Chu, Angus C. and Ji, Lei (2012): Monetary policy and endogenous market structure in a Schumpeterian economy.
This is the latest version of this item.
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_53339.pdf Download (187kB) | Preview |
Abstract
In this study, we develop a monetary Schumpeterian growth model with endogenous market structure (EMS) to explore the effects of monetary policy on the number of firms, firm size, economic growth and social welfare. EMS leads to different results from previous studies in which market structure is exogenous and richer implications on transitional dynamics. In the short run, a higher nominal interest rate reduces the growth rates of innovation, output and consumption and also decreases firm size due to a reduction in labor supply. In the long run, an increase in the nominal interest rate reduces the equilibrium number of firms but has no steady-state effect on economic growth and firm size due to EMS. Although monetary policy has no long-run effect on economic growth, an increase in the nominal interest rate permanently reduces the levels of output, consumption and employment. Taking into account transition dynamics, we find that social welfare is decreasing in the nominal interest rate. Given that a zero nominal interest rate maximizes welfare, the Friedman rule is optimal in this economy.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | Monetary policy and endogenous market structure in a Schumpeterian economy |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | monetary policy; economic growth; R&D; endogenous market structure |
Subjects: | O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O3 - Innovation ; Research and Development ; Technological Change ; Intellectual Property Rights > O30 - General O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O4 - Economic Growth and Aggregate Productivity > O40 - General E - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics > E4 - Money and Interest Rates > E41 - Demand for Money |
Item ID: | 53339 |
Depositing User: | Prof. Angus C. Chu |
Date Deposited: | 02 Feb 2014 18:55 |
Last Modified: | 27 Sep 2019 13:03 |
References: | Aghion, P., and Howitt, P., 2005. Growth with quality-improving innovations: An integrated framework. In P. Aghion and S. Durlauf (eds.), Handbook of Economic Growth, Amsterdam: North-Holland, pp. 67-110. Aghion, P., and Howitt, P., 2008. The Economics of Growth. The MIT Press. Bernstein, J., and Nadiri, M., 1988. Interindustry R&D spillovers, rates of return, and production in high-tech industries. American Economic Review, 78, 429-434. Bernstein, J., and Nadiri, M., 1989. Research and development and intra-industry spillovers: An empirical application of dynamic duality. Review of Economic Studies, 56, 249-267. Bullard, J., 1999. Testing long-run monetary neutrality propositions: Lessons from the recent research. Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis Review, Nov, 57-77. Chu, A., and Cozzi, G., 2013. R&D and economic growth in a cash-in-advance economy. International Economic Review, forthcoming. Chu, A., and Lai, C., 2013. Money and the welfare cost of inflation in an R&D growth model. Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, 45, 233-249. Chu, A., Lai, C., and Liao, C., 2012. A tale of two growth engines: Interactive effects of monetary policy and intellectual property rights. MPRA Paper No. 40372. Cohen, W., and Klepper, S., 1996a. Firm size and the nature of innovation within industries: The case of process and product R&D. Review of Economics and Statistics, 78, 232-243. Cohen, W., and Klepper, S., 1996b. A reprise of size and R&D. Economic Journal, 106, 925-951. Dosi, G., 1988. Sources, procedures, and microeconomic effects of innovation. Journal of Economic Literature, 26, 1120-71. Dotsey, M., and Ireland, P., 1996. The welfare cost of inflation in general equilibrium. Journal of Monetary Economics, 37, 29-47. Etro, F., 2009. Endogenous Market Structures and the Macroeconomy. New York and Berlin: Springer. Evers, M., Niemann, S., and Schiffbauer, M., 2007. Inflation, investment composition and total factor productivity. University of Essex, Economics Discussion Papers No. 632. Fisher, M., and Seater, J., 1993. Long-run neutrality and superneutrality in an ARIMA framework. American Economic Review, 83, 402-415. Funk, P., and Kromen, B., 2010. Inflation and innovation-driven growth. The B.E. Journal of Macroeconomics (Topics), 10, Article 23. Gillman, M., and Kejak, M., 2005. Contrasting models of the effect of inflation on growth. Journal of Economic Surveys, 19, 113-136. Gomme, P., 1993. Money and growth revisited: Measuring the costs of inflation in an endogenous growth model. Journal of Monetary Economics, 32, 51-77. Ha, J., and Howitt, P., 2007. Accounting for trends in productivity and R&D: A Schumpeterian critique of semi-endogenous growth theory. Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, 39, 733-774. Howitt, P., 1999. Steady endogenous growth with population and R&D inputs growing. Journal of Political Economy, 107, 715-730. Jaffe, A., 1986. Technological opportunity and spillovers of R&D: Evidence from firms' patents, profits, and market value. American Economic Review, 76, 984-1001. King, R., and Watson, M., 1997. Testing long-run neutrality. Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond, 83, 69-101. Laincz, C., and Peretto, P., 2006. Scale effects in endogenous growth theory: An error of aggregation not specification. Journal of Economic Growth, 11, 263-288. Lucas, R., 1980. Equilibrium in a pure currency economy. Economic Inquiry, 18, 203-220. Marquis, M., and Reffett, K., 1994. New technology spillovers into the payment system. Economic Journal, 104, 1123-1138. Mino, K., 1997. Long-run effects of monetary expansion in a two-sector model of endogenous growth. Journal of Macroeconomics, 19, 635-655. Mulligan, C., and Sala-i-Martin, X., 1997. The optimum quantity of money: Theory and evidence. Journal of Money, Credit, and Banking, 29, 687-715. Peretto, P., 1996. Sunk costs, market structure, and growth. International Economic Review, 37, 895-923. Peretto, P., 1998. Technological change and population growth. Journal of Economic Growth, 3, 283-311. Peretto, P., 1999. Cost reduction, entry, and the interdependence of market structure and economic growth. Journal of Monetary Economics, 43, 173-195. Peretto, P., 2007. Corporate taxes, growth and welfare in a Schumpeterian economy. Journal of Economic Theory, 137, 353-382. Peretto, P., 2011. The growth and welfare effects of deficit-financed dividend tax cuts. Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, 43, 835-869. Peretto, P., 2013. From Smith to Schumpeter: A theory of take-off and convergence to sustained growth. ERID Working Paper No. 148. Peretto, P., and Seater, J., 2013. Factor-eliminating technological change. Journal of Monetary Economics, 60, 459-473. Santomero, A., and Seater, J., 1996. Alternative monies and the demand for media of exchange. Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, 28, 942-960. Segerstrom, P., 2000. The long-run growth effects of R&D subsidies. Journal of Economic Growth, 5, 277-305. Stockman, A., 1981. Anticipated inflation and the capital stock in a cash-in-advance economy. Journal of Monetary Economics, 8, 387-93. Tobin, J., 1965. Money and economic growth. Econometrica, 33, 671-684. Wang, P., and Yip, C., 1992. Alternative approaches to money and growth. Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, 24, 553-562. Wu, Y., and Zhang, J., 2001. The effects of inflation on the number of firms and firm size. Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, 33, 251-271. Young, A., 1998. Growth without scale effects. Journal of Political Economy, 106, 41-63. |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/53339 |
Available Versions of this Item
-
Monetary policy and endogenous market structure in a Schumpeterian economy. (deposited 06 Aug 2012 12:12)
- Monetary policy and endogenous market structure in a Schumpeterian economy. (deposited 02 Feb 2014 18:55) [Currently Displayed]