Estabilidad política y poder fiscal

Estrada, Fernando (2013): Estabilidad política y poder fiscal. Published in:

Abstract

The present study is, in particular, an attempt to test the relationship between tax level and political stability by using some economic control variables and to see the relationship among government effectiveness, corruption, and GDP. For the purpose, we used the Vector Autoregression (VAR) approach in the panel framework, using a country-level panel data from 59 countries for the period 2002 to 2008. The salient features of this model are: (a) simplicity is based on a limited number of variables (five) are categorical or continuous and not dependent on complex interactions or nonlinear effects. (b) accuracy: a low level of errors, the model achieves a high percentage of accuracy in distinguishing countries with inclination to political instability, compared to countries with political stability, (c) generality: the model allows to distinguish types of political instability, both resulting from acts of violence and failure of democracies to show, and (d) novelty: the model incorporates a tool that helps evaluate and exclude many variables used by the conventional literature. This approach is mainly based on the recognition of state structures and the relations between elites and parties

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• English Title: political stability and tax power
• Language: Spanish
• Keywords: Taxation, Political Stability, Connection, Effects, Panel VAR analysis
• Subjects: E - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics > E6 - Macroeconomic Policy, Macroeconomic Aspects of Public Finance, and General Outlook > E62 - Fiscal Policy; E - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics > E6 - Macroeconomic Policy, Macroeconomic Aspects of Public Finance, and General Outlook > E63 - Comparative or Joint Analysis of Fiscal and Monetary Policy ; Stabilization ; Treasury Policy; H - Public Economics > H2 - Taxation, Subsidies, and Revenue; H - Public Economics > H2 - Taxation, Subsidies, and Revenue > H23 - Externalities ; Redistributive Effects ; Environmental Taxes and Subsidies; H - Public Economics > H3 - Fiscal Policies and Behavior of Economic Agents; H - Public Economics > H3 - Fiscal Policies and Behavior of Economic Agents > H30 - General; H - Public Economics > H7 - State and Local Government ; Intergovernmental Relations > H71 - State and Local Taxation, Subsidies, and Revenue

References

Aizenmana, J., Jinjarak, Y. (2008). The Collection Efficiency of The Value Added Tax: Theory and International Evidence. The Journal of International Trade & Economic Development, 17(3): 391- 410.

Arellano, M., Bover, O. (1995). Another look at the instrumental variable estimation of error component models. Journal of Econometrics, 68: 29–51.

Azzimonti, M. (2010). Barriers to Investment in Polarized Societies. MPRA Paper No. 25936, Online at http://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/25936.

Bell S. (2001). The rol of State and hierarchy of money, Cambridge Journal of Economic, 25: 149-163.

Bischoff, I., Gohout, W. (2010). The political economy of tax projections, Int Tax Public Finance 17: 133–150.

Blomquist, S., Micheletto, L., (2006). Optimal redistributive taxation when government’s and agents’ preferences differ, Journal of Public Economics, 90: 1215– 1233.

Bohn, F. (2002). Public Finance under Political Instability and Debt Conditionality. Economics Discussion Papers from University of Essex, Department of Economics, No. 540.

Buchanan, J., Brennan, G. (1980). The power to tax: Analytical Foundation of a Fiscal Constitution, Cambridge University Press.

Bussiere, M, Multer, B. (2000). Political Instability and Economic Vulnerability. International Journal of Finance & Economics, 5(4): 309-330.

Carmignani, F. (2003). Political Instability, Uncertainty and Economics. Journal of Economic Surveys, 17(1): 1-54.

Cukierman, A., Edwards, S. Tabellini, G. (1992). Seigniorage and Political Instability. The American Economic Review, 82(3): 537-555.

Collier, P. (2009a). Wars, Guns and Votes, Democracy in Dangerous Places, Harper Collins Books.

Collier, P. (2009b). The political economy of state failure”: Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 25: 219–240.

Devereux, M., Wen, J.F. (1998). Political instability, capital taxation, and growth. European Economic Review 42: 1635-1651.

Elgin, C. (2010). Political Turnover, Taxes and the Shadow Economy. Working Papers, Bogazici University, Department of Economics, No 2010/08.

Estrada, F. (2010). Devouring the Leviathan: fiscal policy and public expenditure in Colombia”, RePEc / EconPapers / Munich Personal Archive, MPRA No. 21981.

Feng, Yi (1997). Democracy, Political Stability and Economic Growth; B. J.Pol.S. 27: 391- 418.

Ghura, D., Mercereau, B. (2004). Political Instability and Growth: The Central African Republic. IMF Working Paper/04/80, African and Asia and Pacific Department.

Hamilton, J. (1994). Time series analysis. Princeton University Press.

Hammar, H., Jagers, S.C., Nordblom, K. (2008). Attitudes towards Tax Levels: A Multi-Tax Comparison, Fiscal studies, 29(4): 523–543

Hendry, D. (2001). How Economists Forecast. Understanding Economic Forecasts, ed. by D. Hendry and N. Ericsson. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, 15-41.

Love, I., Zicchino, L. (2006). Financial development and dynamic investment behavior: Evidence from panel VAR, The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, 46: 190–210.

Melo, M. (2011). Institutional Weakness and the Puzzle of Argentina's Low Taxation. Latin American Politics and Society, 49(4): 115-148.

Nkurunziza, J. (2005). Political Instability, Inflation Tax and Asset Substitution in Burundi. Journal of African Development. 7(1): 42-72.

Palan, R. (2002). Tax Havens and the Commercialization of State Sovereignty, International Organization, 56(1): 155-156.

Rieth, M. (2011). Essays on Dynamic Macroeconomics: Debt, Taxation, and Policy Interaction. Dissertation zur Erlangung des akademischen Grades, Doktor rerum politicarum der Technischen Universität Dortmund.

Volkerink, B., De Haan, J. (1999). Political and institutional determinants of the tax mix: an empirical investigation for OECD countries. Research Report, from University of Groningen, Research Institute SOM (Systems, Organisations and Management), No. 99E05.

Freedom House, 1972–2011 Freedom in the World, Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.