Soldatos, Gerasimos T. (2013): Modern Social Science Concepts, Proportionate Reciprocity, Modesty, and Democracy. Published in: European Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies , Vol. 6, No. 1 (2014): pp. 15-27.
This is the latest version of this item.
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_58668.pdf Download (386kB) | Preview |
Abstract
Proportionate Reciprocity, Modesty, and Democracy, are the key concepts in Aristotle’s economics of exchange. The following correspondence of these concepts with modern social science may be contemplated: (a) Ideally, reciprocal justice in bilateral bargaining to minimize expenditure given utility levels results in Pareto-efficient, envy-free, equitable outcomes. (b) Practically, bargaining under the threat or actual recontracting may act as a surrogate of reciprocal justice, leading to an N-person contract topology. (c) But, recontracting is subject to practical limitations too, in which case near-reciprocal justice/general equilibrium outcomes may be fostered if, as a surrogate of recontracting, modesty in interaction is exhibited in an evolutionarily-stable-strategy fashion. (d) That is, incomplete recontracting amounts to asymmetric agent-type information, which in turn lays the ground for injustices; the same lack of information prevents rectificatory justice from being efficient and hence, modesty can be efficient only if it operates as a social norm and hence, only in a modest polity, which can be no other than democracy.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | Modern Social Science Concepts, Proportionate Reciprocity, Modesty, and Democracy |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | reciprocal justice, reciprocal figures, general equilibrium, modesty |
Subjects: | B - History of Economic Thought, Methodology, and Heterodox Approaches > B1 - History of Economic Thought through 1925 > B11 - Preclassical (Ancient, Medieval, Mercantilist, Physiocratic) D - Microeconomics > D5 - General Equilibrium and Disequilibrium > D51 - Exchange and Production Economies D - Microeconomics > D6 - Welfare Economics > D63 - Equity, Justice, Inequality, and Other Normative Criteria and Measurement D - Microeconomics > D7 - Analysis of Collective Decision-Making > D71 - Social Choice ; Clubs ; Committees ; Associations P - Economic Systems > P1 - Capitalist Systems > P16 - Political Economy |
Item ID: | 58668 |
Depositing User: | Gerasimos T. Soldatos |
Date Deposited: | 17 Sep 2014 14:33 |
Last Modified: | 28 Sep 2019 21:45 |
References: | Anonymous of Iamblichus, my translation from: http://www.greek-language.gr/digital Resources/ancient_greek/anthology/literature/browse.html?text_id=215. Aristotle (1894): Ethica Nicomachea. Ed. William David Ross. Oxford: Clarendon Press. Arnhart, L. (1994): “The Darwinian Biology of Aristotle’s Political Animals”. American Journal of Political Science, 38(2), 464-485. Blaug, M. (ed.) (1991): Aristotle (384–322 BC). Brookfield, Vermont: Edward Elgar. Burgess, R.L. and Bushell, D.Jr. (1969): Behavioral Sociology: The Experimental Analysis of Social Process. New York: Columbia University Press. Crespo, R. F. (2013): Philosophy of the Economy: An Aristotelian Approach. New York: Springer. Crespo, R. F. (2014): A Re-Assessment of Aristotle’s Economic Thought. London: Routledge. Cui, T.H, et al. (2007): “Fairness and Channel Coordination”. Management Science, 53(8), 1303-1314. Falk, A. et al. (2005): “Driving Forces Behind Informal Sanctions”. Econometrica, 73(6), 2017-2030. Fehr, E. and Gachter, S. (2000): “Fairness and Retaliation: The Economics of Reciprocity”. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 14(3), 159-183. Flew, A., (ed.) (1979): “Golden Rule” in A Dictionary of Philosophy. London: Pan Books. Gordon, B. (1975): Economic Analysis before Adam Smith: Hesiod to Lessius. London: MacMillan. Gouldner, A. W. (1960): “The Norm of Reciprocity: A Preliminary Statement”. American Sociological Review, 25(2), 161-178. Grant, A. (1885): The Ethics of Aristotle. London: Longmans, Green. Guttman, J. M. (2003): “Repeated Interaction and the Evolution of Preferences for Reciprocity”. Economic Journal, 113, No.489 (July 2003), 631-656. Jaffe, W. (1974): “Edgeworth’s Contract Curve, Part 2. Two Figures in its Protohistory, Aristotle and Gossen”. History of Political Economy, 6(3), 381-404. Jaffe, W. (1977): “The Normative Bias of the Walrasian Model: Walras Versus Gossen”. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 91(3), 371-387. Jill, F. (2005): A Democracy of Distinction: Aristotle and the Wotk of Politics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Kahneman, D. et al. (1986): “Fairness and the Assumptions of Economics”. Journal of Business, 59(4), (Part 2: The Behavioral Foundations of Economic Theory), 285-300. Lewis, T.J. (1978): “Acquisition and Anxiety: Aristotle's Case against the Market”. Canadian Journal of Economics, 11(1), 69-90. Lubell, M. and Scholz, J.T. (2001): “Cooperation, Reciprocity, and the Collective-Action Heuristic”. American Journal of Political Science, 45(1), 160-178. MacCormack, G. (1976): “Reciprocity”. Man, New Series, 11(1), 89-103. Meikle, S. (1995). Aristotle’s Economic Thought. Oxford: Clarendon Press. Mises L., von (1963 [1949]): Human Action, A Treatise On Economics. 4th edition, San Francisco: Fox and Wilkes. Moller, A. (2000): Naukratis: Trade in Archaic Greece. New York: Oxford University Press. Molm, L. (2010): “The Structure of Reciprocity”. Social Psychology Quarterly, 73(2), 119-131. Ostrom, E. (2000): “Collective Action and the Evolution of Social Norms”. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 14(3), 137-158. Pack, S. J. (2008): “Aristotle’s Difficult Relationship With Modern Economic Theory”. Foundations of Science, 13, 265-280. Ross, W.D. (1923): Aristotle. London: Metheun. Rothbard M. N. (1987): “Catallactics”. In Eatwell et al (eds), vol.1, 377-378, The New Palgrave: A Dictionary of Economics, London, Macmillan. Schumpeter, J.A. (1954): History of Economic Analysis. Ed. by E. Boody Schumpeter, Oxford: Oxford University Press. Simpson, R. (1804): The Elements of Euclid; viz. The First Six Books, together with the Eleventh and Twelfth. 12th ed., London: Wingrave. Stewart, J.A. (1973): Notes on the Nicomachean Ethics of Aristotle. New York: Arno Press. Staveren, I. V. (2001): The Values of Economics: An Aristotelian Perspective. London: Routledge. Theocarakis, N.J. (2006): “Nicomachean Ethics in Political Economy: The Trajectory of the Problem of Value”. History of Economic Ideas, 14(1), 9-53. Trevett, J.C. (2001): “Coinage and democracy at Athens”. In K. Shipton and A. Meadows (ed.) Money and its Uses in the Ancient Greek World (Oxford, 2001) 23-34. Van Johnson. (1939): “Aristotle’s Theory of Value”. American Journal of Philology, 60(4), 445-451. Walras, L. (1969 [1874]): Elements d'Economie Politique pure ou Theorie de la Richesse Sociale. New York: Augustus Kelley; 1st ed. (in two installments) (Lausanne: Corbaz, 1874-1877). Winthrop, D. (1978): “Aristotle and Theories of Justice”. American Political Science Review, 72(4), 1201-1216. |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/58668 |
Available Versions of this Item
-
Modern Social Science Concepts, Proportionate Reciprocity, Modesty, and Democracy. (deposited 30 May 2014 03:35)
- Modern Social Science Concepts, Proportionate Reciprocity, Modesty, and Democracy. (deposited 17 Sep 2014 14:33) [Currently Displayed]