Liquidity Issues in Indian Sovereign Bond Market

Nath, Golaka (2013): Liquidity Issues in Indian Sovereign Bond Market.

Abstract

Liquidity is one of the most important factors after credit risk that affects the bond yields. The paper uses various measures of liquidity to understand their determinants in Indian sovereign bond market. The Liquidity measured by parameters like Turnover Ratio and Amihud Illiquidity Indicator show that these parameters not only have instantaneous relationship with bond yield but contemporaneous relationship with themselves. Impact Cost is not found to have any explanatory power. Financial crisis had marginal impact on the Indian sovereign bond market. It functioned well during the crisis period without much deterioration in general market liquidity condition as RBI injected large amount of liquidity to the system within a limited time period to ensure stability in the financial markets in India. However, the notion of flight to safety was evident as traders started investing largely in Government bonds shunning credit products as the credit quality in general started to dip. This was duly supported by large issuances of Government bonds. The study also finds that the electronic order matching system for government bonds has been successful in improving liquidity and reducing volatility in the market.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: liquidity, liquidity premium, bond yield, Indian Sovereign Bonds, Impact Cost, Turnover Ratio, NDS-OM, Liquidity Adjustment Facility
• Subjects: C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C5 - Econometric Modeling > C58 - Financial Econometrics; E - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics > E4 - Money and Interest Rates > E43 - Interest Rates: Determination, Term Structure, and Effects; E - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics > E4 - Money and Interest Rates > E44 - Financial Markets and the Macroeconomy; G - Financial Economics > G1 - General Financial Markets > G12 - Asset Pricing ; Trading Volume ; Bond Interest Rates

References

Amato, J. D., and Remolona, E. M.(2003) "The Credit Spread Puzzle." The BIS Quarterly Review, 22 , 51-64.

Amihud, Y. (2002) "Illiquidity and Stock Returns: Cross-Section and Time-Series Effects." Journal of Financial Markets, 5 , 31-56.

Amihud,Y and Mendelson, H (1987) “Trading Mechanisms and Stock Returns: An Empirical Investigation”, Journal of Finance, Vol. 42, no. 3, 533-553.

Amihud,Y, Mendelson, H and Pedersen, L H,(2005), “Liquidity and Asset Pries”, Foundations and Trends in Finance, Vol. 1, no. 4, 269-364.

Bernanke, B. S., and M. Gertler.(1989) "Agency Costs, NetWorth, and Business Fluctuations." American Economic Review, 79 , 14-31.

Bernanke, B. S., and C. S. Lown.(1991), "The Credit Crunch." Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, February , 205-239.

Chakravarty, S., and A. Sarkar.(1999) "Liquidity in U.S. Fixed Income Markets: A Comparison of the Bid-Ask Spread in Corporate, Government and Municipal Bond Markets." Federal Reserve Bank Of New York, Staff Report, 73.

Duffee, G.(1998) "The Relation between Treasury Yields and Corporate Bond Yield Spreads." Journal of Finance, 53 , 2225-2241.

Fleming, M. (2001), “Measuring Treasury Market Liquidity”, Federal Reserve Bank of New York Staff Report, No. 133.

International Monetary Fund, (2007), “What is Global Liquidity?” in World Economic Outlook, April 2007, Washington, D.C.

Mohanty, M S (2002), “Improving liquidity in government bond markets: what can be done?” BIS Papers No 11 - The Development of Bond Markets in Emerging Economies, June-July 2002

Mohan R (2008), Global Financial Crisis: Causes, Impact, Policy Responses and Lessons, http://rbidocs.rbi.org.in/rdocs/Speeches/PDFs/IIBISSApril212009.pdf

Rueffer, R., Stracca, L., (2006), “What is Global Excess Liquidity, and Does it Matter”; ECB Working Paper no. 696.