Marjit, Sugata and Santra, Sattwik and Hati, Koushik Kumar (2014): Does inequality affect the consumption patterns of the poor? – The role of “status seeking” behaviour.
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_54118.pdf Download (887kB) | Preview |
Abstract
We consider a situation where the relatively ‘poor’ are concerned about their relative income status with respect to a relevant reference group. Such a concern is explicitly introduced in a utility function to study the consumption and saving behavior of the poor in terms of a static and dynamic model. The static model points toward a possible conflict between income based and nutrition-based measure of poverty. The dynamic model exhibits the possibility of a higher rate of accumulation coupled with an inadequate nutritional intake, relative to a situation where there is no such concern for status. Thus, growth with malnutrition may also imply a conflict between different measures of poverty. Both the models point toward a direct and negative relationship between inequality and share of nutritional consumption as reflected in the consumption of food. Finally the paper looks at the empirical relationship between inequality and consumption across districts within states of India. The hypotheses that inequality impacts consumption patterns via status effect cannot be rejected. In fact the impact seems to be significant across a number of the Indian states.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | Does inequality affect the consumption patterns of the poor? – The role of “status seeking” behaviour |
English Title: | Does inequality affect the consumption patterns of the poor? – The role of “status seeking” behaviour |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | Status; Consumption pattern; Inequality; Poverty; Growth; |
Subjects: | C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C1 - Econometric and Statistical Methods and Methodology: General > C13 - Estimation: General C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C1 - Econometric and Statistical Methods and Methodology: General > C14 - Semiparametric and Nonparametric Methods: General C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C5 - Econometric Modeling > C51 - Model Construction and Estimation D - Microeconomics > D1 - Household Behavior and Family Economics D - Microeconomics > D1 - Household Behavior and Family Economics > D12 - Consumer Economics: Empirical Analysis O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O4 - Economic Growth and Aggregate Productivity > O40 - General |
Item ID: | 54118 |
Depositing User: | sugata marjit |
Date Deposited: | 05 Mar 2014 01:40 |
Last Modified: | 26 Sep 2019 13:04 |
References: | Banerjee, A. V., & Duflo, E. (2011). Poor Economics: A Radical Rethinking of the Way to Fight Global Poverty. New York: PublicAffairs. Beath, J., & Fitzroy, F. (2010). Status, Hapiness and Relative Income. IZA Discussion Paper No. 2658 . Clark, A. E., & Oswald, A. J. (1996). Satisfaction and Comparison Income. Journal of Public Economics, LXI, 359–381. Cole, H. L., Mailath, G. J., & Postlewaite, A. (1992). Social Norms, Savings Behavior, and Growth. Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 100(6), 1092-1125. Corneo, G., & Jeanne, O. (2001). Status, the Distribution of Wealth, and Growth. Scandinavian Journal of Economics, Vol. 103(2), 283-293. Deaton, A., & Dreze, J. (2009). Food and Nutrition in India:Facts and interpretation. Economic & Political Weekly, 44(7), 42-65. Diener, E., Sandvik, E., Seidlitz, L., & Diener, M. (1993). The Relationship between Income and Subjective Well-Being: Relative or Absolute? Social Indicators Research, XXVIII, 195–223. Easterlin, R. A. (1974). Does Economic Growth Improve the Human Lot? Some Empirical Evidence. In P. A. David, & M. W. Reder, Nations and Households in Economic Growth: Essays in Honor of Moses Abramowitz. New York: NY: Academic Press. Easterlin, R. A. (1995). Will Raising the Incomes of All Increase the Happiness of All? Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, XXVII, 35–48. Easterlin, R. A. (2001). Income and Happiness: Towards a Unified Theory. Economic Journal, CXI, 465–484. Fafchamps, M., & Shilpi, F. (2008). Subjective welfare, isolation, and relative consumption. Journal of Development Economics, Vol. 86(1), 43-60. Ferrer-i-Carbonell, A. (2005). Income and Well-Being: An Empirical Analysis of the Comparison Income Effect. Journal of Public Economics, LXXXIX, 997–1019. Frank, R. H. (1985). The Demand for Unobservable and Other Nonpositional Goods. American Economic Review, Vol. 75(No. 1), 101-116. Ghiglino, C., & Goyal, S. (2008). Keeping up with the neighbors: social interaction in a market economy. ournal of the European Economic Association, 8(1), 90-119. Government of India. (2011-12). Economic Survey. Griffiths, P., & Bentley, M. (2001). 'The Dual Burden of Nutrition Transition for Women in India:A Comparision of the Rural Poor and Urban Elite in Andhra Pradesh'. The Journal of Nutrition, 131(10), 2692-2700. Heltberg, R. (2009). Malnutrition, poverty, and economic growth. Health Economics, Vol.18(1). Hopkins, E., & Kornienko, T. (2010). Which Inequality? The Inequality of Endowments Versus the Inequality of Rewards. American Economic Journal: Microeconomics, 2(3), 106-137. Kanbur, R., & Tuomala, M. (2010). Relativity, Inequality and Optimal Nonlinear Income Taxation. Working Paper, Cornell University. Ku, H., & Salmon, T. C. (2009). Incentive Effects of Inequality and Economic Development. Mimeo, Florida State University. Luttmer, E. F. (2005). Neighbors as Negatives: Relative Earnings and Well Beings. Quarterly Journal of Economics, Vol. 120(3), 963-1002. Marjit, S. (2012). Conflicting Measures of Poverty and Inadequate Saving by the Poor. Working Papers UNU-WIDER Research Paper , World Institute for Development Economic Research (UNU-WIDER). Marjit, S., & Roychowdhury, P. (2012). Inequality, status effects and trade. MPRA Paper 40225, University Library of Munich, Germany. McBride, M. (2001). Relative-Income Effects on Subjective Well-Being in the Cross-Section. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, XLV, 251–278. Moav, O., & Neeman, Z. (2012). Saving Rates and Poverty: The Role of Conspicuous Consumption and Human Capital. The Economic Journal, 122(563), 933-956. Mujcic, R., & Frijters, P. (2013). Economic choices and status: measuring preferences for income rank. Oxford Economic Papers, 65(1), 47-73. Mukherjee, A., Rajaraman, D., & Swaminathan, H. (2010). Economic Development, Inequality and Malnutrition in India. IIM Bangalore Working Paper. Patnaik, U. (2007). Neoliberalism and Rural Poverty in India. Economic and Political, Vol. 42(30), 3132-3150. Radhakrishna, R., & Ravi, C. (2004). Malnutrition in India: Trends and Determinants. Economic and Political Weekly, 30(7), 671-676. Ray, D., & Robson, A. (2012). Status, Intertemporal Choice, and Risk-Taking. Econometrica, Vol. 80(4), 1505-1531. Robinson, P. M. (1988). Root-n-consistent semiparametric regression. Econometrica, vol. 56, 931-954. Robson, A. (1992). Status, the Distribution of Wealth, Private and Social Attitudes to Risk. Econometrica, Vol. 60(4), 837-857. Senik, C. (2004). Relativizing Relative Income. Manuscript, DELTA and University Paris-IV Sorbonne. Sivanathan, N., & Petit, N. (2010). Protecting the self through consumption of Status goods. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, Vol. 46, 1238-1244. Svedberg, P. (2008). Why Malnutrition in Shining India Persists. 4th Annual Conference on Economic Growth and Development. ISI Delhi. Van de Stadt, H., Kapteyn, A., & Van de Geer, S. (1985). The Relativity of Utility: Evidence from Panel Data. Review of Economics and Statistics, LXVII, 179-187. Veblen, T. (1902). The Theory of the Leisure Class: An Economic Study of Institutions. New York: Macmillan. Veenhoven, R. (1991). Is Happiness Relative? Social Indicators Research, XXIV, 1-24. |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/54118 |