Risk Taking Behavior and Capital Adequacy in a Mixed Banking System: New Evidence from Malaysia using Dynamic OLS and Two-step Dynamic System GMM Estimators

Abdul Wahab, Hishamuddin and Rosly, Saiful Azhar and Masih, Abul Mansur M. (2014): Risk Taking Behavior and Capital Adequacy in a Mixed Banking System: New Evidence from Malaysia using Dynamic OLS and Two-step Dynamic System GMM Estimators.

Abstract

The financial and banking crises around the world have prompted the regulators to revise, among others, the capital level of the banks to deal with the excessive risks taken by the banks, both conventional and Islamic. This study is the first attempt to investigate the relationship between risky assets and capital level in a mixed banking system applying the panel VECM and dynamic GMM estimators. The Malaysian mixed banking system is used as a case study taking panel data covering the period from December 2006 to October 2013. Our statistical results based on dynamic OLS (DOLS) tend to indicate that there is a positive relationship between the capital ratio (CAR) and risk weighted asset ratio (RWA) in the long run and also, the causality analysis based on panel VECM and two-step dynamic System GMM tends to indicate unidirectional causality in that the RWA is positively driven by CAR. Our results appear to suggest that higher capital buffer (excess capital above regulatory capital requirement) might have opened up more space for bank managers to taking risky positions while assisted by increasing domestic demand for credit facilities under favorable economic condition of Malaysia. In other words, high capital growth and capital buffer provides an extra cushion for Malaysian banks to pursue relatively riskier financing activities. For the full-fledge Islamic banks (IB) and Islamic bank subsidiaries (IBS), the existence of a cointegrating relationship between RWA and CAR suggests that the way the managers of Islamic banks behave towards risky assets follows the conventional practice.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: Risk-taking, DOLS, Panel VECM, two-step dynamic System GMM
• Subjects: C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C5 - Econometric Modeling > C58 - Financial Econometrics; G - Financial Economics > G2 - Financial Institutions and Services > G21 - Banks ; Depository Institutions ; Micro Finance Institutions ; Mortgages; G - Financial Economics > G2 - Financial Institutions and Services > G28 - Government Policy and Regulation

References

Arellano, M. and Bond, S. (1991), ‘Some Tests for Specification for Panel Data: Monte Carlo Evidence and an Application to Employment Equations,’ Review of Economic Studies 58, 277-297.

Arellano, M. and Bover, O. (1995), ‘Another Look at the Instrumental Variable Estimation of Error Component Models,’ Journal of Econometrics 68, 29-51.

Bank Negara Malaysia Monthly Statistical Buletin. [Retrieved January 10, 2014], http://www.bnm.gov.my/

Berger, A. N. and Udell, G.F. (1994), ‘Did Risk-based Capital Allocate Bank Credit and Cause “Credit Crunch” in the US?,’ Journal of Money, Credit and Banking 26(3), 585-628.

Blum, J. (1999), ‘Do Capital Adequacy Requirements Reduce Risks in Banking?,’ Journal of Banking and Finance 23, 755-771.

Blundell, R. and Bond, S. (1998), ‘Intial Conditions and Moment Restrictions in Dynamic Panel Data Models,’ Journal of Econometrics 87, 115-143.

Delis, M.D., and G. P. Kouretas., 2011. Interest Rates and Bank Risk Taking, Journal of Banking and Finance 35, pp. 840-855.

Engle, R. F. and Granger, C.W.J. (1987), ‘Cointegration and Error Correction: Representation, Estimation and Testing,’ Econometrica 55, 251-276.

Francis, W. B. and Osborne, M. (2012), ‘Capital Requirements and Bank Behavior in the UK: Are There Lessons for International Capital Standards?,’ Journal of Banking & Finance 36, 803-816.

Iqbal, Z. and Mirakhor, A. (2007), ‘An Introduction to Islamic Finance,’ John Wiley and Sons (Asia) Pte Ltd.

Jacques, K. and Nigro, K. (1997), ‘Risk Based Capital, Portfolio Risk and Bank Capital: A Simultaneous Equations Approach,’ Journal of Economics and Business 49, 533-547.

Jeitschko, T.D. and Jeung, S. D. (2005), ‘Incentive for Risk Taking in Banking – A Unified Approach,’ Journal of Banking and Finance 29, 759-777.

Jokipii, T. and Milner, A. (2011), ‘Bank Capital Buffer and Risk Adjustment Decisions,’ Journal of Financial Stability 7, 165-178.

Kao, C. (1999), ‘Spurious Regression and Residual Based Tests for Cointegration in Panel Data,’ Journal of Econometrics 90, pp. 1-44.

Karim, M.A., Hassan, M.K., Hassan, T. and Mohamad, S. (2013), ‘Capital Adequacy and Lending and Deposit Behaviors of Conventional and Islamic banks, Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, Article in press, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pacific.2013.11.002

Konishi, M. and Yasuda, Y. (2004), ‘Factors Affecting Bank Risk Taking: Evidence from Japan,’ Journal of Banking and Finance 28, 215-232.

Larson, R., Lyhagen, J. and Lothgren, M. (2001), ‘Likelihood Based Cointegration Tests in Heterogenous Panels,’ Econometrics Journal 4, 109-142.

Lee, C-C. and Hsieh, M-F. (2013), ‘The Impact of Bank Capital on Profitability and Risk in Asian Banking,’ Journal of International Money and Finance 32, 251-281.

Masih, R. and Masih, A.M.M. (1996), ‘Stock-Watson Dynamic OLS (DOLS) and Error Correction Modeling Approaches to Estimating Long- and Short-run Elasticities in a Demand Function: New Evidence and Methodological Implications from an Application to the Demand for Coal in Mainland China, Energy Economics 18, 315-334.

Pedroni, P. (1999), ‘Critical Values for Cointegration Tests in Heterogenous Panels With Multiple Regressors,’ Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics 61(4), 5-49.

Pedroni, P. (2000), ‘Fully Modified OLS for Heterogenous Cointegrated Panel?,’ Advances in Econometrics 15, 93-130.

Rime, B. (2001), ‘Capital Requirements and Bank Behavior: Empirical Evidence for Switzerland,’ Journal of Banking and Finance 25, 789-805.

Shrieves, R.E. and Dahl, D. (1992), ‘The Relationship Between Risk and Capital in Commercial Banks,’ Journal of Banking and Finance 16, 439-457.

Stock, J.H. and Watson, M. (1993), ‘A Simple Estimator of Cointegrating Vectors in Higher Order Integrated Systems,’ Econometrica 61, 783-820.

VanHoose, D. (2007), ‘Theories of Bank Behavior Under Capital Regulation,’ Journal of Banking and Finance 31, 3680-3697.

Windmeijer, F. (2005), ‘A Finite Sample Correction for the Variance of Linear Efficient Two-step GMM Estimators,’ Journal of Econometrics 126(1), 25-51.

Zhang, Z-Y., Wu, J. and Liu, Q. F. (2008), ‘Impacts of Capital Adequacy Regulation on Risk Taking Behaviors of Banking,’ System Engineering – Theory and Practice 28(8), 183-189.