What Determines Firms’ Innovation in Eastern Europe and Central Asia

Afandi, Elvin and Kermani, Majid (2013): What Determines Firms’ Innovation in Eastern Europe and Central Asia.

Abstract

By employing a rich sample of firm-level data in seven Eastern Europe and Central Asian countries from Europe and Central Asia, our paper investigates core as well as some specific determinants of firm innovation. We find that the likelihood of engaging in innovation for a firm increases with its core socio-economic characteristics such as size, age, capacity utilization, domestic competition and foreign ownership. In addition to the estimates of these socio-economic covariates, the ultimate purpose of our study is to obtain more in-depth knowledge about the policy implacable factors for firm innovation that the countries could focus on. These policy-related factors are: (i) access to finance, (ii) human capital, and (iii) foreign trade. In this respect, our study finds that firm’s innovation increases with better financial inclusion, greater human capital and engagement in foreign trade. We argue that these analysis and results, coupled with inclusive and targeted policies, can be used to enrich the process of private sector innovation in the region’s countries.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: Firm innovation, access to finance, human capital, foreign trade
• Subjects: G - Financial Economics > G0 - General; J - Labor and Demographic Economics > J2 - Demand and Supply of Labor > J24 - Human Capital ; Skills ; Occupational Choice ; Labor Productivity; O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O3 - Innovation ; Research and Development ; Technological Change ; Intellectual Property Rights > O31 - Innovation and Invention: Processes and Incentives; P - Economic Systems > P3 - Socialist Institutions and Their Transitions > P33 - International Trade, Finance, Investment, Relations, and Aid

References

Aghion, P., Bloom, N., Blundell, R., Griffith, R., Howitt, P., 2005. Competition and innovation: An inverted-u relationship, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 120, 701– 728.

Aghion, P., Durlauf, D., 2005. Handbook of Economic Growth, Eds., Amsterdam: North-Holland Elsevier Publishers.

Almeida, R., Fernandes, A., 2008. Openness and Technological Innovations in Developing Countries: Evidence from Firm-Level Surveys, The Journal of Development Studies, 44, 701-727.

Baumol, W., 2002. The Free-Market Innovation Machine: Analyzing the Growth Miracle of Capitalism (Princeton University Press, Princeton).

Benfratello, L., Schiantarelli, F., Sembenello, A., 2006. Banks and Innovation: Microeconomic Evidence on Italian Firms, Boston College Working Paper 631.

Bogliacino, F., Cardona, S., 2010. The determinants of R&D Investment: the role of Cash flow and Capabilities, JRC-IPTS Working Papers on Corporate R&D and Innovation 2010-10.

Carreira, C., Silva, F., 2010. Financial constraints: Are there differences between manufacturing and services?, GEMF Working Papers 2010-16.

Cincer, M., Ravet, J., 2010. Financing constraints and R&D investments of large corporations in Europe and the USA. JRC-IPTS Working Papers on Corporate R&D and Innovation 2010-03.

Hall, B., Lerner, J., 2009. The Financing of R&D and Innovation, NBER Working Papers 15325.

La Porta, R., Lopez-de-Silanes, F., Shleifer, A., 2002. Government Ownership of Banks, Journal of Finance 57, 265-301.

Levine, R., Loayza, N., Beck, T., 2000. Financial Intermediation and Growth: Causality and Causes, Journal of Monetary Economics, 46, 31-77.

Maksimovic, V., Ayyagari, M., Demirguc, A., 2007. Firm Innovation in Emerging Markets: The Role of Governance and Finance, World Bank Policy Research Working Paper No. 4157.

Organization of Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD), 2005. Oslo Manual: Guidelines for Collecting and Interpreting Innovation Data (3rd edition).

Shleifer, A., 1998. State versus Private Ownership, Journal of Economic Perspectives, 12, 133-150.

Sutton, J., 2007. Quality, Trade and the Moving Window: The Globalization Process, The Economic Journal, 117, 469-498.