Nasar, Asim and Aleem, Muhammad Usman and Herani, Gobind M. (2010): Training Strategically Improves Human Resource (HR) Productivity in Academic Institutions of Pakistan. Published in: Indus Journal of Management & Social Sciences No. 4(2) (31 December 2010): pp. 93-102.
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_54141.pdf Download (557kB) | Preview |
Abstract
The main aim of this research study is to establish a relationship between training and development with the human resource productivity of academic institutions in Pakistan. To contributes the proactive approach towards training sessions that leads towards the positive perception and image building of institutions. The probabilistic sampling technique has been used to complete the survey in degree awarding institutions based in Karachi. The empirical analysis comprise of two core variables i.e. HR productivity and training & development which shows the highly significant results along with the reliability measurement scale. This study enlighten that training and development also leave positive impact upon the intervening variables i.e. employee knowledge, career, morale and institution image, perception and productivity.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | Training Strategically Improves Human Resource (HR) Productivity in Academic Institutions of Pakistan |
English Title: | Training Strategically Improves Human Resource (HR) Productivity in Academic Institutions of Pakistan |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | HR productivity, Training and Development, Productivity of Academic Institutions. |
Subjects: | M - Business Administration and Business Economics ; Marketing ; Accounting ; Personnel Economics > M5 - Personnel Economics > M51 - Firm Employment Decisions ; Promotions M - Business Administration and Business Economics ; Marketing ; Accounting ; Personnel Economics > M5 - Personnel Economics > M53 - Training P - Economic Systems > P3 - Socialist Institutions and Their Transitions > P36 - Consumer Economics ; Health ; Education and Training ; Welfare, Income, Wealth, and Poverty |
Item ID: | 54141 |
Depositing User: | Gobind M. Herani |
Date Deposited: | 09 Mar 2014 23:44 |
Last Modified: | 26 Sep 2019 15:42 |
References: | Handy, C. 1990. The Age of Unreason. London: Arrow Books Publisher. Jerling, K. 1999: Education, Training and Development in Organisations. Pretoria: Kagiso Publishers. Landale, A. (Ed) (1999) Gower Handbook of Training and Development Third Edition, Gower. Fink S.L., and Longenecker C. O. (1998). Training as a Performance Appraisal Improvement Strategy. Career Dev. Int. 3(6):243-251. Horne H, Pierce A (1996). A Practical Guide to Staff Development and Appraisal in Schools. London: Kogan. Danielson, C. 2001. New Trends in Teacher Evaluation. Educational Leadership, 58:12-15. Donaldson, C. and S. Tobbe. 2000. Teacher Evaluation: A Self-directed, Inquiry-based Approach. Thrust for Educational Leadership, 29:30-32. Duke, D. L. 1995. The Move to Reform Teacher Evaluation. In: Duke DL (ed.). Teacher Evaluation Policy: From Accountability to Professional Development. Albany: State University of New York Press. Mullins, L.J. 1996. Management and Organisational Behaviour. London: Pitman Publishing. Murdock, G. 2000. Introducing a Teacher-Supportive Evaluation System. ETL Journal: An International Journal for Teachers of English Speakers of other Languages, 54:54-64. Trethowan, D. 1991. Managing with Appraisal: Achieving Quality in Schools through Performance Management. London: Paul Chapman Publishing Ltd. Wilson, J.P. and Western, S. 2001. Performance Appraisal: An Obstacle to Training and Development? Career Development International, 6:93-100. |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/54141 |