Lechman, Ewa and Dominiak, Piotr and Okonowicz, Anna (2014): Fertility rebound and economic growth. New evidence for 18 countries over the period 1970-2011.
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_55104.pdf Download (643kB) | Preview |
Abstract
Long-run impact of economic growth on fertility trends is ambiguous and sensitive for in-time variations. Over last decades, economic growth has led in many countries to significant falls in total fertility rates. However, recently, in high-income economies a kind of “fertility rebound” is revealed [Goldstein 2009; Luci and Thevenon, 2011; Day 2012]. The concept of fertility rebound supports the hypothesis that reversal trends in total fertility rates are mainly attributed to economic growth. Our paper unveils the relationship between total fertility rate changes and economic growth in 18 selected countries with fertility rebound observed, over the period 1970-2011. We anticipate uncovering U-shaped impact of economic growth on total fertility rate. To report on the relationship we deploy longitudinal data analysis assuming non-linearity between examined variables. Data applied are exclusive derived from World Development Indicators 2013. Our main findings support the hypothesis on U-shaped relationship between total fertility rate and economic growth in analyzed countries in 1970-2011. Along with the previous we project the minimum level of GDP per capita when the fertility rebound takes place.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | Fertility rebound and economic growth. New evidence for 18 countries over the period 1970-2011. |
English Title: | Fertility rebound and economic growth. New evidence for 18 countries over the period 1970-2011. |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | fertility rate, fertility rebound, economic growth, panel data analysis. |
Subjects: | C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C2 - Single Equation Models ; Single Variables > C23 - Panel Data Models ; Spatio-temporal Models J - Labor and Demographic Economics > J0 - General J - Labor and Demographic Economics > J1 - Demographic Economics > J11 - Demographic Trends, Macroeconomic Effects, and Forecasts O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O1 - Economic Development O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O1 - Economic Development > O10 - General |
Item ID: | 55104 |
Depositing User: | Ewa Lechman |
Date Deposited: | 07 Apr 2014 06:37 |
Last Modified: | 27 Sep 2019 14:32 |
References: | 1. Adsera, A., & Menendez, A. [2009]. Fertility changes in Latin America in the context of economic uncertainty [No. 4019]. IZA discussion papers. 2. Bengtsson, T., Campbell, C., & Lee, J. Z. [2009]. Life under pressure: Mortality and living standards in Europe and Asia, 1700-1900. MIT Press Books, 1. 3. Butler D. [2004]. The fertility riddle. Nature 432. 4. Butz W.B., Ward M.P. [1979a]. The emergence of countrycyclical US fertility. The American Economic Review, 69 [3]. 5. Butz W.B., Ward M.P. [1979b]. Will US fertility remain low? A new economic interpretation. Population Development Review, 5. 6. Caldwell, J. C., & Schindlmayr, T. [2003]. Explanations of the fertility crisis in modern societies: A search for commonalities. Population Studies, 57[3]. 7. Doepke, M. [2004]. Accounting for fertility decline during the transition to growth. Journal of Economic growth, 9[3], 347-383. 8. Furuoka, F. [2009]. Looking for a J-shaped development-fertility relationship: Do advances in development really reverse fertility declines. Economics bulletin,29[4], 3067-3074. 9. Galor O., Weil, D.N. [1996]. The gender gap, fertility and growth. American Economic Review, 89, 150-154. 10. Galor, O., & Weil, D. N. [1999]. From Malthusian stagnation to modern growth[Vol. 2082]. 11. Goldstein, J. R., Sobotka, T., & Jasilioniene, A. [2009]. The End of “Lowest‐Low” Fertility?. Population and development review, 35[4], 663-699. 12. Hirschman, C. [1994]. Why fertility changes. Annual Review of Sociology, 20[1], 203-233. 13. Kreyenfeld, M. [2010]. Uncertainties in female employment careers and the postponement of parenthood in Germany. European Sociological Review, 26[3] 14. Klasen, S., & Lamanna, F. [2009]. The impact of gender inequality in education and employment on economic growth: new evidence for a panel of countries.Feminist Economics, 15[3], 91-132. 15. Kohler, H. P., Billari, F. C., & Ortega, J. A. [2002a]. The emergence of lowest-low fertility in Europe during the 1990s. Population and Development Review, 28. 16. Kohler, H.-P., Rodgers, J. L., & Christensen, K. [2002b]. Between nurture and nature: The shifting determinants of female fertility in Danish twin cohorts 1870–1968. Social Biology, 49. 17. Lee, R. [1990]. The demographic response to economic crisis in historical and contemporary populations. Population Bulletin of the United Nations, [29], 1-15. 18. Lee, R. [2003]. The demographic transition: three centuries of fundamental change. The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 17[4], 167-190. 19. Luci, A., & Thévenon, O. [2011]. Does economic development explain the fertility rebound in OECD countries?. Population & Sociétés, [481]. 20. Macunovich, D. J. [1996]. Relative income and price of time: Exploring their effects on US fertility and female labor force participation. Population and Development Review, 22 21. Martin, J. [2004]. The ultimate vote of confidence. Fertility rates and economic conditions in Australia, 1976–2000. Australian Social Policy 2002-2003, Commonwealth of Australia, Canberra, pp. 31-54. 22. Mills, M., & Blossfeld, H.-P. [2005]. Globalization, uncertainty and the early life course: A theoretical framework. In H.-P. Blossfeld, E. Klijzing, M. Mills, & K. Kurz [Eds.], Globalization, uncertainty and youth in society . London/New York: Routledge Advances in Sociology Series. 23. Mills, M., Rindfuss, R. R., McDonald, P., & te Velde, E. [2011]. Why do people postpone parenthood? Reasons and social policy incentives. Human Reproduction Update, 17[6] 24. Morgan, S. P., & Taylor, M. G. [2006]. Low fertility at the turn of the twenty-first century. Annual Review of Sociology, 32. 25. Myrskylä, M., Kohler, H. P., & Billari, F. C. [2009]. Advances in development reverse fertility declines. Nature, 460[7256], 741-743. 26. Neels, K. [2010]. Temporal variation in unemployment rates and their association with tempo and quantum of fertility: Some evidence for Belgium, France and the Netherlands. Paper presented at the Annual meeting of the Population Association of America, Dallas, 17 April OECD [2011], Doing better for families. OECD Publishing. 27. Ogawa, N. [2003]. Japan’s changing fertility mechanisms and its policy responses. Journal of Population Research, 20[1], 89-106. 28. Varvarigos, D. [2013]. A Theory of Demographic Transition and Fertility Rebound in the Process of Economic Development [No. 13/19]. 29. Rindfuss, R. R., Morgan, S. P., & Swicegood, G. [1988]. First births in America: Changes in the timing of parenthood [Vol. 2]. Univ of California Press. 30. Santow, G., & Bracher, M. [2001]. Deferment of the first birth and fluctuating fertility in Sweden. European Journal of Population, 17. 31. Sobotka, T., Billari, F. C., & Kohler, H.-P. [2010]. The return of late childbearing in developed countries: Causes, trends and implications. Vienna: Vienna Institute of Demography. 32. Sobotka, T., Skirbekk, V., & Philipov, D. [2011]. Economic recession and fertility in the developed world. Population and Development Review, 37[2], 267-306. |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/55104 |