Egbert, Henrik and Mengov, George (2009): Satisfaction and Disappointment in Consumer Choices. Published in: Journal of Psychological Investigations , Vol. 2009, No. 1 (1 March 2009): pp. 143-155.
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_55595.pdf Download (130kB) | Preview |
Abstract
This article investigates the role emotions play in economic decisions. In a computer based experiment our participants were the consumers of a fictitious service bearing resemblance to that offered by mobile phone operators. In each of 17 rounds a participant had to choose between retaining the current supplier or changing it with a competitor, based on information about expected and actual prices to be paid. We recorded participants’ self-assessed satisfaction or disappointment on a psychometric scale. Logit models are used to explain and predict individual choices based on prices, previous decisions, and emotions. Our findings show that prediction of choice is significantly better if information about the participants’ emotions is considered. We analyse how disrupted satisfaction treadmills make people feel disappointed at the face of financial discount and mildly satisfied when they have to pay more than expected.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | Satisfaction and Disappointment in Consumer Choices |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | consumer choices, emotion, satisfaction, disappointment, hedonic treadmill |
Subjects: | D - Microeconomics > D2 - Production and Organizations > D22 - Firm Behavior: Empirical Analysis D - Microeconomics > D4 - Market Structure, Pricing, and Design > D49 - Other M - Business Administration and Business Economics ; Marketing ; Accounting ; Personnel Economics > M3 - Marketing and Advertising > M37 - Advertising |
Item ID: | 55595 |
Depositing User: | Henrik Egbert |
Date Deposited: | 30 Apr 2014 00:06 |
Last Modified: | 26 Sep 2019 20:51 |
References: | Bosman, Ronald and Arno Riedl (2003) Emotions and economic shocks in a first-price auction. Tinbergen Institute Discussion Paper, TI2003-56/1. Camerer, Colin, George Loewenstein, and Drazen Prelec (2005) Neuroeconomics. How neuroscience can inform economics, Journal of Economic Literature, 43 (1): 9-64. Cliff, Norman (1959) Adverbs as multipliers, Psychological Review, 66 (1): 27-44. Elster, Jon (1998) Emotions and Economic Theory, Journal of Economic Literature, 36 (1): 47-74. Frey, Bruno S., and Alois Stutzer (2005) Happiness research: State and prospects, Review of Social Economy, 62 (2): 207-228. Gerganov, Encho (2007) Personal communication with the authors. Kahneman, Daniel (1999) Objective Happiness, in Daniel Kahneman, Ed Diener, and Norbert Schwartz (eds.) Well-Being: the Foundations of Hedonic Psychology, 3-25. New York: Russel Sage Foundation. Kim, Byung-Do, Robert C. Blattberg, and Peter E. Rossi (1995) Modeling the distribution of price sensitivity and implications for optimal retail pricing, Journal of Business and Economic Statistics, 13 (3): 291-303. Knutson, Brian and Richard Peterson (2005) Neurally reconstruction expected utility, Games and Economic Behavior, 52 (2): 305-315. Larsen, Randy J., and Barbara L. Fredrickson (1999) Measurement issues in emotion research, in Daniel Kahneman, Ed Diener, and Norbert Schwartz (eds.) Well-Being: the Foundations of Hedonic Psychology, 40-60. New York: Russel Sage Foundation. Lo, Andrew W., and Dmitry V. Repin (2002) The psychophysiology of real-time financial risk processing, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 14 (3): 323-339. Rieskamp, Jörg, Jerome R. Busemeyer and Barbara A. Mellers (2006). Extending the bounds of rationality: Evidence and theories of preferential choice, Journal of Economic Literature, 44 (3): 631-661. Smith, Kip and John Dickhaut (2005) Economics and emotions: Institutions matter, Games and Economic Behavior, 52 (2): 316-335. Trepel, Christopher, Craig R. Fox and Russell A. Poldrack (2005) Prospect theory on the brain? Towards a cognitive neuroscience of decision under risk, Cognitive Brain Research, 23 (1): 34-50. Zhang, Tao and David Zhang (2007) Agent-based simulation of consumer purchase decision-making and the decoy effect, Journal of Business Research, 60 (8): 912-922. |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/55595 |