Soldatos, Gerasimos T. (2014): Modern Social Science Concepts, Proportionate Reciprocity, Modesty, and Democracy.
PDF
MPRA_paper_56234.pdf Download (414kB) |
Abstract
Aristotle’s economics of exchange: (a) Ideally, reciprocal justice in bilateral bargaining to minimize expenditure given utility levels results in Pareto-efficient, envy-free, equitable outcomes. (b) Practically, bargaining under the threat or actual recontracting may act as a surrogate of reciprocal justice, leading to an N-person (N-dimensional) contract topology. (c) But, recontracting is subject to practical limitations too, in which case near-reciprocal justice/general equilibrium outcomes may be fostered if, as a surrogate of recontracting, modesty in interaction is exhibited in an evolutionarily-stable-strategy fashion. (d) That is, incomplete recontracting amounts to asymmetric agent-type information, which in turn lays the ground for injustices; the same lack of information prevents rectificatory justice from being efficient and hence, modesty can be efficient only if it operates as a social norm and hence, only in a modest polity, which can be no other than democracy. The modern-day terminology used in connection with Aristotle sounds bizarre, but by this is meant that his thinking and answers on issues preoccupying social science for centuries, do not differ much from modern-day approaches to the same issues.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | Modern Social Science Concepts, Proportionate Reciprocity, Modesty, and Democracy |
English Title: | Modern Social Science Concepts, Proportionate Reciprocity, Modesty, and Democracy |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | reciprocal justice, reciprocal figures, general equilibrium, modesty |
Subjects: | B - History of Economic Thought, Methodology, and Heterodox Approaches > B1 - History of Economic Thought through 1925 > B11 - Preclassical (Ancient, Medieval, Mercantilist, Physiocratic) D - Microeconomics > D5 - General Equilibrium and Disequilibrium D - Microeconomics > D6 - Welfare Economics D - Microeconomics > D7 - Analysis of Collective Decision-Making P - Economic Systems > P0 - General |
Item ID: | 56264 |
Depositing User: | Gerasimos T. Soldatos |
Date Deposited: | 30 May 2014 03:35 |
Last Modified: | 27 Sep 2019 08:40 |
References: | Anonymous of Iamblichus, my translation from: http://www.greek-language.gr/digital Resources/ancient_greek/anthology/literature/browse.html?text_id=215. Aristotle. 1894. Ethica Nicomachea. Ed. William David Ross. Oxford: Clarendon Press. Arnhart, L. 1994. “The Darwinian Biology of Aristotle’s Political Animals”. American Journal of Political Science,38(2),464-485. Blaug, M. (Ed.) (1991). Aristotle (384–322 BC). Brookfield, Vermont: Edward Elgar. Burgess, R.L. and Bushell, D.Jr. 1969. Behavioral Sociology: The Experimental Analysis of Social Process. New York: Columbia University Press. Crespo, R. F. 2013. Philosophy of the Economy: An Aristotelian Approach. New York: Springer. Crespo, R. F. 2014. A Re-Assessment of Aristotle’s Economic Thought. London: Routledge. Cui, T.H, et al. 2007. “Fairness and Channel Coordination”. Management Science, 53(8), 1303-1314. Falk, A. et al. 2005. “Driving Forces Behind Informal Sanctions”. Econometrica, 73(6), 2017-2030. Fehr, E. and Gachter, S. 2000. “Fairness and Retaliation: The Economics of Reciprocity”. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 14(3), 159-183. Flew, A., (ed.) 1979. “Golden Rule” in A Dictionary of Philosophy. London: Pan Books. Gordon, B. 1975. Economic Analysis before Adam Smith: Hesiod to Lessius. London: MacMillan. Gouldner, A. W. 1960. “The Norm of Reciprocity: A Preliminary Statement”. American Sociological Review, 25(2), 161-178. Grant, A. 1885. The Ethics of Aristotle. London: Longmans, Green. Guttman, J. M. 2003. “Repeated Interaction and the Evolution of Preferences for Reciprocity”. Economic Journal, 113, No.489 (July 2003), 631-656. Jaffe, W. 1974. “Edgeworth’s Contract Curve, Part 2. Two Figures in its Protohistory, Aristotle and Gossen”. History of Political Economy, 6(3), 381-404. Jaffe, W. 1977. “The Normative Bias of the Walrasian Model: Walras Versus Gossen”. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 91(3), 371-387. Jill, F. 2005. A Democracy of Distinction: Aristotle and the Wotk of Politics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Kahneman, D. et al. 1986. “Fairness and the Assumptions of Economics”. Journal of Business, 59(4), (Part 2: The Behavioral Foundations of Economic Theory), 285-300. Lewis, T.J. 1978. “Acquisition and Anxiety: Aristotle's Case against the Market”. Canadian Journal of Economics, 11(1), 69-90. Lubell, M. and Scholz, J.T. 2001. “Cooperation, Reciprocity, and the Collective-Action Heuristic”. American Journal of Political Science, 45(1), 160-178. MacCormack, G. 1976. “Reciprocity”. Man, New Series, 11(1), 89-103. Meikle, S. (1995). Aristotle’s Economic Thought. Oxford: Clarendon Press. Mises Ludwig, von 1963 [1949]. Human Action, A Treatise On Economics. 4th edition, San Francisco: Fox and Wilkes. Moller, A. 2000. Naukratis: Trade in Archaic Greece. New York: Oxford University Press. Molm, L. 2010. “The Structure of Reciprocity”. Social Psychology Quarterly, 73(2), 119-131. Ostrom, E. 2000. “Collective Action and the Evolution of Social Norms”. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 14(3), 137-158. Pack, S. J. 2008. “Aristotle’s Difficult Relationship With Modern Economic Theory”. Foundations of Science, 13, 265-280. Ross, W.D. 1923. Aristotle. London: Metheun. Rothbard M. N. 1987. “Catallactics”. In Eatwell et al (eds), vol.1, 377-378, The New Palgrave: A Dictionary of Economics, London, Macmillan. Schumpeter, J.A. 1954. History of Economic Analysis. Ed. by E. Boody Schumpeter, Oxford: Oxford University Press. Simpson, R. 1804. The Elements of Euclid; viz. The First Six Books, together with the Eleventh and Twelfth. 12th ed.,London-Wingrave. Stewart, J.A. 1973. Notes on the Nicomachean Ethics of Aristotle. New York: Arno Press. Staveren, I. V. 2001. The Values of Economics: An Aristotelian Perspective. London: Routledge. Theocarakis, N.J. 2006. “Nicomachean Ethics in Political Economy: The Trajectory of the Problem of Value”. History of Economic Ideas, 14(1), 9-53. Trevett, J.C. 2001. “Coinage and democracy at Athens”. In K. Shipton and A. Meadows (ed.) Money and its Uses in the Ancient Greek World (Oxford, 2001) 23-34. Van Johnson. 1939. “Aristotle’s Theory of Value”. American Journal of Philology, 60(4), 445-451. Walras, Leon 1969 [1874]. Elements d'Economie Politique pure ou Theorie de la Richesse Sociale. New York: Augustus Kelley; 1st ed. (in two installments) (Lausanne: Corbaz, 1874-1877). Winthrop, D. 1978. “Aristotle and Theories of Justice”. American Political Science Review, 72(4), 1201-1216. |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/56264 |
Available Versions of this Item
- Modern Social Science Concepts, Proportionate Reciprocity, Modesty, and Democracy. (deposited 30 May 2014 03:35) [Currently Displayed]