Valadkhani, Abbas and Worthington, Andrew (2006): Assessing the Research Performance of Australian Universities. Published in: Global Business & Economics Anthology , Vol. 2, (2006): pp. 557-566.
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_50388.pdf Download (93kB) | Preview |
Abstract
This paper identifies new classifications of Australian universities based on their total and per-academic staff research outputs using the data for the period 1998-2002. We define research performance in terms of audited numbers of PhD completions, publications and grants (in accordance with rules established by the Department of Education, Science and Training). Our analysis indicates that (a) the highest achievers consists of the seven Group of Eight (Go8) universities; (b) the top-three research performers are the Universities of Melbourne, Sydney and Queensland in terms of total research performance and the Universities of Melbourne, Adelaide and Western Australia in per academic staff terms.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | Assessing the Research Performance of Australian Universities |
English Title: | Assessing the Research Performance of Australian Universities |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | Higher education, Hierarchical cluster analysis, Research performance, Factor analysis |
Subjects: | A - General Economics and Teaching > A1 - General Economics > A11 - Role of Economics ; Role of Economists ; Market for Economists A - General Economics and Teaching > A1 - General Economics > A19 - Other C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C6 - Mathematical Methods ; Programming Models ; Mathematical and Simulation Modeling > C63 - Computational Techniques ; Simulation Modeling I - Health, Education, and Welfare > I2 - Education and Research Institutions > I29 - Other |
Item ID: | 50388 |
Depositing User: | Professor Abbas Valadkhani |
Date Deposited: | 06 Oct 2013 05:58 |
Last Modified: | 26 Sep 2019 23:28 |
References: | Abbott, M and Doucouliagos, C., “The Efficiency of Australian Universities: A Data Envelopment Analysis”, Economics of Education Review, Vol. 22, No. 1, 2003, pp. 89-97. Abbott, M. and Doucouliagos, H., “Research Output of Australian Universities”, Education Economics, Vol. 12, No. 3, 2004, pp. 251-65. Aitkin, D., “Measuring the Things We Value Most”, Australian Financial Review, 29 November, 2004, p. 35 Athanassopoulos, A. and Shale, E., “Assessing the Comparative Efficiency of Higher Education Institutions in the UK by Means of Data Envelopment Analysis”, Education Economics, Vol. 5, No. 2, 1997, pp. 117–134. Bowden, R., “Fantasy Higher Education: University and College League Tables”, Quality in Higher Education, Vol. 6, No. 1, 2000, pp 41-60. Coelli, T., Assessing the Performance of Australian Universities Using Data Envelopment Analysis, mimeo (Centre for Efficiency and Productivity Analysis, University of New England, 1996). Department of Education, Science and Training, Building University Diversity, 2005 http://www.dest.gov.au/sectors/higher_education/policy_issues_reviews/reviews/building_diversity/building_university_diversity.htm (Accessed 1 November 2005) Department of Education, Training and Youth Affairs, The Characteristics and Performance of Higher Education Institutions, Occasional Paper Series 1A 98, (Commonwealth of Australia, Canberra, 1998). Dodd, T., “Another High Score for ANU”, Australian Financial Review, 4 December, 2004, p. 16. Filinov, N.B. and Ruchkina, S., “The Ranking of Higher Education Institutions in Russia: Some Methodological Problems”, Higher Education in Europe, Vol. XXVII, No. 4, 2002, pp. 407-421. Glass, J. C., McKillop, D.G. and O’Rourke, G., “A Cost Indirect Evaluation of Productivity Change in UK Universities”, Journal of Productivity Analysis, Vol. 10, No. 2, 1998, pp. 153–175. Hair, J.F, Anderson, T.E., Tatham, R. L. and Black, W.C., Multivariate data analysis, 5th edition, (Prentice-Hall, New Jersey, 1998). Illing, D., “Research Elites Win Top Spots”, The Australian, 24 November, 2004, p. 23. Johnes, G. & Johnes, J., “Research Funding and Performance in UK University Departments of Economics: a Frontier Analysis”, Economics of Education Review, Vol. 14, No. 3, 1995, pp. 301–314. Ng, Y. C. & Li, S. K., “Measuring the Research Performance of Chinese Higher Education Institutions: an Application of Data Envelopment Analysis”, Education Economics, Vol. 8, No. 2, 2000, pp. 140–156. Perry, L., “Fear of Teaching-Only Stigma”, The Australian, 27 April, 2005, p. 30 Pomfret, R. and Wang, L.C., “Evaluating the Research Output of Australian Universities”, Australian Economic Papers, Vol. 42, No. 4, 2003, pp. 418-41. Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Academic Ranking of World Universities, 2003, <http://www.sjtu.edu.cn/>, Accessed April 2004. Times Higher Education Supplement, World University Rankings <http://www.thes.co.uk/>, Accessed April 2004. Williams, R. and Van Dyke, N., The international standing of Australian universities, Melbourne institute of applied economic and social research, (University of Melbourne, Melbourne, 2004). Worthington, A. C., “An Empirical Survey of Frontier Efficiency Measurement Techniques in Education”, Education Economics, Vol. 9, No. 3, 2001, pp. 245–265. Yonezawa, A., Izuma, N. and Tetsuo K., “University Rankings in Japan”, Higher Education in Europe, Vol. XXVII. No. 4, 2002, pp. 373-382. |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/50388 |