Chung, Heejung (2007): Do countries matter? Explaining the variation in the use of numerical flexibility arrangements across European companies using a Multi-level model.
Download (622kB) | Preview
Do countries matter, especially compared to other aspects that affect the flexibility behaviours of companies? Many studies on the labour market assume that there are country differences, cross-national variances, and that it is a crucial factor in explaining the actual practices of the labour market by individuals and companies. The supposition is that although there are variations across countries, the behaviour of actors within the country is rather homogeneous. Thus, due to country level characteristics, the actors within the country are seen to act similarly. This is due to the fact that individuals and individual companies are restricted within the country due to their institutional frame, cultural and social boundaries. However, this does not necessarily mean that actors are completely restricted within these boundaries. This becomes more evident when we are dealing with labour market flexibility options, for this can be developed (in companies or perhaps by individuals) as a coping mechanism to overcome the restrictions of society. This paper asks the questions, do countries matter, and to what extent it does matter and how it matters. It addresses this issue by first comparing the variance of each level under examination, that is, the country, sector and company level, through the use of a multi-level random effects model. The examination of the variance of each level will allow us to see to which extent countries matter. Also this model allows us to see how factors that explain the flexibility behaviours of companies show different effects across countries to answer the question how countries matter in an exploratory manner. The issue of flexibility is addressed uniquely in this paper in two aspects. Unlike many of the previous studies on this issue, this paper uses a broader definition of flexibility, thus, it perceives labour market flexibility as a method used for the needs of workers as well as those of employers or companies. In other words, as companies facilitate their adaptation to business cycles through labour market flexibility, workers adapt to life cycles through it. Based on this definition, flexibility practices used within companies can be measured two dimensionally, on one side its overall level and another to whom it is (more) geared towards. Also, unlike studies that focus on one or few specific arrangements, this paper does not examine various flexibility options as separate entities. It examines the practices as a whole, i.e. the use and the combination of various arrangements in achieving numerical flexibility. The data used here is the European Survey of Working-Time and Work-life Balance (ESWT) from the European Foundation of the Improvement of Living and Working Conditions. This survey covers 21000 establishments in 21 EU member states for the years 2004/2005. The outcomes of this study show that being within a certain country is indeed an important factor in explaining the differences between companies in taking up flexibility options. However, the variance between companies within a country is much larger, especially when considering the flexibility options that are geared towards the needs of employers. Compared to country and company levels there are small differences between sectors within countries. Of the company level characteristics, size of the company, worker composition, industrial relation aspects, and variations in work loads were important determinants of the flexibility practices within companies. Also it seems that the effects of explanatory variables are different across the European countries. For flexibility options that are used for company’s production needs being within certain sectors have different implications across countries. For flexibility options that are used for worker’s work-life balance needs, industrial relations aspects of the company, thus the existence of working time agreements and employee representatives have different implications across countries. There seems to be a division with the EU 15 and the new accession countries in these effects where the relationship as well as the strength of the effect changes. There are some evidence that companies may use work-life balance options as incentives to recruit and maintain their skilled work force, as we can see the countries where labour force demand is strong the effect of proportion of skilled workers in the provision of flexibility options for workers is stronger, and visa versa. Also collective agreements on working time may help the use of various flexibility option for both worker’s needs as well as company’s needs, especially in countries where flexibility options are not widely and frequently used.
|Item Type:||MPRA Paper|
|Institution:||Flexicurity Research Team, Tilburg University|
|Original Title:||Do countries matter? Explaining the variation in the use of numerical flexibility arrangements across European companies using a Multi-level model|
|Keywords:||labour market flexibility; company level practice; multi-level model; random effects model; work-life balance; working time; numerical flexibility; cross-national comparative study; European Establishment Survey on Working Time (ESWT); public sector; working time agreements; country level variance|
|Subjects:||J - Labor and Demographic Economics > J5 - Labor-Management Relations, Trade Unions, and Collective Bargaining > J50 - General
C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C3 - Multiple or Simultaneous Equation Models ; Multiple Variables > C30 - General
P - Economic Systems > P5 - Comparative Economic Systems > P51 - Comparative Analysis of Economic Systems
J - Labor and Demographic Economics > J2 - Demand and Supply of Labor > J20 - General
J - Labor and Demographic Economics > J0 - General > J01 - Labor Economics: General
|Depositing User:||Heejung Chung|
|Date Deposited:||26. Oct 2007|
|Last Modified:||17. Feb 2013 13:59|
Anxo, D., Fagan, C., Letablier, M., Perraudin, C., and Smith, M. (2007a) Part-time work in European Companies-Establishment Survey on Working Time 2004-2005. European Foundation for the Improvement of Living and Working Conditions. Office for Official Publications of the European Communities. Luxembourg. Anxo, D., Fagan, C., Letablier, M., Perraudin, C., and Smith, M. (2007b) Parental Leave in European Companies- Establishment Survey on Working Time and Work-Life Balance arrangements 2004-2005. European Foundation for the Improvement of Living and Working Conditions, Office for Official Publications of the European Communities. Luxembourg. Anxo, D., Boulin, J., Fagan, C., Cebrián, I., Keuzenkamp, S., Klammer, U., Klenner, C., Moreno, G., and Toharía, L. (2006) Working time options over the life course: New work patterns and company strategies. European Foundation for the Improvement of Living and Working Conditions, Dublin. Anxo, D., Boulin, J., Cebrián, I., Fagan, C., Keuzenkamp, S., Klammer, U., Klenner, C., Moreno, G., and Toharía, L. (2005) Working time options over the life course: Changing social security structures. European Foundation for the Improvement of Living and Working Conditions, Dublin. Atkinson, J. (1984) Flexibility, Uncertainty and Manpower Management, IMS Report No.89, Institute of Manpower Studies, Brighton. Bekker, S. and Chung, H. (2007) "Restructuring organisations while striving for flexicurity: a European perspective" Paper for the AgirE Seminar ‘Social Consequences of Restructuring’, Essen, 28-29 June 2007. Bonoli, G. (1997) “Classifying Welfare States: a Two-dimension Approach” Journal of Social Policy, 26(3) 351~372. Cambridge University Press. Chung, H. (2007) “Flexibility for whom? A new approach in examining labour market flexibility focusing on European companies” in Flexicurity and Beyond Henning Jørgensen & Per Kongshøj Madsen (eds.):, Copenhagen: DJØF Publishing. Chung, H. Kerkhofs, M. and Ester, P. (2007) Working Time Flexibility in European Companies, European Foundation for the Improvement of Living and Working Conditions, Luxembourg, Office for Official Publications of European Communities. Chung, H. (2003) 노동시장정책과 사회보장제도의 관계: OECD 17개국 고용보호와 실업급여의 상관관계 중심으로, MSW dissertation, Yonsei University, Seoul. Summarized in Chung (2005) “Social Security and Labour Market Reform, Friends or Foes? Unemployment Benefit and Employment Protection Legislation of 17 OECD countries in the late 1990s”, unpublished manuscript. Crompton, R. (2001) “Gender Restructuring, Employment, and Caring” Social Politics 8 (3), Oxford University Press, Oxford. pp.266 ~ 286. Dolado, J.J, Garcia-Serrano, C., Jimeno-Serrano, J.F. (2001) “Drawing Lessons From The Boom of Temporary Jobs in Spain” Discussion Paper No.2884, Centre for Economic Policy Research. London, UK. Elmeskov, J., Martin, J.P., & Scarpetta, S. (1998) "Key Lessons for Labour Market Reforms: Evidence from OECD Countries' Experience". Economic Council of Sweden. IVA. Stockholm. pp. 1-39. Esping-Andersen, G., (2000) "Who is Harmed by Labour Market Regulations?: Quantitive Evidence". in Esping-Andersen, G., & Regini, M. (eds.). Why Deregulate Labour Markets? Oxford: Oxford University Press. pp. 66-98. ______ (1999) The Social Foundations of Post-industrial Economies, Oxford University Press, Oxford. ______ (1990) The Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism, Princeton University Press, Princeton. European Commission (2007) Joint Employment Report 2006/2007. European Commission (2007) Towards Common Principles of Flexicurity: More and better jobs through fl exibility and security. Directorate-General for Employment, Social Affairs and Equal Opportunities Unit D.2. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, 2007 European Commission (1998) The 1998 Employment Guidelines. Council Resolution of 15 December 1997 European Employment Taskforce (2003) Jobs, jobs, jobs. Creating more employment in Europe. Evans, J.M. (2002) “Work/Family Reconciliation, Gender Wage Equity and Occupational Segregation: The Role of Firms and Public Policy” in Canadian Public Policy-Analyse De Politiques, Volume 28, Supplement 1: S187~S216. Ferrera, M. (1993) Modelli di solidarietà, Il Mulino, Bologna. Gornick, J.C., Meyers, M.K., and Ross, K.E. (1998) “Public Policies and the Employment of Mothers: A Cross-National Study.” Social Science Quarterly, 29(1): 35~54. Hill, E. J., Hawkins, A.J., Ferris, M., Weitzman, M. (2001) “Finding an Extra Day a Week: The Positive Influence of Percieved Job Flexibility on Work and Family Life Balance” Family Relations, 2001 50(1). Blackwell publishing., pp.49~58. Houseman, S. N. (2001) “Why employers use flexible staffing arrangements: Evidence from an establishment survey”. Industrial and Labor Relations Review, Vol.55, No.1 (October 2001). Cornell University. Keune, M. (2006) “Collective bargaining and working time in Europe: an overview” in Keune, M. and Galgóczi, B. (eds) (2006) Collective bargaining on working time: Recent European experiences. ETUI, Brussels. Kümmerling, A. and Lehndorff, S. (2007) European Establishment Survey on Working Time and Work-Life Balance: Extended and unusual working hours. A Report for the European Foundation for the Improvement of Living and Working Condition. Layard, R., Nickell, S., & Jackman, R., (1991) Unemployment: Macroeconomic Performance and Labour Market. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Leber, U. and Wagner, A.(2007) Early and phased retirement in European companies: Establishment Survey on Working Time 2004-2005. European Foundation for the Improvement of Living and Working Conditions, Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, Luxembourg. Lewis, J. (1992) “Gender and the Development of Welfare Regimes.”Journal of European Social Policy 3: 159-73. MacDonald, M. (2004) “Gender, Labour Market and Welfare States”, Review of Income of Wealth, 50(3): 459~466. Messenger, J.C. (2004) “Working time at the enterprise level: business objectives, firms’ practices and workers’ preferences” in Messenger, J.C. (ed) (2004) Working-Time and Workers’ Preference in Industrialized Countries: Finding the Balance. Routledge, Oxon. Monastiriotis V. (2007), Labour Market Flexibility in UK Regions, 1979-1998, Area, 39 (3), pp.310-322 Muffels, R., Chung, H., Fouarge, D., Klammer, U., Luijkx, R., Manzoni, A., Thiel, A. and Wilthagen, T., (forthcoming) Flexibility and security over the life course. European Foundation for the Improvement of Living and Working Conditions, , Luxembourg, Office for Official Publications of the European Communities. Nickell, S. 1997. “Unemployment and Labour Market Ridigities: Europe versus North America”, Journal of Economic Perspectives, Vol.11 No.3 pp.55-74. OECD (2001) “Work and family life: How do they balance out?”, OECD Employment Outlook. OECD, Paris. ______ (1999) “Employment protection and labour market performance” OECD Employment Outlook, Paris. pp. 48~132. O’Reilly and Spee (1998) “The future regulation of work and welfare: time for a revised social and gender contract?” European Journal of Industrial Relations, 4(3), pp. 259~81. Ostner, I. and Lewis, J. (1995) “Gender and the Evolution of European Social Policies.” in Leibfried, S. and Pierson, P. (eds) European Social Policy Brookings: Washington D.C. Pissarides, C.A. (1990). Equilibrium Unemployment Theory, Oxford: Blackwell. Plantenga, J. and Remery, C. (2005) Reconciliation of work and private life: A comparative review of thirty European countries. Report for the European Commission. Polavieja, J.G.(2006) , ‘The incidence of temporary employment in advanced societies: Why is Spain different?’, European Sociological Review,Vol. 22, 2006, pp. 61–78. Pollert, A. (1988) “The Flexible Firm: Fixation or Fact” Work, Employment and Society. 2(3):281~316. Regini, M. (2000) “Between Deregulation and Social Pacts: The Responses of European Economies to Globalization” Politics and Society, Vol. 28 No.1, March 2000 pp.5~33. SAGE Publications. Reilly, P.A. (2001) Flexibility at Work: Balancing the interest of employer and employee. Gower Publishing Limited, Hampshire. ______ (1998) “Balancing Flexibility- Meeting the Interests of Employers and Employee” European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 7(1), 7~22. Psychology Press. Riedmann, A., Bielenski, H., Szczurowska, T., and Wagner, A. (2006) Working time and work-life balance in European companies: Establishment Survey on Working Time 2004-2005. European Foundation for the Improvement of Living and Working Conditions, Dublin. Rubery, J. and Grimshaw, D. (2003) The Organization of Employment: An International Perspective. Palgrave Macmillan, New York Scarpetta, S. 1996, "Assessing the Role of Labour Market Policies and Institutional Settings on Unemployment: A Cross-country Study". OECD Economic Studies. 2;26. pp. 43~82. Schmid, G. (2002) “Towards a theory of transitional labour markets” in Schmid and Gazier (eds) (2002) The Dynamics of Full Employment. Edward Elgar Publishing Limited, UK. Standing, G. (1999) Global Labour Flexibility:Seeking Distributive Justice. London: Macmillan Press LTD. Sainsbury, D. (1999) Gender and the Welfare State Regime. Oxford University Press, Oxford. Stier, H. and Lewin-Epstein, N. (2001) “Welfare Regimes, Family-Supportive Policies, and Women’s Employment along the Life-Course” American Journal of Sociology, 106(6): 1731~1760, University of Chicago.