الإنفاق العمومي والإستثمار الخاص اختبار أثر المزاحمة عبر المعاينة المعادة

Ghassan, Hassan B. (2002): الإنفاق العمومي والإستثمار الخاص اختبار أثر المزاحمة عبر المعاينة المعادة. Published in: Public Administration Journal , Vol. 43, No. 4 (12 July 2003): pp. 727-754.

Abstract

The purpose of this research is to test and evaluate the crowding-out effect of the investment expenditure in public sector on the investment effort by private sector by using data from Moroccan Economy. After the theoretical background of crowding-out effects in many domains of investment, we introduce the interests variables which express the budget policy of a government and monetary policy of the central bank, and shows the global effective demand addressed to economy. This requires the improvement of a likelihood private investment model and the specification of its shape from a Box-Cox transformation by using the weight average test LM. It has become clear that in the long run term the push effect dominates the crowding-out effect and this leads to a little increase in the elasticity of private investment reaches 0.06%. We have used the bootstrapping methodology to check the signs and the values of crowding-out parameters. Among the main causes which explain this small effect are the investors’ behaviour and their reactions vis-à-vis the real economic data and growth expectation, the nature of national and foreign markets of products and their competitiveness, and the nature and situation of finance market and banks, which has put, some extent, Moroccan economy into a “trap of liquidity” especially during the last few years.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• English Title: Public Spending and Private Investment: Test of Crowding-out Effects through Re-sampling
• Language: Arabic
• Keywords: Public Investment, Private Investment, Crowding-out, Box-Cox, Bootstrapping, Morocco.
• Subjects: C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C5 - Econometric Modeling; E - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics > E2 - Consumption, Saving, Production, Investment, Labor Markets, and Informal Economy; H - Public Economics > H5 - National Government Expenditures and Related Policies; H - Public Economics > H5 - National Government Expenditures and Related Policies > H54 - Infrastructures ; Other Public Investment and Capital Stock

References

1. Ahamed, & Miller, (2000): «Crowding-out and Crowding in effect of the Government expenditures» Contemporary Economics Policy, 18, n1, pp 124-133. 2. AlHakmi A. Ottman (2002). Analysis of the Causal Relationship between Government Spending and Government Revenues in Saudi Arabia: Evidence from Cointegration and Granger-Causality Models. Public Administration Journal 42(3), 475-493. (In Arabic Language) 3. AlJarah MA. And AlMhemed AA. (1997). Government Expenditures and Private Investment in Saudi Arabia: Empirical Study. Journal of the Gulf and Arabian Peninsula Studies 86, 83-93. (In Arabic Language) 4. Argimon, I. & Ali. (1997): «Evidence of Public Spending Crowding-out from a Panel of OECD Countries» Journal of Applied Economics, 29, pp 1001-1011. 5. Aschauer, D.A. (1989): «Does public capital crowd out private capital?» Journal of Monetary Economics, 24, pp 171-188. 6. Bari ZA. (2002): Crowding-out Effect between Public Spending and Private Spending: Empirical Evidence from Saudi Arabia. Journal of King Saud University 14(2). 7. Blejer M. & Khan M. (1984): «Government policy and private investment in developing countries» IMF Staff paper, 31, pp 379-403. 8. Bairam E. & Bert W. (1994): «Externality effect of government expenditure on investment in OECD countries» Applied Economics, 25, pp 711-716. 9. Barro R. (1990): «Government Spending in a simple model of endogenous growth» Journal of Political Economic, 98, pp 93-125. 10. Davidson R. & MacKinnon J.G. (2000): «Bootstrap tests : How Many Bootstraps ?» Econometric Review, 19, pp 55-68. 11. Davidson R. & MacKinnon J.G. (1987): «Implicit alternatives and the local power of test statistics» Econometrica, 55, pp 1305-1329. 12. Engle R.F. & Granger C.W.J. (1987): «Cointegration and correction error : representation, estimation and testing». Econometrica, n°55, pp.251-276. 13. Elliott, G., Rothenberg, T. & Stock, J. (1996): «Efficient tests for an autoregressive unit root». Econometrica, Vol. 64. 14. Erenburg, S.J. & Wohar M.E. (1995): «Public and private investment are there causal linkages ?». Journal of Macroeconomics, n°17, pp.1-30. 15. Flachaire, E. (2000): «Les méthodes bootstrap dans les modèles de régression». Economie et Prévision, n°142 / 2000-1. 16. Ghassan, H. (2003): «Relations de long terme entre investissement, déficit extérieur et autofinancement sur un panel sectoriel». Revue de Droit et d’Economie, vol. n°20, 2003, Fès - Maroc. 17. Hurlin, Ch. (1999): «La contribution du capital public à la productivité des facteurs privés : une estimation sur panel sectoriel pour dix pays de l’OCDE» Economie et Prévision, 137, 1999-1. 18. Lonney, R. (1995): «A post-Keynesian assessment of alternative Saudi Arabian austerity strategies» Journal of The social Sciences, 23, pp 251-273. 19. Lütkepohl, H. (1991): «Introduction to multiple time series analysis». Edition Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg. 20. Lütkepohl, H. & Reimers, H.E. (1992): «Granger causality in co integrated far process : the case of term structure». Economic Letters, 40, pp 263-268. 21. Monadjem, M. (1993): «Fiscal policy and private investment expenditure: a study of Australia and the United States» Applied Economics, 25, pp 143-148. 22. Odedekun M. (1997): «Relative effect of Public versus Private Investment Spending on Economic Efficiency and Growth in Developing Countries » Journal of Applied Economics, 23, pp 1325-1336. 23. Van Giersbergen, N.B.A & Kiviet, J.F. (1994): «How to implement bootstrap hypothesis testing in static and dynamic regression model». Work paper TI n°94-130, Amsterdam: Tinbergen Institute. 24. Voss, G.M. (2002): «Public and private investment in the United States and Canada». Economic Modeling, 19, pp 641-664.