Time Preference Shocks

Harashima, Taiji (2014): Time Preference Shocks.

Abstract

The rate of time preference (RTP) has traditionally not been regarded as an important source of economic fluctuations. In this paper, I show that it is an important factor influencing economic fluctuations because households must have an expected RTP for the representative household (RTP RH) to behave optimally. Because it is impossible for a household to know the intrinsic RTP RH, it cannot know the parameters of the structural model of the RTP RH. Without a structural model, a household must use its beliefs to generate an expected RTP RH. As a result, the expected value can change more frequently than the intrinsic RTP RH. Because households often change their beliefs about their expected future paths, economic fluctuations caused by time preference shocks also can occur more frequently in an economy than previously thought.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: Time preference; Economic fluctuations; Business cycles; The representative household; Sustainable heterogeneity
• Subjects: D - Microeconomics > D9 - Intertemporal Choice > D90 - General; E - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics > E1 - General Aggregative Models > E13 - Neoclassical; E - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics > E3 - Prices, Business Fluctuations, and Cycles > E32 - Business Fluctuations ; Cycles

References

Antonelli, Giovanni Battista. (1886) Sulla Teoria Matematica Della Economia Politica, Pisa, Tipografia del Falchetto.

Barsky, Robert B. and Eric R. Sims. (2012) “Information, Animal Spirits, and the Meaning of Innovations in Consumer Confidence,” American Economic Review, Vol. 102, No. 4. pp. 1343-77.

Becker, Gary S. and Casey Mulligan (1997) “The Endogenous Determination of Time Preference,” Quarterly Journal of Economics, Vol. 112, No. 3, pp. 729–758.

Becker, Robert A. (1980) “On the Long-run Steady State in a Simple Dynamic Model of Equilibrium with Heterogeneous Households,” The Quarterly Journal of Economics, Vol. 95, No. 2, pp. 375–382.

Böhm-Bawerk, Eugen von (1889) Capital and Interest, Reprinted by Libertarian Press, South Holland, IL, 1970.

Das, Mausumi. (2003) “Optimal Growth with Decreasing Marginal Impatience,” Journal of Economic Dynamics & Control, Vol. 27, No. 10, pp. 1881–1898.

Epstein, Larry G. and J. Allan Hynes (1983) “The Rate of Time Preference and Dynamic Economic Analysis,” Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 91, No. 4, pp. 611-635.

Fisher, Irving (1930) The Theory of Interest, Macmillan, New York

Frederick, Shane, George Loewenstein and Ted O’Donoghue (2002) “Time Discounting and Time Preference: A Critical Review,” Journal of Economic Literature, Vol. 40, No. 2, pp. 351-401.

Harashima, Taiji (2004) “A More Realistic Endogenous Time Preference Model and the Slump in Japan,” EconWPA Working Papers, ewp-mac0402015.

Harashima, Taiji (2010) “Sustainable Heterogeneity: Inequality, Growth, and Social Welfare in a Heterogeneous Population,” MPRA (The Munich Personal RePEc Archive) Paper, No. 24233.

Harashima, Taiji. (2012) “Sustainable Heterogeneity as the Unique Socially Optimal Allocation for Almost All Social Welfare Functions,” MPRA (The Munich Personal RePEc Archive) Paper, No. 40938.

Harashima, Taiji (2014) “The Representative Household Assumption Requires Sustainable Heterogeneity in Dynamic Models,” MPRA (The Munich Personal RePEc Archive) Paper, No. 57520.

Lawrance, Emily C. (1991) “Poverty and the Rate of Time Preference: Evidence from Panel Data,” Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 99, No. 1, pp. 54–77.

Lucas, Robert E., Jr. and Nancy L. Stokey (1984) “Optimal Growth with Many Consumers,” Journal of Economic Theory, Vol. 32, pp. 139-171.

Obstfeld, Maurice (1990) “Intertemporal Dependence, Impatience, and Dynamics,” Journal of Monetary Economics, Vol. 26, No. 1, pp. 45-75.

Parkin, Michael (1988) “A Method for Determining Whether Parameters in Aggregative Models Are Structural,” Carnegie-Rochester Conference Series on Public Policy, Vol. 29, No. 1, pp. 215–252.

Samuelson, Paul (1937) “A Note on Measurement of Utility,” Review of Economic Studies, Vol. 4, No. 2, pp. 155–161.

Samwick, Andrew A. (1998) “Discount Rate Heterogeneity and Social Security Reform,” Journal of Development Economics, Vol. 57, No. 1, pp. 117–146.

Uzawa, Hirofumi. (1968) “Time Preference, the Consumption Function, and Optimal Asset Holdings,” in Value, Capital, and Growth: Papers in Honour of Sir John Hicks (J. N. Wolfe ed.), University of Edinburgh Press, Edinburgh, Scotland.

Ventura, Luigi. (2003) “Direct Measure of Time-preference,” Economic and Social Review, Vol. 34, No. 3, pp. 293–310.