Economou, Emmanouel/Marios/Lazaros and Kyriazis, Nicholas (2014): Achaeans, Indians and Europeans: A Comparison of federations.
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_57289.pdf Download (515kB) | Preview |
Abstract
In the present essay we undertake the comparison of three federations, the ancient Greek Achaean, with the modern Indian and the European Union (EU). We elaborate a set of criteria, democratization and cohesion, which include each four sub-criteria, in order to analyse the institutional set-up of the federations. We compare the three federations according to three criteria and conclude that the Achaean ranks first as to democratization, being the most democratic, with the EU a distant third, while as to cohesion, the Achaean and Indian rank close together, with the EU again a distant third.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | Achaeans, Indians and Europeans: A Comparison of federations |
English Title: | Achaeans, Indians and Europeans: A Comparison of federations |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | Federations, democratization, cohesion, Achaean Federation, EU, India. |
Subjects: | H - Public Economics > H5 - National Government Expenditures and Related Policies H - Public Economics > H5 - National Government Expenditures and Related Policies > H56 - National Security and War H - Public Economics > H6 - National Budget, Deficit, and Debt H - Public Economics > H7 - State and Local Government ; Intergovernmental Relations > H77 - Intergovernmental Relations ; Federalism ; Secession K - Law and Economics > K1 - Basic Areas of Law > K10 - General Z - Other Special Topics > Z1 - Cultural Economics ; Economic Sociology ; Economic Anthropology > Z13 - Economic Sociology ; Economic Anthropology ; Social and Economic Stratification |
Item ID: | 57289 |
Depositing User: | Emmanouel-Marios-Lazaros Economou |
Date Deposited: | 13 Jul 2014 21:54 |
Last Modified: | 28 Sep 2019 02:30 |
References: | References Ancient authors Aristotle ‘Politics’, (Arist. Pol.). Plato ‘Republic’ (Pl. Rep.). Plutarch ‘Life of Aratus’, (Pl. Ar.). Polybius ‘Histories’ (Pol. Hist.). Thucydides ‘History’ (Funeral Oration), (Thuc. F.). Xenophon ‘The Polity of the Athenians’, (Xen. Pol.). Modern authors Ager, S. (1996). Interstate relations in the Greek world 337-90 BC. Berkeley, Los Angeles and London: University of California Press. Anderson, J.K. (1967). Philopoemen’s reform of the Achaean army. Classical Philology, 62(2), 104-106. Arvanitides, P. & Kyriazis, N. (2012). Public choice, economy and war in classical Athens. Paper presented at the 16th Annual International Conference on Economics and Security, Cairo, June, 2012. Arora B (2010), Governing federal India. Political Institutions for a diverse society and a resurgent economy. Centre for Multilevel Federalism, Institute of Social Sciences. New Delhi. http://www.societe-de-strategie.asso.fr/pdf/agir43txt3.pdf. Retrieved on July 12, 2014. Badian, E. (1952). The treaty between Rome and the Achaean League. The Journal of Roman Studies, 42(1/2), 76-80. Βriscoe J (1974) The Greek resistance to Rome. The Classical Review 24: 258-261. Caspari MOB (1914) The parliament of the Achaean League. The English Historical Review 29: 209-220. Caspari MOB (1917) A survey of Greek federal coinage. The Journal of Hellenic Studies 37: 168-183. Cronin ET (1999) Direct democracy: The politics of initiative referendum and recall. Harvard: Harvard University Press. Cohen E (1997) Athenian economy and society: A banking perspective. Princeton University Press, Princeton. Davids K, M. t’ Hart M (2012) The navy and the rise of the state: The Case of the Netherlands c. 1570-1810. In J. Backhaus, N. Kyriazis and N. Rodger, (eds), Navies and State Formation (pp. 273-316). Berlin: Lang Verlag. De Laix RA (1973) The silver coinage of the Aetolian League. Californian Studies in Classical Antiquity 6: 47-75. Economou, E.M.L, Kyriazis, N. and Metaxas (under preparation), The institutional Foundations of Regional Proto-federations. Economou, E.M.L & Kyriazis, N. (2013), The emergence and the development of the federations: The Achaean federation, the United Provinces and the EU. Munich Personal RePEc Archive, MPRA Paper No. 47349. Engen D (2005) Ancient greenbacks, Athenian owls, the law of Nicophon, and the greek economy. Historia 54: 359-381. Chinard G (1940) Polybius and the American Constitution, Journal of the History of Ideas 1(1): 38-58. Grainger JD (1999) The league of the Aitolians. Brill Academic Pub, Leiden and Boston. Gummere RM (1962) The classical ancestry of the United States constitution. American Quarterly 14(1): 3-18. Halkos G, Kyriazis N (2006) Is tax competition harmful and is the EU an optimal tax area? European Journal of Law and Economics 21: 163–177. Karunakaran N (2014), India's case for direct democracy? European Union shows the way to put citizens at the centre of decision-making. http://articles.economictimes.indiatimes.com/2014-03-13/news/48189738_1_direct-democracy-european-parliament-citizens/2. Retrieved in July 12, 2014. Kejriwal A (2010). India should move towards direct democracy. http://governancenow.com/views/columns/india-should-move-towards-direct-democracy. Retrieved in July, 12, 2014. Kyriazis N (2009) Financing the Athenian state: Public choice in the age of Demosthenes. European Journal of Law and Economics 27: 109-127. Kyriazis N (2012) Why ancient Greece? Athens: Psychogios Publications. Larsen JAO (1952) The assembly of the Aetolian League. Transactions and Proceedings of the American Philological Association 83: 1-33. Larsen JAO (1971) The rights of cities within the Achaean Confederacy. Classical Philology 66: 81-86. Larsen JAO (1972) A recent interpretation of the Achaean assemblies. Classical Philology 67: 178-185. Mackil E (2013) Creating a common polity. Religion, economy, and politics in the making of the Greek koinon. University of California Press, Berkeley, Los Angeles and London. Μetaxas T, Economou EML (2012) Security Policy in the European Union and the United States through the issue of their defence expenditures. Journal of Global Analysis 3: 58-81. Mitsos MT (1947) Thermika and Panaitolika. Hesperia: The Journal of the American School of Classical Studies at Athens 16: 256-261. Ober J (2008) Democracy and knowledge. Innovation and learning in Classical Athens. Princeton University Press, Princeton. Oliver JH. (1978). Panachaeans and panhellenes. Hesperia: The Journal of the American School of Classical Studies at Athens 47(2): 185-191. Pritchard D (2012). Sport, democracy and war in classical Athens. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Rahtjen BD (1965) Philistine and hebrew amphictionies. Journal of Near Eastern Studies 24: 100-104. Roberts K (2011). The origins of business money and markets. New York: Columbia University Press. Scholten JB (2000) The Politics of plunder: Aitolians and their koinon in the early Hellenistic era, 279-217 BCE. University of California Press, Berkeley and Los Angeles. Singh, N, Laveesh B, Aoyu C. & Aarti K. (2003), Regional inequality in India: A Fresh Look, Economic and Political Weekly, 38 (11), 1069- 1073. Singh, N, Srinivasan TN (2006) Federalism and economic development in India: An assessment. Stanford Center for international development. Working Paper No. 299. Retrieved July 12, 2014. Singh, N. (2008),Holding India together: The role of institutions of federalism. MPRA Paper No. 12432, Munich Personal RePEc Archive. Τhompson M (1939) A hoard of Greek federal silver. Hesperia: The Journal of the American School of Classical Studies at Athens 8: 116-154. Walbank FW (1933, repr. 2010) Selected papers: Studies in Greek and Roman history and historiography. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/57289 |