Szarowska, Irena (2013): Relationship between government expenditure and output in the problematic regions in the European Union. Published in: Economy of region No. 4 (December 2013): pp. 190-199.
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_59777.pdf Download (402kB) | Preview |
Abstract
Economic and debt crisis has increased the attention paid to the development of government expenditure in problematic regions in the European Union. The goal of the article is to provide direct empirical evidence on cyclicality and the long-term and short-term relationship between government expenditure and output in the Portugal, Ireland, Italy, Greece and Spain in a period 1995-2011. We have applied Johansen cointegration test and the error correction model on adjusted annual data of GDP and government expenditure in compliance with the COFOG international standard. Research confirms procyclical development of government expenditure functions on GDP in the selected countries; this procyclicality is in line with development typical for developing countries. Moreover, output and government expenditure are cointegrated for at least six of the expenditure categories in every country and it implies a long-term relationship between government expenditure and output consistent with Wagner’s law. The values of the coefficients for the short-run relationship between expenditure and output confirm the voracity hypothesis, as they suggest that in response to a given shock to real GDP, government expenditure rises by even more in percentage points.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | Relationship between government expenditure and output in the problematic regions in the European Union |
English Title: | Relationship between government expenditure and output in the problematic regions in the European Union |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | government expenditure, cyclicality, voracity effect, Wagner´s law, COFOG classification, long-run elasticity, short-run elasticity |
Subjects: | C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C3 - Multiple or Simultaneous Equation Models ; Multiple Variables > C32 - Time-Series Models ; Dynamic Quantile Regressions ; Dynamic Treatment Effect Models ; Diffusion Processes ; State Space Models E - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics > E6 - Macroeconomic Policy, Macroeconomic Aspects of Public Finance, and General Outlook > E62 - Fiscal Policy E - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics > E6 - Macroeconomic Policy, Macroeconomic Aspects of Public Finance, and General Outlook > E63 - Comparative or Joint Analysis of Fiscal and Monetary Policy ; Stabilization ; Treasury Policy H - Public Economics > H5 - National Government Expenditures and Related Policies > H50 - General |
Item ID: | 59777 |
Depositing User: | Irena Szarowska |
Date Deposited: | 11 Nov 2014 15:28 |
Last Modified: | 27 Sep 2019 13:39 |
References: | A. Abbott, P. Jones: Procyclical government spending: Patterns of pressure and prudence in the OECD, Economics Letters 111 (2011), 230–232. B. Akitoby, B. Clements, S. Gupta, G. Inchauste: Public spending, voracity, and Wagner's law in developing countries, European Journal of Political Economy 22, (2006), 908–924. A. Alesina, F.R. Campante, G. Tabellini: Why is fiscal policy often procyclical? Journal of the European Economic Association 6 (2008), 1006–1030. M. Cletsos, C. Kollias: Testing Wagner’s Law using disaggregated data in the case of Greece: 1958-93, Applied Economics 29 (1997), 371–377. R.F. Engle, C.W.J. Granger: Co-integration and error-correction: representation, estimation and testing, Econometrica 55 (1987), 251–276. N. Ericsson, J. Mckinnon: Finite sample properties of error correction tests for cointegration, Econometrics Journal 5 (2002), 285–318. R. Fiorito, T. Kollintzas: Stylized facts of business cycles in the G7 from a real business cycles perspective, European Economic Review 38 (1994), 235–269. M. Florio, S. Colautti: A Logistic Growth Theory of Public Expenditures: A Study of Five Countries over 100 Years, Public Choice 122 (2005), 355–393. J. Galí: Government size and macroeconomic stability, European Economic Review 38 (1994), 117–132. G. Ganelli: The International Effects of Government Spending Composition, Economic Modelling 27 (2010), 631–640. M. Gavin, R. Hausmann, R. Perotti, E. Talvi: Managing Fiscal Policy in Latin America and the Caribbean: Volatility, Procyclicality, and Limited Creditworthiness, IDB Working Paper No. 326 (1996). M. Gavin, R. Perotti: Fiscal policy in Latin America, Macroeconomics Annual 12 (1997), 11–70. Z. Hercowitz, M. Strawczynski: Cyclical Ratcheting in Government Spending: Evidence from the OECD, Review of Economics and Statistics 86 (2004), 353–361. S. Johansen: Statistical analysis of cointegration vectors, Journal of Economics Dynamics and Control 12 (1988), 231–254. S. Johansen: Cointegration and Hypothesis Testing of Cointegration Vectors in Gaussian Vector Autoregressive Models, Econometrica 59 (1991), 1551–1580. G.L. Kaminsky, C.M. Reinhart, C. A. Vegh: When it Rains, it Pours: Procyclical Capital Flows and Macroeconomic Policies, Nber Macoeconomics Annual (2004), 11–53. S. Karagianni, M. Pempetzoglou, S. Strikou: Testing Wagner’s Law For The European Union Economies, The Journal of Applied Business Research 18 (2002), 107–114. A. Kraay, L. Serven: Fiscal Policy Response to the Current Financial Crisis: Issues for Developing Countries, World Bank Research, Washington, DC, 2008. S. Lamartina, A. Zaghini: Increasing Public Expenditures: Wagner’s Law in OECD Countries, Center for Financial Studies Working Papers No. 13 (2008). P.R. Lane: International Perspectives on the Irish Economy, Economic and Social Review 29 (1998), 217-222. P.R. Lane: The Cyclical Behaviour of Fiscal Policy: Evidence from the OECD, Journal of Public Economics 87 (2003), 2661–2675. C. Magazzino: Wagner’s Law and Augmented Wagner’s Law in EU-27. A Time-Series Analysis on Stationarity, Cointegration and Causality, International Research Journal of Finance and Economics 89 (2012), 205–220. C. Magazzino: “Wagner’s Law” in Italy: Empirical Evidence from 1960 to 2008, Global & Local Economic Review 14 (2010), 91–116. M. Mutascu, M. Milos: Optimal Size of Government Spending. The Case of European Union Member States, Annales Universitatis Apulensis Series Oeconomica 11 (2009), 447–456. A. Peacock, A. Scott: The curious attraction of Wagner's law, Public Choice 102 (2000), 1–17. A.S. Rajkumar, V. Swaroop: Public Spending and Outcomes: Does Governance Matter? Journal of Development Economics 86 (2008), 96–111. I. Szarowská: Public Spending Cyclicality and Wagner’s Law in Central and Eastern European Countries, Acta Universitatis Agriculturae et Silviculturae Mendeleianae Brunensis 60 (2012), 383–390. E. Talvi, C.A. Vegh: Tax base variability and procyclical fiscal policy in developing countrie, Journal of Development Economics 78 (2005), 156–190. J. Thornton: Cointegration, Causality and Wagner’s Law in 19th Century Europe, Applied Economic Letters 6 (1999), 413–416. A. Wagner: Staat in nationalökonomischer Hinsicht. Handwörterbuch der Staatswissenschaften. Jena: Fischer, 1911, pp. 743–745. |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/59777 |