System Trust and Cooperation: The Case of Recycling Behavior

Rompf, Stephan Alexander (2014): System Trust and Cooperation: The Case of Recycling Behavior.

Abstract

Abstract: In this paper, I develop and test the hypothesis that system trust – trust in the reliability, ef-fectiveness, and legitimacy of social institutions – promotes cooperation in social dilemmas and the provision of public goods, focusing then on the example of recycling. I discuss three models that can explain recycling behavior (rational choice, low-cost hypothesis, dual-process theory) and show how they link incentives and attitudes. All three models claim that incentives are an important factor mediating the attitude-behavior link, but they develop con-tradicting hypotheses about the direction of this effect. I use survey data collected by Sønderskov and Daugbjerg (2011) to advance an empirical test. I find a positive and significant interaction between the attitude of system trust and recycling costs, as well as a negative and significant interaction between system trust and recycling benefits. The data rule out the rational choice and low-cost hypothesis explanation of recycling behavior. Instead, they indicate that attitudes moderate the impact of the incentive structure, increasing cooperation in collective action dilemmas irrespective of the costs associated with compliance.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: system trust, cooperation, recycling, rational choice, low-cost hypothesis, adaptive rationality
• Subjects: D - Microeconomics > D8 - Information, Knowledge, and Uncertainty > D87 - Neuroeconomics; G - Financial Economics > G0 - General > G02 - Behavioral Finance: Underlying Principles; Z - Other Special Topics > Z1 - Cultural Economics ; Economic Sociology ; Economic Anthropology > Z13 - Economic Sociology ; Economic Anthropology ; Social and Economic Stratification

References

Best, Henning, and Thorsten Kneip. 2011. "The Impact of Attitudes and Behavioral Costs on Environmental Behavior: A Natural Experiment on Household Waste Recycling." Social Science Research 40:917-930.

Best, Henning, and Clemens Kroneberg. 2012. "Die Low-Cost-Hypothese: Theoretische Grundlagen und Empirische Implikationen." Kölner Zeitschrift für Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie (forthcoming).

Chaiken, Shelly, and Yaacov Trope. 1999. Dual-Process Theories in Social Psychology. New York, London: The Guilford Press.

Charness, Gary, and Martin Dufwenberg. 2006. "Promises and Partnership." Econometrica 74(6):1579-1601.

Diekmann, Andreas, and Peter Preisendörfer. 2003. "Green and Greenback: The Behavioral Effects of Environmental Attitudes in Low-Cost and High-Cost Situations." Rationality and Society 15(4):441-472.

Esser, Hartmut. 2001. Soziologie. Spezielle Grundlagen. Band 6: Sinn und Kultur. Frankfurt a. Main (a.o.): Campus.

Giddens, Anthony. 1990. The Consequences of Modernity. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

Gintis, Herbert. 2007. "A Framework for the Unification of the Behavioral Sciences." Behavioral and Brain Sciences 30(1):1-61.

Kroneberg, Clemens. 2011. Die Erklärung sozialen Handelns. Grundlagen und Anwendungen einer integrativen Theorie. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag.

Lewis, J. David, and Andrew J. Weigert. 1985a. "Social Atomism, Holism, and Trust." The Sociological Quarterly 26(4):455-471.

Lewis, J. David, and Andrew J. Weigert. 1985b. "Trust as a Social Reality." Social Forces 63(4):967-985.

Luhmann, Niklas. 1979. Trust and Power. Chichester (a.o.): John Wiley & Sons.

McKnight, Harrison D., Larry L. Cummings, and Norman L. Chervany. 1998. “Initial Trust Formation in New Organizational Relationships.” Academy of Management Review 23(3):473-490.

Mehlkop, Guido and Peter Graeff. 2010. “Modeling a Rational Choice Theory of Criminal Action: Subjective Expected Utilities, Norms, and Interactions.” Rationality and Society 22(2):189-222.

Misztal, Barbara A. 1996. Trust in Modern Societies. Cambridge: Polity Press.

Misztal, Barbara A. 2001. "Normality and Trust in Goffman´s Theory of Interaction Order." Sociological Theory 19(3):312-324.

Möllering, Guido. 2006. Trust: Reason, Routine, Reflexivity. Amsterdam (a.o.): Elsevier.

Opp, Karl-Dieter, 1999. “Contending Conceptions of the Theory of Rational Action.” Jour-nal of theoretical Politics 11(2):171-202.

Shapiro, Susan P. 1987. "The Social Control of Impersonal Trust." American Journal of So-ciology 93(3):623-658.

Sønderskov, Kim M. 2011. "Explaining Large-N Cooperation: Generalized Social Trust and the Social Exchange Heuristic." Rationality and Society 23(1):51-74.

Sønderskov, Kim M., and Carsten Daugbjerg, 2011. “The State and Consumer Confidence in Eco-Labeling: Organic Labeling in Denmark, Sweden, The United Kingdom and The United States,” Agriculture and Human Values 28 (4), 507-517.

Steg, and Charles Vlek. 2009. "Encouraging Pro-Environmental Behavior: An Integrative Review and Research Agenda." Journal of Environmental Psychology 29(3):309-317.

Stern, Nicholas. 2007. The Economics of Climate Change. The Stern Review. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. IPCC. 2007. Climate Change 2007. Four Volumes. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Yamagishi, Toshio, Shigeru Terai, Toko Kiyonari, Nobuhiro Mifune, and Satoshi Kanazawa. 2007. "The Social Exchange Heuristic: Managing Errors in Social Exchange." Ra-tionality and Society 19(3):259-291.

Zucker, Lynne G. 1986. "Production of Trust: Institutional Sources of Economic Structure: 1840-1920." Pp. 53-111 in Research in Organizational Behavior, Vol. 8, edited by Barry M. Staw, and Larry L. Cummings. Greenwich, London: JAI Press.