Drivas, Kyriakos and Economidou, Claire and Karkalakos, Sotiris (2014): Spatial Aspects of Innovation Activity in the US. Published in: Journal of the Knowledge Economy , Vol. 5, No. 3 : pp. 464-480.
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_57861.pdf Download (261kB) | Preview |
Abstract
This paper studies the effects of spatial concentration of innovation activity on local production of patents in the US. In doing so, we augment the standard knowledge production function with a structure that allows for spatial effects, accounting along with bilateral also for multilateral influences across states. Our findings corroborate with past evidence on the important role of state’s own R&D stock and human capital in producing new inventions. In addition, external knowledge, via spatial interactions, is also a purveyor of local innovation production. The effect is stronger when we consider spatial influences from all states, in particular from the most innovative ones, and to a lesser extent from close neighboring states. Finally, spillovers are more likely to occur between states with similar technological specialization, which share common technological knowledge and pour similar technological effort.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | Spatial Aspects of Innovation Activity in the US |
English Title: | Spatial Aspects of Innovation Activity in the US |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | patents, innovation, knowledge production, spatial |
Subjects: | C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C2 - Single Equation Models ; Single Variables > C21 - Cross-Sectional Models ; Spatial Models ; Treatment Effect Models ; Quantile Regressions O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O3 - Innovation ; Research and Development ; Technological Change ; Intellectual Property Rights > O31 - Innovation and Invention: Processes and Incentives R - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics > R1 - General Regional Economics > R12 - Size and Spatial Distributions of Regional Economic Activity |
Item ID: | 57861 |
Depositing User: | Dr Dimitrios Karamanis |
Date Deposited: | 10 Aug 2014 17:14 |
Last Modified: | 01 Oct 2019 03:15 |
References: | Aghion, P. and P. Howitt (1997). Endogenous Growth Theory. Massachusetts, USA: MIT Press. Anselin, L. (1988). Spatial Econometrics, Methods and Models. Kluwer Academic, Boston. Anselin, L., A. Bera, and F. M. Yoon (1996). Simple diagnostic tests for spatial dependence. Regional Science and Urban Economics 26(1),77–104. Arrow, K. (1962). The rate and direction of inventive activity: Economic and social factors. In R. Nelson (Ed.), Economic Welfare and the Allocation of Resources for Invention, pp. 609–625. Princeton University Press, Princeton NJ. Baltagi, B. and L. Lui (2011). Instrumental variable estimation of a spatial autoregressive panel model with random effects. Economics Letters 111(2), 135–137. Blomstrom, L. and A. Kokko (1998). Multinational corporations and spillovers. Journal of Economic Surveys 12(3), 247–277. Bode, E. (2004). The spatial pattern of localized r&d spillovers: An empirical investigation for germany. Journal of Economic Geography 4(1), 43–64. Bottazzi, L. and G. Peri (2007). The international dynamics of r&d and innovation in the long run and in the short run. Economic Journal 117(518), 486–511. Branstetter, L. G. (2001). Are knowledge spillovers international or intranational in scope?: Microeconometric evidence from the u.s. and japan. Journal of International Economics 53(1), 53–79. Cameron, G., J. Proudman, and S. Redding (2005). Technological convergence, r&d, trade and productivity growth. European Economic Review 49(3), 775–809. Coe, D. and E. Helpman (1995). International R&D spillovers. European Economic Review 39(5), 859–887. Deltas, G. and S. Karkalakos (2013). Similarity of r&d activities, physical proximity, and r&d spillovers. Regional Science and Urban Economics 43(1), 124–131. Griffith, R., S. Redding, and J. van Reenen (2004). Mapping the two faces of r&d: Productivity growth in a panel of oecd industries. Review of Economics and Statistics 86(4), 883–895. Griliches, Z. (1979). Issues in assesing the contribution of r&d to productivity growth. Bell Journal of Economics 10(1), 92–116. Grossman, G. and E. Helpman (1991). Innovation and Growth in the Global Economy. Massachusetts, USA: MIT Press. Guellec, D. and B. van Pottelsberghe de la Potterie (2004). From r&d to productivity growth: Do the institutional settings and the source of funds of r&d matter? Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics 66(3), 353–378. Hall, B. and R. Ziedonis (2001). The patent paradox revisited: An empirical study of patenting in the u.s. semiconductor industry, 1979-1995. RAND Journal of Economics 32(1), 101–128. Jacobs, J. (1969). The Economy of Cities. Random House, New York. Jaffe, A. B. (1986). Technological opportunity and spillovers of r&d: Evidence from firms’ patents, profits, and market value. American Economic Review 76(5), 984–1001. Kelejian, H. and I. Prucha (1998). A generalized spatial two-stage least squares procedure for estimating a spatial autoregressive model with autoregressive disturbances. Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics 17(1), 99–121. Keller, W. (2002). Trade and the transmission of technology. Journal of Economic Growth 7(1), 5–24. Lee, L. (2003). Best spatial two-stage least square estimators for a spatial autoregressive model with autoregressive disturbances. Econometric Reviews 22(4), 307–335. Marshall, A. (1890). Principles of Economics. Macmillan, London. Pace, R. and J. LeSage (2007). Omitted variables biases of ols and spatial lag models. In Progress in Spatial Analysis: Theory and Computation, and Thematic Applications. Pez, A. and J. Le Gallo and R. Buliung and S. DallErba (eds.), Berlin: Springer. Pakes, A. and Z. Griliches (1980). Patents and r&d at the firm level: A first report. Economics Letters 5(4), 377–381. Parent, O. and J. LeSage (2008). Using the variance structure of the conditional autoregressive specification to model knowledge spillovers. Journal of Applied Econometrics 23(2), 235–256. Peri, G. (2005). Determinants of knowledge flows and their effect on innovation. Review of Economics and Statistics 87(2), 308–322. Redding, S. (1996). The low-skill, low-quality trap: Strategic complementarities between human capital and r&d. The Economic Journal 106(435), 458–470. Romer, P. (1986). Increasing returns and long-run growth. Journal of Political Economy 94(5), 1000–1037. Romer, P. M. (1989). Human capital and growth: Theory and evidence. National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper Series No. 3173. |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/57861 |