M. (2013) Economic crisis and innovation: Is destruction prevailing over accumulation?, Research Policy, 42, 302-14. Ashbaugh-Skaife, H., Collins, D., Kinney, W. and LaFond, R. (2009) The Effect of SOX Internal Control Deficiencies on Firm Risk and Cost of Equity, Journal of Accounting Research, 47, 1-43. Bargeron, L., Lehn, K. and Zutter, C. (2010) Sarbanes-Oxley and Corporate Risk-Taking, Journal of Accounting and Economics, 49, 34-52. Biotechnology Industry Organization (2006) BIO Issues Statement On Anticipated Changes to Sarbanes-Oxley Implementation, Downloaded from http://www.bio.org/media/press-release/bio-issues-statement-anticipated-changes-sarbanes-oxley-implementation. Biotechnology Industry Organization (2007a) Biotech Research and Development Will Benefit from Sarbanes-Oxley Changes, Downloaded from http://www.bio.org/media/press-release/biotech-research-and-development-will-benefit-sarbanes-oxley-changes. Biotechnology Industry Organization (2007b) Greenwood to Congress: Proposed Sarbanes-Oxley Reforms, Downloaded from http://www.bio.org/media/press-release/greenwood-congress-proposed-sarbanes-oxley-reforms. Biotechnology Industry Organization (2012) BIO Lauds Signing of JOBS Act into Law, Downloaded from http://www.bio.org/media/press-release/bio-lauds-signing-jobs-act-law. Blundell, R., Griffith, R. and Van Reenen, J. (1995) Dynamic Count Data Models of Technological Innovation, Economic Journal, 105, 333-44. Cheng, M., Dhaliwal, D. and Zhang, Y. (2013) Does investment efficiency improve after the disclosure of material weaknesses in internal control over financial reporting?, Journal of Accounting and Economics, 56, 1-18. Chhaochharia, V. and Grinstein, Y. (2007) Corporate Governance and Firm Value: The Impact of the 2002 Governance Rules, Journal of Finance, 62, 1789-825. Cohen, D., Dey, A. and Lys, T. (2013) Corporate Governance Reform and Executive Incentives: Implications for Investments and Risk-Taking, Contemporary Accounting Research, accepted article. Doidge, C., Karolyi, A. and Stulz, R. (2009) Has New York become less competitive in global markets? Evaluating foreign listing choices over time, Journal of Financial Economics, 91, 253-77. Engel, E., Hayes, R. and Wang, X. (2007) The Sarbanes-Oxley Act and Firms Going Private Decisions, Journal of Accounting and Economics, 44, 116-45. Gao, F., Wu, J. and Zimmerman, J. (2009) Unintended Consequences of Granting Small Firms Exemptions from Securities Regulation: Evidence from the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, Journal of Accounting Research, 47, 459-506. Hall, B. (2002) The financing of research and development, Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 18, 35-51. Hamilton, J. (1994) Time Series Analysis, Princeton University Press: Princeton. Hartman, T. (2007) The cost of being public in the era of Sarbanes-Oxley, Tech. rep., Foley & Lardner LLP. Jain, P., Kim, J.-C. and Rezaee, Z. (2008) The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and Market Liquidity, The Financial Review, 43, 361-82. Kalelkar, R. and Nwaeze, E. (2011) Sarbanes-Oxley Act and the quality of earnings and accruals: Market-based evidence, Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 30, 275-94. Kamar, E., Karaca-Mandic, P. and Talley, E. (2007) Sarbanes-Oxleys Effects on Small Firms: What is the Evidence?, USC CLEO Research Paper C07-9, University of Southern California Law School. Kang, Q., Liu, Q. and Qi, R. (2010) The Sarbanes-Oxley Act and Corporate Investment: A Structural Assessment, Journal of Financial Economics, 96, 291-305. Leuz, C., Triantis, A. andWang, T. (2008) Why Do Firms Go Dark? Causes and Economic Consequences of Voluntary SEC Deregistrations, Journal of Accounting and Economics, 45, 181-208. Li, H., Pincus, M. and Rego, S. (2008) Market Reaction to Events Surrounding the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and Earnings Management, Journal of Law and Economics, 51, 111-34. Linck, J., Netter, J. and Yang, T. (2009) The Effects and Unintended Consequences of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act on the Supply and Demand for Directors, Review of Financial Studies, 22, 3287-328. Litvak, K. (2007) Sarbanes-Oxley and the Cross-Listing Premium, Michigan Law Review, 105, 1857-98. Lysaght, M., Jaklenec, A. and Deweerd, E. (2008) Great Expectations: Private Sector Activity in Tissue Engineering, Regenerative Medicine, and Stem Cell Therapeutics, Tissue Engineering: Part A, 14, 305-15. Millar, J. and Bowen, B. (2011) Small and large firm regulatory costs: the case of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, Corporate Governance, 11, 161-70. Paunov, C. (2012) The global crisis and firms' investments in innovation, Research Policy, 41, 24-35. R Development Core Team (2009) R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing, R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria, http://www.R-project.org. Salter, B. (2005) The global politics of human embryonic stem cell science, Global Biopolitics Research Group Working Paper 2, University of East Anglia. Sarbanes-Oxley (2002) Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, Public Law 107-204, 107th Cong., 30 July 2002. Singer, Z. and You, H. (2011) The Effect of Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act on Earnings Quality, Journal of Accounting, Auditing & Finance, 26, 556-89. United States White House (2001) Embryonic Stem Cell Research. White House Fact Sheet., Downloaded from http://georgewbush-whitehouse.archives.gov/news/releases/2001/08/20010809-1.html. USPTO (2013) USPTO Patent Full-Text and Image Database, downloaded from http://patft.uspto.gov/. Wintoki, M. (2007) Corporate Boards and Regulation: The Effect of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act and the Exchange Listing Requirements on Firm Value, Journal of Corporate Finance, 13, 229-50. Zhang, I. (2007) Economic consequences of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, Journal of Accounting and Economics, 44, 74-115. Zucchini, W. and MacDonald, I. (2009) Hidden Markov Models for Time Series: An Introduction Using R, CRC Press: Florida. |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/47530 |
Available Versions of this Item
-
The effect of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act on innovation. (deposited 12 Jan 2011 21:11)
- The effect of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act on industrial innovation – evidence from patenting of stem cell technologies. (deposited 11 Jun 2013 00:32) [Currently Displayed]