Rohrbeck, Rene and Döhler, Mario and Arnold, Heinrich M. (2007): Combining spin-out and spin-in activities – the spin-along approach. Published in: ISPIM 2007 Conference: "Innovation for Growth: The Challenges for East & West" (17. June 2007): pp. 1-12.
Download (57kB) | Preview
After a long period of restructuring and outsourcing, companies are increasingly looking for new growth opportunities. Growth with existing prod-ucts or by expansion in new markets is limited. Therefore, companies are searching for ways to expand their activities in new businesses. A frequently used tool of multinational enterprises is corporate venturing. Within cor-porate venturing a further differentiation can be made in internal venturing and external venturing. Internal venturing promotes business ideas generated within the organization whereas external venturing promotes business ideas developed outside the company. Research has been able to show that venturing activi-ties both internal and external can create value. In this paper we explore a special case of venturing which we call the ‘spin-along approach’. It can be seen as a combination of internal and external ven-turing. In the spin-along approach, a company encourages its employees to take their business idea external and to found a company. Successful companies might later be bought back and integrated into the parent company or the paren-tal will exit the company by selling its equity share. Through literature re-view we have identified different motivations, best practices, and barriers to the successful implementation of a spin-along approach. Furthermore, two case studies will be discussed and compared. We conclude that the approach can successfully complement internal innovation management.
|Item Type:||MPRA Paper|
|Institution:||Deutsche Telekom Laboratories|
|Original Title:||Combining spin-out and spin-in activities – the spin-along approach|
|Keywords:||Corporate venturing; spin-along; venture leader; spin-out; spin-in; Deutsche Telekom Laboratories; Cisco Systems|
|Subjects:||M - Business Administration and Business Economics ; Marketing ; Accounting ; Personnel Economics > M1 - Business Administration > M13 - New Firms ; Startups
M - Business Administration and Business Economics ; Marketing ; Accounting ; Personnel Economics > M1 - Business Administration > M10 - General
M - Business Administration and Business Economics ; Marketing ; Accounting ; Personnel Economics > M0 - General
|Depositing User:||Rene Rohrbeck|
|Date Deposited:||02. Nov 2007|
|Last Modified:||15. Feb 2013 09:44|
Day, G.S. and P.J.H. Schoemaker (2005) Scanning the periphery, Harvard Business Re-view, Vol. 83, No. 11, pp. 135-148.
Dushnitsky, G. and M.J. Lenox (2005) When do incumbents learn from entrepreneurial ventures? Corporate venture capital and investing firm innovation rates, Research Policy, Vol. 34, No. 5, pp. 615-639.
Block, Z. and I.C. MacMillan (1993) Corporate venturing: creating new businesses within the firm, Boston, Mass.: Harvard Business School Press.
Arthur D. Little (2002) Venturing for Innovation - Developments in the area of Corporate Venturing based on a global Arthur D. Little study, Thalwil: Arthur D. Little, pp. 1-41.
Dushnitsky, G. and M.J. Lenox (2006) When does corporate venture capital investment create firm value?, Journal of Business Venturing, Vol. 21, No. 6, pp. 753-772.
Brody, P. and D. Ehrlich (1998) Can big companies become successful venture capital-ists?, The McKinsey Quarterly, Vol. 1998, No. 2, pp. 50-63.
McJunkin, J. and T. Reynders (2000) Cisco Systems: A novel approach to structuring entrepreneurial ventures. Graduate School of Business Stanford University Vol. Case Number: EC-15, pp. 1-23.
Kambil, A., E.D. Eselius, and K.A. Monteiro (2000) Fast Venturing: The Quick Way To Start Web Businesses, MIT Sloan Management Review, Vol. 41, No. 4, pp. 55-67.
Miles, M.P. and J.G. Covin (2002) Exploring the Practice of Corporate Venturing: Some Common Forms and Their Organizational Implications, Entrepreneurship: Theory & Practice, Vol. 26, No. 3, pp. 21-40.
Thornberry, N. (2001) Corporate Entrepreneurship: Antidote or Oxymoron?, European Management Journal Vol. 19, No. 5, pp. 526-533.
EIRMA (2003) Innovation Through Spinning In and Out Research Technology Manage-ment, Vol. 46, No. 5, pp. 63-64.
Freese, B. (2005) Corporate-Venture-Capital-Einheiten als Wissensbroker, Empirische Untersuchung interorganisationaler Beziehungen zwischen Industrie-und Start-up Unternehmen (Book), Universitaet Bern, pp. 267-269.
Jagersma, P.K. and D.M. van Gorp (2003) Spin-out management: theory and practice, Business Horizons, Vol. 46, No. 2, pp. 1-15.
Keil, T. (2004) Building External Corporate Venturing Capability, Journal of Management Studies, Vol. 41, No. 5, pp. 799-825.
Sharma, P. and J.J. Chrisman (1999) Toward a Reconciliation of the Definitional Issues in the Field of Corporate Entrepreneurship, Entrepreneurship: Theory & Practice, Vol. 23, No. 3, pp. 11-27.
Chandy, R.K. and G.J. Tellis (2000) The Incumbent's Curse? Incumbency, Size, and Radical Product Innovation, Journal of Marketing, Vol. 64, No. 3, pp. 1-17.
Birkinshaw, J. (1997) ENTREPRENEURSHIP IN MULTINATIONAL CORPORATIONS: THE CHARACTERISTICS OF SUBSIDIARY INITIATIVES, Strategic Management Jour-nal,, Vol. 18, No. 3, pp. 207–229
Zahra, S.A. (1993) ENVIRONMENT, CORPORATE ENTREPRENEURSHIP; AND FINANCIIAL PERFORMANCE: A TAXONOMIC APPROACH, Journal of Business Ven-turing, Vol. 8, pp. 319-340.
Zahra, S.A. (1995) ENVIRONMENT, CORPORATE ENTREPRENEURSHIP; AND FINANCIIAL PERFORMANCE: THE CASE OF MANAGEMENT LEVERAGED BUYOUTS, Jounal of Business Venturing, Vol. 10, pp. 225-247.
Zahra, S.A. (1996) TECHNOLOGY STRATEGY AND NEW VENTURE PERFORMANCE: A STUDY OF CORPORATE-SPONSORED AND INDEPENDENT BIOTECHNOLOGY VENTURES, Jounal of Business Venturing, Vol. 11, pp. 289-321.
Carrier, C. (1997) Intrapreneurship in Small Businesses: An explaratory Study, Entrepre-neurship: Theory & Practice, Vol. 21, No. 1, pp. 5, 16.
Christensen, K.S. (2004) A classification of the corporate entrepreneurship umbrella: labels and perspectives, International Journal of Management & Enterprise Development, Vol. 1, No. 4, pp. 1-1.
Siegel, R., E. Siegel, and I.C. MacMillan (1988) Corporate Venture Capitalists: Auton-omy, Obstacles, and Performance, Journal of Business Venturing, Vol. 3, No. 3, pp. 233-247.
Tidd, J. and S. Barnes (2000) Spin-in or spin-out? Corporate venturing in life sciences, The International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation, Vol. 1, No., pp. 109-116.
Cohen, W.M., R.C. Levin, and D.C. Mowery (1987) FIRM SIZE AND R&D INTENSITY: A RE-EXAMINATION, Journal of Industrial Economics, Vol. 35, No. 4, pp. 543-565.
Schildt, H.A., M.V.J. Maula, and T. Keil (2005) Explorative and Exploitative Learning from External Corporate Ventures, Entrepreneurship: Theory & Practice, Vol. 29, No. 4, pp. 493-515.
Burgelman, R.A. (1983) A Process Model of Internal Corporate Venturing in the Diversified Major Firm, Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol. 28, No. 2, pp. 223.
Burgelman, R.A. (1983) A Model of the Interaction of Strategic Behavior, Corporate Context, and the Concept of Strategy, Academy of Management Review, Vol. 8, No. 1, pp. 61-70.
Wallin, M.W. and Ã.s. Lindholm Dahlstrand (2006) Sponsored spin-offs, industrial growth and change, Technovation, Vol. 26, No. 5/6, pp. 611-620.
Chesbrough, H. (2000) Designing Corporate Ventures in the Shadow of Private Venture Capital, California Management Review, Vol. 42, No. 3, pp. 3-49.
Maula, M., E. Autio, and G. Murray (2005) Corporate Venture Capitalists and Independ-ent Venture Capitalists: What do they know, Who do They Know and Should Entrepre-neurs Care?, Venture Capital, Vol. 7, No. 1, pp. 3-21.
Mcjunkin, J.a.R., T. (2000) Cisco Systems: a novel approach to structuring entrepreneu-rial ventures, Saloner and Spence Creating and Capturing Value: Perspectives and Cases on Electronic Commerce., Vol. 15, pp. 508-532.
Kenney, M.F.M., David (2002) Economic Action Does Not Take Place in a Vacuum: Understanding Cisco’s Acquisition and Development Strategy, BRIE Working Paper, Vol. 148, pp. 299-325
Vance, A. (2006) Cisco's mushy 'spin-in' deals undermine acquisition heroics, The Regis-ter, pp.1-3.