Grammatikos, Theoharry and Papanikolaou, Nikolaos I. (2013): What lies behind the “too-small-to-survive” banks? Published in: Luxembourg School of Finance Research Working Paper Series No. 13-12 (November 2013)
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_51431.pdf Download (322kB) | Preview |
Abstract
It is a common place that during financial crises, like the one started in 2007, authorities provide substantial financial support to some problem banks, whilst at the same time let several others to go bankrupt. Is this happening because some particular banks are considered important and big enough to save, whereas some others are perceived as being ‘Too-Small-To-Survive’? Is the size of banks the fundamental factor that makes authorities to treat them differently, or it is also that some banks perform poorly and are not capable of withstanding some considerable shocks whatsoever? Our study provides concrete answers to these questions thus filling part of the void in the existing literature. A short- and a long-run positive relationship between size and performance is documented regardless of the level of bank soundness (healthy vs. failed and assisted banks) under scrutiny. Importantly, we pose and lend support to the ‘Too-Small-To-Survive’ hypothesis according to which the impact of bank performance on failure probability strongly depends on size. Evidence shows that authorities tend not to save banks whose size is below some specific threshold.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | What lies behind the “too-small-to-survive” banks? |
English Title: | What lies behind the “too-small-to-survive” banks? |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | CAMEL ratings; financial crisis; bank size; ‘Too-Small-To-Survive’ banks |
Subjects: | C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C2 - Single Equation Models ; Single Variables > C23 - Panel Data Models ; Spatio-temporal Models D - Microeconomics > D0 - General > D02 - Institutions: Design, Formation, Operations, and Impact G - Financial Economics > G0 - General > G01 - Financial Crises G - Financial Economics > G2 - Financial Institutions and Services > G21 - Banks ; Depository Institutions ; Micro Finance Institutions ; Mortgages |
Item ID: | 51431 |
Depositing User: | Dr Nikolaos Papanikolaou |
Date Deposited: | 16 Nov 2013 18:37 |
Last Modified: | 30 Sep 2019 12:35 |
References: | Adrian, T., Shin, H.S., 2010. Liquidity and leverage. Journal of Financial Intermediation 19, 418-437. Berger, A.N., Bouwman, C.H.S., 2013. How does capital affect bank performance during financial crises? Journal of Financial Economics 109, 146-176. Berger, A.N., Humphrey, D.B., 1991. The dominance of inefficiencies over scale and product mix economies in banking. Journal of Monetary Economics 28, 117-148. Berger, A.N., Humphrey, D.B., 1997. Efficiency of financial institutions: international survey and directions for future research. European Journal of Operational Research 98, 175-212. Berger, A.N., Miller, N.H., Petersen, M.A., Rajan, R.G., Stein, J.C., 2005. Does function follow organizational form? Evidence from the lending practices of large and small banks. Journal of Financial Economics 76, 237-269. Bertay, A.C., Demirguc-Kunt, A., Huizinga, H., 2013. Do we need big banks? Evidence on performance, strategy and market discipline. Journal of Financial Intermediation, forthcoming. Boyd, J.H., Runkle, D.E., 1993. Size performance of banking firms: Testing the predictions of theory. Journal of Monetary Economics 31, 47-67. Brissimis, S.N., Delis, M.D., Papanikolaou, N.I., 2008. Exploring the nexus between banking sector reform and performance: Evidence from newly acceded EU countries. Journal of Banking and Finance 32, 2674-2683. Buch, C.M., Koch, C.T., Koetter, M., 2013. Do banks benefit from internationalization? Revisiting the market power-risk nexus. Review of Finance 17, 1401-1435. Carter, D.A., McNulty, J.E., 2005. Deregulation, technological change, and the business-lending performance of large and small banks. Journal of Banking and Finance 29, 1113-1130. Coelli, T., Rao, D.S.P., O’Donnell, C.C., Battese, G.E., 2005. An introduction to efficiency and productivity analysis. Springer: New York. Cornett, M.M, McNutt, J.J., Strahan, P.E., Tehranian, H., 2011. Liquidity risk management and credit supply in the financial crisis. Journal of Financial Economics 101, 297-312. De Nicoló, G., 2000. Size, charter value and risk in banking: An international perspective. Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (U.S.), International Finance Discussion Papers 689. DeYoung, R., 2003. De novo bank exit. Journal of Money, Credit, and Banking 35, 711-728. DeYoung, R., Hasan, I., 1998. The performance of de novo commercial banks. Journal of Banking and Finance 22, 565-587. DeYoung, R., Hunter, W.C., Udell, G.F., 2004. The past, present, and probable future for community banks. Journal of Financial Services Research 25, 85-133. Demsetz, R.S., Strahan, P.E., 1997. Diversification, size, and risk at Bank Holding Companies. Journal of Money, Credit and Banking 29, 300-313. Galloway, T.M., Winson, B.L., Roden, D.M., 1997. Banks’ changing incentives and opportunities for risk taking. Journal of Banking and Finance 21, 509-527. Gong, N., Jones, K.D., 2010. Monitoring, bailouts, and penalties: An integrated framework of government policies to manage the Too Big To Fail Problem. Available at http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1663619 Goodhart, C.A.E., Huang, H., 2005. The lender of last resort. Journal of Banking and Finance 29, 1059-1082. Gujarati, D.N., 1995. Basic Econometrics. New York: McGraw-Hill. Hakenes, H., Schnabel, I., 2010. Banks without parachutes: Competitive effects of government bail-out policies. Journal of Financial Stability 6, 156-168. Hansen, B.E., 1999. Threshold effects in non-dynamic panels: Estimation, testing, and inference. Journal of Econometrics 93, 345-368. Hausman, J.A., 1978. Specification tests in econometrics. Econometrica 46, 1251-1272. Huang, X., Zhou, H., Zhu, H., 2009. A framework for assessing the systemic risk of major financial institutions. Journal of Banking and Finance 33, 2036-2049. Iannotta, G., Giacomo, N., Sironi, A., 2007. Ownership structure, risk and performance in the European banking industry. Journal of Banking and Finance 31, 2127-2149. Lane, W., Looney, S., Wansley, J., 1986. An application of the Cox proportional hazards model to bank failure. Journal of Banking and Finance 10, 511-531. Leary, M.T., 2009. Bank loan supply, lender choice, and corporate capital structure. The Journal of Finance 64, 1143-1185. O’Hara, M., Shaw,W., 1990. Deposit insurance and wealth effects: the value of being ‘too big to fail’. Journal of Finance 45, 1587-1600. Papanikolaou, N.I., Wolff, C.P., 2013. The role of on- and off-balance-sheet leverage of banks in the late 2000s crisis. Luxembourg School of Finance Working Paper Series. Porter, M.E., 1979. How competitive forces shape strategy. Harvard Business Review 57, 137-145. Patro, D.K., Qi, M., Sun, X., 2013. A simple indicator of systemic risk. Journal of Financial Stability 9, 105-116. Rime, B., Stiroh, K. J., 2003. The performance of universal banks: evidence from Switzerland. Journal of Banking and Finance 27, 2121-2150. |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/51431 |