Cebula, Richard and Toma, Michael (2000): The Effect of Classroom Games on Student Learning and Instructor Evaluations. Published in: Journal of Economics and Finance Education , Vol. 1, No. 2 (4 February 2002): pp. 1-10.
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_55404.pdf Download (105kB) | Preview |
Abstract
Assuming that instructors of economics are utility maximizers, they may find it useful to engage in classroom behavior that is likely to generate favorable outcomes with respect to student course evaluations. This is especially true if student course evaluations are used in assessing teaching effectiveness for tenure, promotion, and salary decisions. In this paper, we present evidence that the use of a classroom gaming exercise can raise instructor evaluations and enhance student learning outcomes. The tests are conducted in a framework that indirectly controls for grade inflation and considers student attendance and grade expectations as other sources of influence on instructor evaluation ratings.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | The Effect of Classroom Games on Student Learning and Instructor Evaluations |
English Title: | The Effect of Classroom Games on Student Learning and Instructor Evaluations |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | economic education; pedagogical approaches; classroom games; student performance; instructor evaluation |
Subjects: | A - General Economics and Teaching > A2 - Economic Education and Teaching of Economics > A22 - Undergraduate A - General Economics and Teaching > A2 - Economic Education and Teaching of Economics > A23 - Graduate A - General Economics and Teaching > A2 - Economic Education and Teaching of Economics > A29 - Other D - Microeconomics > D7 - Analysis of Collective Decision-Making > D72 - Political Processes: Rent-Seeking, Lobbying, Elections, Legislatures, and Voting Behavior D - Microeconomics > D7 - Analysis of Collective Decision-Making > D74 - Conflict ; Conflict Resolution ; Alliances ; Revolutions |
Item ID: | 55404 |
Depositing User: | Richard Cebula |
Date Deposited: | 19 Apr 2014 05:11 |
Last Modified: | 26 Sep 2019 12:29 |
References: | Aigner, D., and F. Thum. 1986. On student evaluation of teaching ability. Journal of Economic Education, 17(4): 243-265. Becker, W. 1975. The university professor as a utility maximizer and producer of learning, research and income. Journal of Human Resources, 10(1): 107-115. Bell, C. 1993. A non-computerized version of the William and Walker stock market experiment in a finance course. Journal of Economic Education, 24(4): 317-323. Chamberlin, E. 1948. An experimental imperfect market. Journal of Political Economy, 56(2): 95-108. Gigliotti, R., and F. Buchtel. 1990. Attribution bias and course evaluations. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82: 341-351. Holt, C. 1999. Teaching economics with classroom experiments. Southern Economic Journal, 65(3): 603-610. Park, K., and P. Kerr. 1990, Determinants of academic performance: A multinomial logit approach. Journal of Economic Education, 21(1): 101-111. |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/55404 |