Alfano, Maria Rosaria and Baraldi, Anna Laura and Papagni, Erasmo (2014): Electoral Systems and Corruption: the Effect of the Proportionality Degree.
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_53138.pdf Download (466kB) | Preview |
Abstract
This work provides a parametric and semi-parametric analysis of the relationship between the proportionality degree of an electoral system and corruption. This allows us to properly consider mixed electoral systems alongside the two traditional ones, proportional and plurality. Results show that a reduction in the proportionality degree within the same proportional system is not beneficial in fighting corruption because it weakens the monitoring power of opponents (their representativeness reduces) without the introduction of the voters’ monitoring. On the contrary, mixed rules allow both monitors to exercise their power to induce politicians to avoid corrupt behaviour. Increasing plurality elements into mixed systems is beneficial only up to certain proportionality degrees, after which the corresponding level of corruption begins to grow. Therefore, for governors who want to adopt mixed electoral systems, the choice of their proportionality degree becomes fundamental.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | Electoral Systems and Corruption: the Effect of the Proportionality Degree |
English Title: | Electoral Systems and Corruption: the Effect of the Proportionality Degree |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | Electoral Systems, Corruption, Proportionality degree |
Subjects: | C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C2 - Single Equation Models ; Single Variables > C23 - Panel Data Models ; Spatio-temporal Models D - Microeconomics > D7 - Analysis of Collective Decision-Making > D72 - Political Processes: Rent-Seeking, Lobbying, Elections, Legislatures, and Voting Behavior |
Item ID: | 53138 |
Depositing User: | Anna Laura Baraldi |
Date Deposited: | 25 Jan 2014 13:43 |
Last Modified: | 29 Sep 2019 02:55 |
References: | Abdiweli M. Ali, Hodan S. Isse, (2003), Determinants of Economic Corruption:A Cross-Country Comparison, Cato Journal, vol. 22, n.3, pp. 449-466. Ades, A., Di Tella, R. (1999), Rents, Competition, and Corruption, American Economic Review, vol. 89, n.4, pp. 982-92. Aidt, T.S., (2003), Economic Analysis of Corruption: A Survey, in The Economic Journal, vol. 113, pp. 632-652. Anckar, C., Akademi, A. (2001), Effects of electoral systems. A study of 80 countries. Working Paper presented at the SNS Seminar in Stockholm. Baltagi, B. H., Li D.,(2002), Series Estimation of Partially Linear Panel Data Models with Fixed Effects, Annals of Economics and Finance, 3, pp. 103-116. Bardhan, P., Yang, T. (2004), Political Competition in Economic Perspective, Bureau for Research and Economic Analysis of Development, Working Paper 78. Benoit, K., (2000), Which Electoral Formula Is the Most Proportional? A New Look with New Evidence,Political Analysis,vol. 8,n. 4, pp. 381-388. Blais, A. (1988), The classification of electoral systems. European Journal of Political Research, vol. 16, pp. 99-110. Blondel, J.,(1969),An Introduction to Comparative Government. London: Weidenfeld and Nicholson. Blundell, R. e Bond, S. (1998), GMM Estimation with Persistent Panel Data: An ApplicationTo Production Functions, Institute for Fiscal Studies, Working Paper Series,n. 99/4. Boix, C. (2003), Democracy and Redistribution. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Bonaglia, F. de Macedo, J.B., Bussolo, M., (2001), How Globalization Improves Governance, Discussion Paper n. 2992, Centre for Economic Policy Research, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, Paris, France. Chang, E. C. C., Golden, M. (2007), Electoral systems, district magnitude and corruption, British Journal of Political Science, vol. 37, pp.115–137. Chang, E. C.C. (2005), Electoral Incentives for Political Corruption under Open-List Proportional Representation, Journal of Politics, vol. 67, n. 3, pp.716-30. de Haan, J. and H. Seldadyo (2005), The Determinants of Corruption: A Reinvestigation, unpublished paper prepared for the EPCS-2005 Conference Durham, England, 31 March–3 April 2005. de Haan, J. Sturm, J.E.(2005), Determinants of Long-term Growth: New Results Applying Roboust Estimation and Extreme Bounds, TWI Research Paper Seriesn. 12, Thurgauer Wirtschaftsinstitut, Universität Konstanz. Desbordes R.,Verardi V., (2012), Refitting the Kuznets Curve. Economics Letters, 116, pp. 258-261. Dollar D., Fisman R., Garri R.(1999), Are Women Really the Fairer Sex? Corruption and Women in Government, World Bank Working Paper Series,n. 4. Fisman, R. J. Gatti R., (2002), Decentralization and Corruption: Evidence across Countries, Journal of Public Economics, vol. 83, pp. 325-345. Forejohn, J. (1986), Incumbent performance and electoral control, Public Choice, vol. 50 pp. 5-25. Frechette, G. R. (2001), A Panel Data Analysis of the Time-Varying Determinants of Corruption, Paper presented at the EPCS. Gagliarducci, S., Nannicini, T.,Naticchioni, P. (2011), Electoral Rules and Politicians’ Behavior: A Micro Test, American Economic Journal: Economic Policy,vol. 3, n. 3, pp. 144-174. Gallagher, M. (1992), Comparing Proportional Representation Electoral Systems: Quotas, Thresholds, Paradoxesand Majorities, British Journal of Political Science,vol. 22, pp. 469-496. Gallagher, M. (1991), Proportionality, Disproportionality and Electoral Systems, Electoral Studiesvol. 10, n. 1, pp. 33-51. Gleditsch, N.P., Hegre, H. (1997), Peace and Democracy: Three levels of Analysis, Journal of Conflict Resolution, vol. 41, n. 2, pp. 283-310. Goetz, A. (2004), Political Cleaners: How Women are the New Anti-Corruption Force. Does the Evidence Wash?, available online at http://www.u4.no/document/showdoc. cfm?id=124. Golden, M. A., Chang E. C. (2001), Competitive Corruption: Factional Conflict and Political Malfeasance in Postwar Italian Christian Democracy, World Politics,vol. 53, n. 4, pp.588-622. Hall, R. E. Jones, C. I. (1999), Why do Some Countries Produce so much more Output per Worker than Others, Quarterly Journal of Economics, vol. 114, pp. 83-116. Huntington, S.P. (1968), Political Order in Changing Societies, New Haven: Yale University Press. Jain, A. K. (2001), Corruption: A Review, Journal of Economic Surveys vol. 15, n. 1, pp. 71–121. Kaufmann, D.Kraay, A., Mastruzzi, M. (1999), Governance Matters, World Bank Policy Research Working Paper, n. 2196. Knack, S., Azfar, O. (2003), Trade Intensity, Country Size and Corruption, Economics of Governance, vol. 4, pp. 1-18. Kostadinova, T. (2002), Do Mixed Electoral Systems Matter?: A Cross-National Analysis of their Effects in Eastern Europe. Electoral Studies vol.21, n.1, pp. 23-34. Kunicova, J. Rose-Ackerman, S. (2005), Electoral Rules and Constitutional Structures as Constraints on Corruption, British Journal of Political Science, vol. 35, n.4, pp.573–606. La Porta, R., Lopez-de-Silanes, F., Shleifer, A., Vishny, R.W. (1999), The Quality of Government, Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization, vol. 15, pp. 222-79. Lambsdorff, J. G. (2005), Consequences and Causes of Corruption: What do We Know from a Cross-Section of Countries?, University of Passau, Passau. Leff, N. H. (1964), Economic Development through Bureaucratic Corruption, The American Behavioral Scientist, vol. 8, n.3, pp. 8-14. Li Q., Racine J. S., (2007), Nonparametric Econometrics. Theory and Practice, Princeton University Press, Princeton. Libois F.,VerardiV., (2013) Semiparametric fixed-effects estimator, Stata Journal, 13, pp. 329-336. Lijphart, A. (1986), Degrees of Proportionality of Proportional Representation Formulas, In Electoral Laws and Their Political Consequences, ed. Bernard Grofman and Arend Lijphart. New York: Agathon Press. Lijphart, A. (1994), Electoral system and party systems: A study of twenty-seven democracies, 1945-1990. New York: Oxford University Press. Loosemore, J., Hanby V. (1971), The Theoretical Limits of Maximum Distortion: Some Analytic Expressions for Electoral Systems, British Journal of Political Science,vol. 1, pp. 467-477. Lui, F.T. (1985), An Equilibrium Queuing Model of Bribery, Journal of Political Economy, vol.93, n. 41, pp. 760-81. Marshall, M.G., Jaggers, K., (2002), Polity IV Project – Dataset Users’ Manual. Program Center for International Development and Conflict Management, University of Maryland, College Park (Manual). Mauro, P. (1995), Corruption and Growth, Quarterly Journal of Economics, vol. 110, n. 3, pp. 681-712. Mauro, P. (1998), Corruption and the Composition of Government Expenditure, Journal of Public Economics, vol. 69, n. 2, pp. 263-79. Moser, R.G. Scheiner, E. (2004), Mixed electoral systems and electoral system effects: controlled comparison and cross-national analysis, Electoral Studies, vol. 23, pp. 575-599. Myerson, R. (1993), Effectiveness of electoral systems for reducing government corruption: a game-theoretic approach, Games and Economic Behavior, vol. 5, n.1, pp. 118–32. Persson T., Tabellini G. (1999), The Size and Scope of Government:Comparative Politics with Rational Politicians, European Economic Review, vol. 43, n. 4-6, pp.699-735. Persson T., Tabellini G. (2000), Political Economics: Explaining Economic Policy, The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA. Persson, T., Tabellini, G. (2002), Political economics and public finance in Handbook of Public Economics, eds A. J. Auerbach, M. Feldstein, edition 1, vol. 3, chapter 24, pp. 1549-1659 Elsevier. Persson, T.Tabellini, G. (2003), The Economic Effects of Constitutions. The MIT Press, Cambridge,MA. Persson, T. Roland, G. Tabellini, G. (1997), Separation of Powers and Political Accountability, Quarterly Journal of Economics, vol. 112, n. 4, pp. 1163-1202. Persson, T., Tabellini, G., Trebbi, F. (2003), Electoral Rules and Corruption, in Journal of the European Economic Association, vol. 1, pp. 958-989. Powell, G.B., Vanberg, G.S. (2000), Election laws, dis-proportionality and median correspondence: Implications for two visions of democracy, British Journal of Political Science, vol. 30, pp. 383–411. Przeworski, A. Alvarez, M. Cheibub, J.A. Limongi F. (2000), Democracy and Development, Cambridge University Press,Cambridge. Raknerud, A.Hegre, H. (1997), The Hazard of War: Reassessing the Evidence for the Democratic Peace, Journal of Peace Research, vol. 34, n. 4, pp.385–404. Rose-Ackerman, (1999), S. Corruption and Government, Causes, Consequences and Reform, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK. Sala-i-Martin, X. (1997), I Just Run Four Million Regressions, NBER working paper, n. 6252. Schjølset, A. (2008), Institutional Variance of the Democratic Peace, 1816–2002: Electoral, Executive, and Federal Systems in Time and Space, University of Southern California, PhD thesis. Schumpeter, J. (1950), Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy. New York: Harper Torchbooks, 3rd edition. Shugart, M. Wattenberg, M. (2001), Mixed-Member Electoral Systems: The Best of Both Worlds?, Oxford University Press, Oxford. Sung, H. (2003), Fairer Sex or Fairer System? Gender and Corruption Revisited, Social Forces, vol. 82, n. 2, pp. 703-723. Tanzi, V. (1998), Corruption Around the World: Causes, Consequences, Scope and Cures. IMF Staff Papers, vol. 45 n. 4, pp. 559–94. Tavares, J. (2003), Does Foreign Aid Corrupt?, Economic Letters, vol. 79, pp. 99-106. Treisman, D. (2000), The Causes of Corruption: A Cross-national Study, Journal of Public Economics, vol. 76, pp. 399–57. Treisman, D. (2007), What Have We Learned About the Causes of Corruption from Ten Years of Cross-National Empirical Research?, Annual Review of Political Science, vol. 10, pp. 211-244. |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/53138 |