Erkoc, Taptuk Emre (2013): Estimating Economic Efficiencies of Public Sector Organisations with Stochastic Frontier Analysis: Evidence from Turkish Higher Education.
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_54101.pdf Download (265kB) | Preview |
Abstract
This paper investigates 53 public HEIs in Turkey between 2005 and 2010 including 5 full academic terms to estimate both their cost frontier and inefficiencies. The initial findings of six different models imply that Turkish universities perform quite well concerning their overall efficiency values albeit with variations among them. Besides, within this five-year time span, Turkish universities have not shown any improvement in their efficiencies based on Battese and Coelli's (1992) time variant model. In addition to that, the determinants of inefficiencies in Turkish HEIs are dependent upon certain variables. The size of HEIs is seen to be the most influential factor behind inefficiencies referring to the fact that small size universities are expected to experience relatively higher efficiency results. Subsequently, the impact of load factor is as important as the size effect. The negative coefficient implies that, universities with higher load factor demonstrate better efficiency performances. Moreover, age of the university, the percentage of foreign students, percentage of full-time faculty and having medical school are the other variables reducing efficiency in HEIs based on the only one model. Percentage of professors does not have any influence on the inefficiencies according to the both two models.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | Estimating Economic Efficiencies of Public Sector Organisations with Stochastic Frontier Analysis: Evidence from Turkish Higher Education |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | Panel Data Models, Stochastic Frontier Analysis, Cost efficiency, Universities |
Subjects: | C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C2 - Single Equation Models ; Single Variables > C23 - Panel Data Models ; Spatio-temporal Models C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C2 - Single Equation Models ; Single Variables > C24 - Truncated and Censored Models ; Switching Regression Models ; Threshold Regression Models D - Microeconomics > D2 - Production and Organizations > D24 - Production ; Cost ; Capital ; Capital, Total Factor, and Multifactor Productivity ; Capacity I - Health, Education, and Welfare > I2 - Education and Research Institutions > I23 - Higher Education ; Research Institutions |
Item ID: | 54101 |
Depositing User: | Mr Taptuk Emre Erkoc |
Date Deposited: | 05 Mar 2014 01:26 |
Last Modified: | 02 Oct 2019 06:51 |
References: | Dennis Aigner, CAL Lovell, and Peter Schmidt. Formulation and es- timation of stochastic frontier production function models. Journal of econometrics, 6(1):21{37, 1977. George Edward Battese and Tim J Coelli. Frontier production functions, technical efficiency and panel data: with application to paddy farmers in india. Journal of productivity analysis, 3(1-2):153{169, 1992. James MacGill Buchanan and Gordon Tullock. The calculus of consent: Logical foundations of constitutional democracy, volume 100. University of Michigan Press, 1965. Zara Daghbashyan. The economic efficiency of swedish higher education institutions. CESIS, KTH Royal Institute of Technology, 2011. Anthony Downs. A theory of bureaucracy. The American Economic Review, 55(1/2):439{446, 1965. Taptuk Emre Erkoc. Mapping out economics of non pro�t sector in Turkish context. European Journal of Economic and Political Studies, 4(2), 2011. Mehdi Farsi, Massimo Filippini, and Michael Kuenzle. Unobserved heterogeneity in stochastic cost frontier models: an application to swiss nursing homes. Applied economics, 37(18):2127{2141, 2005. William Greene. Reconsidering heterogeneity in panel data estimators of the stochastic frontier model. Journal of Econometrics, 126(2):269{ 303, 2005. William H Greene. Frontier production functions. Handbook of applied econometrics, 2:81{166, 1997. Hooshang Izadi, Geraint Johnes, Reza Oskrochi, and Robert Crouchley. Stochastic frontier estimation of a CES cost function: the case of higher education in Britain. Economics of Education Review, 21(1):63{71, 2002. Geraint Johnes and Jill Johnes. Higher education institutions' costs and efficiency: Taking the decomposition a further step. Economics of Education Review, 28(1):107{113, 2009. Mohd Zaini Abd Karim and Chanta Jhantasana. Cost efficiency and profitability in Thailand's life insurance industry: a stochastic cost frontier approach. International Journal of Applied Econometrics and Quantitative Studies, 2(4):19{36, 2005. Raymond J Kopp and W Erwin Diewert. The decomposition of frontier cost function deviations into measures of technical and allocative efficiency. Journal of Econometrics, 19(2):319{331, 1982. Subal C Kumbhakar and CA Lovell. Stochastic Frontier Analysis. Cam- bridge University Press, Cambridge, 2000. Yaw M Mensah and Robert Werner. Cost efficiency and financial flexibility in institutions of higher education. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 22(4):293{323, 2003. William A Niskanen. Bureaucracy and representative government. Transaction Books, 1971. John Robst. Cost efficiency in public higher education institutions. Journal of Higher Education, pages 730{750, 2001. Philip Andrew Stevens. The determinants of economic efficiency in English and Welsh universities. National Institute of Economic and Social Research London, 2001. Oliver E Williamson. The economics of discretionary behavior: Managerial objectives in a theory of the �rm. Markham Publishing Company Chicago, Illinois, 1967. Xia Zhao. Essays on the Bayesian estimation of stochastic cost frontier. PhD thesis, Louisiana State University, 2006. |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/54101 |