Komparácia názorov na sociálnu zrelosť u denných a externých študentov

Misun, Juraj and Misunova Hudakova, Ivana (2014): Komparácia názorov na sociálnu zrelosť u denných a externých študentov. Published in: Manažment podnikania a vecí verejných - Dialógy , Vol. 9, No. 24 (June 2014): pp. 93-107.

Abstract

The term social maturity becomes currently more and more important, because egoism, pursuit of wealth, shoddy and unscrupulous people are today dominating. Thanks to these qualities of humans, organizations and society as a whole, we can determine the nature of people and their personality. This is also working in the professional life, because character qualities of management subjects constitute the top of social maturity. Social maturity belongs to one of the three pillars of the holistic managerial competence and represents the key pillar. The other two are manager knowledge and application skills. Social maturity is a conscious or unconscious observance of basic human principles of behavior, enabling them to maintain the holistic of personality. A human being becomes social mature through qualities that he/she receives either through genetic heritability or through the environment in which he/she raises and education. The main groups of these qualities are character properties, will qualities, cognitive qualities, creative qualities, qualities of temperament, emotional qualities, somatic – physical qualities and somatic – spiritual qualities. Through the questionnaire method, we examined opinions of management subjects on each of the three pillars of the holistic managerial competence. Exact 300 respondents from Slovakia and the Czech Republic belonged either to a group of managers, full-time or part-time students. The aim of the paper is a comparison of views of full-time and part-time students on issues of social maturity.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• English Title: Comparison of views on the social maturity of full- and part-time students
• Language: Slovak
• Keywords: Social maturity, social intelligence, holistic managerial competence, sustainable development.
• Subjects: M - Business Administration and Business Economics ; Marketing ; Accounting ; Personnel Economics > M1 - Business Administration > M12 - Personnel Management ; Executives; Executive Compensation; M - Business Administration and Business Economics ; Marketing ; Accounting ; Personnel Economics > M1 - Business Administration > M19 - Other

References

1. ALBRECHT, K. 2006. Social Intelligence. The New Science of Success. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, 2006. 289 s. 2. BIRKNEROVÁ, Z. (2010). Aspekty sociálnej a emociálnej inteligencie v praxi. Manažment podnikania a vecí verejných. roč. 6, č. 10. s. 7-18. 3. CECIL, R. D. – ROTHWELL, W. J. 2006. Next Generation Management Development: The Complete Guide and Resource. San Francisco: John Wiley & Sons, 2006. 489 s. 4. CHRISTOPHER, W. F. (2007). Holistic Management – Managing what matters for company success. John Wiley & Sons. Hoboken, New Jersey. 5. DONELLY, J. H. – GIBSON, J. L. – IVANCEVICH, J. M. 1997. Management. Grada Publishing, Praha. 6. GOLEMAN, D. (2006). Social Inteligence: The Revolutionary New Science of Human Relationships. Bantam Dell, New York. 405 s. 7. HARRISON, D., SZÉLL, G., BOURQUE, R. (2009). Social innovation, the Social Economy and World Economic development.Democracy and Labour Rights in an Era of Globalization. Peter Lang. Frankfurt am Main. 8. JAKOBI, J. 1992. Psychológia C. G. Junga. Psychoanalytické nakladatelství, Praha. 9. JONIAKOVÁ, Z. – BLŠTÁKOVÁ, J. 2013. Význam organizačnej kultúry pre aplikáciu spoločensky zodpovedného podnikania. Dobrovoľníctvo v organizáciách na Slovensku – výsledky výskumu. Ekonomické rozhľady. roč. 42, č. 3, s. 371-383. 10. JUDT, T. 2011. Zle se vede Zemi: pojednavání o naší současné nespokojenosti. Praha: Rybka Publishers, 2011. 191 s. 11. KELLER, J. 2010. Tri sociální světy, socialní struktura postindustrialní společnosti. Praha: SLON, Edice studie, 2010. 12. KOSTURIAK, J. 2013. Leadership – návrat ke kořenúm. Moderní řizení. ISSN 0026-8720, roč. 48, č. 2 (Február), s. 8-11. 13. KRUGMAN, P. R. 1996. Pop internationalism. Massachusetts Institute of Technology. 221 s. 14. MEZRICKY, V. 2011. Perspektivy globalizace. Praha: Bratal, 2011. 232 pp. 15. MORRIS, M. 2012. Co nesmite vedet! Anch Books, Bratislava. 383 s. 16. PORVAZNÍK, J. (2001). Kompetentnosť podnikateľov – základ udržateľného rozvoja organizácie v novom miléniu. First International Scientific Conference on Bata's System of Management, May 16-18, 2001. The Tomas Bata University In Zlín. On-line: www.bata-konference.utb.cz/2001/czech/referaty/porvaznik.doc 17. PORVAZNÍK, J. (2003). Celostní management: pilíře, kompetence v řízení. Sprint vfra, Bratislava. 18. PORVAZNIK, J. 2011. Celostný manažment. Bratislava: SPRINT. 19. PORVAZNIK, J. 2011. Sociálna zrelosť (inteligencia) subjektov manažmentu a jej vplyv na dlhodobý udrzatelný rozvoj ľudskej civilizácie. In Teoreticke a metodologicke koncepty zistovania socialnej inteligencie v kontexte pribuznych oblasti podnikania. Prešov: Fakulta manažmentu, Presovska univerzita v Presove, 2011. 20. PORVAZNIK, J. et at. 2012. Metodologické vychodiská modelovania a ohodnocovania celostnej kompetentnosti subjektov manažmentu. Manažment podnikania a vecí verejných. roč. 7, č. 17, s. 7-11. 21. PORVAZNÍK, J. – LJUDVIGOVÁ, I. 2013. The pillars of holistic governance (leadership and management) of global environment on planet Earth. In 11th EBES conference - Ekaterinburg: september 12-14, 2013, Ekaterinburg, Russia. Istanbul: Teknik Basim Matbaacilik, 2013. s. 60-61. 22. REMEŇOVÁ, K. – SZABO, Ľ. 2013. Kompetentnosť manažéra a jeho štýl rozhodovania. In Krízový manažment podniku. Bratislava: EKONÓM, 2013. s. 61-68. 23. STIGLITZ , J. E. 2013. Project Syndicate 2013, Ekonom, č. 9, s. 36. 24. WALKER, A., van der MAESEN, L.J.G. 2012. Social Quality – from theory to indicators. Palgrave & Macmillan, Hampshire.