Cahuana-Hurtado, Lucero and Rubalcava-Peñafiel, Luis and Sosa-Rubi, Sandra (2012): Políticas fiscales como herramienta para la prevención de sobrepeso y obesidad. Published in: Obesidad en México: recomendaciones para una política de Estado. Edited by Rivera J. et al. Mexico City: Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México (January 2013): pp. 211-224.
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_61288.pdf Download (3MB) | Preview |
Abstract
One of three adults in Mexico is obese, therefore, policies to reduce overweight and obesity prevalence in the country were designed. The use of fiscal policy was proposed as a way to discourage the consumption of soft drinks and raise funds to pay health services used by obese patients. The aim of this chapter, published in 2012, was to open the debate on the use of fiscal policy as a tool for the prevention of overweight and obesity in Mexico. Arguments for and against fiscal policies are discussed and outlined. The case of the soft drinks market is examined and the challenges for the design and implementation of a tax policy are discussed. The evidence presented in this chapter shows that tax policies are just one of the many tools that can be used to modify the consumption of unhealthy foods and beverages. However, its effect is limited if not accompanied by other measures, such as improving access and availability of healthy goods, advertising, and product labeling.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | Políticas fiscales como herramienta para la prevención de sobrepeso y obesidad |
English Title: | Fiscal policies to prevent obesity in Mexico |
Language: | Spanish |
Keywords: | Taxes; Fiscal policy; beverages; Mexico |
Subjects: | E - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics > E6 - Macroeconomic Policy, Macroeconomic Aspects of Public Finance, and General Outlook > E62 - Fiscal Policy H - Public Economics > H0 - General > H00 - General H - Public Economics > H2 - Taxation, Subsidies, and Revenue > H20 - General H - Public Economics > H3 - Fiscal Policies and Behavior of Economic Agents > H30 - General I - Health, Education, and Welfare > I1 - Health > I18 - Government Policy ; Regulation ; Public Health |
Item ID: | 61288 |
Depositing User: | Lucero Cahuana-Hurtado |
Date Deposited: | 16 Feb 2015 23:06 |
Last Modified: | 29 Sep 2019 02:55 |
References: | 1. Secretaría de Salud. Acuerdo Nacional para la Salud Alimentaria. México, 2010. 2. World Health Organization. Estrategia Mundial por la Alimentación Saludable, la actividad física y salud. Washington, DC, World Health Organization, 2006. Disponible en: http://www.who.int/dietphysicalactivity/strategy/eb11344/strategy_spanish_web.pdf. 3. Organización Panamericana de la Salud. Estrategia Mundial sobre Alimentación Saludable, Actividad Física y Salud (dpas). Plan de implementación en América Latina y el Caribe. 2006-2007. Disponible en: http://www.paho.org/spanish/ad/dpc/nc/dpas-plan-imp-alc.pdf. 4. Nugent R. y F. Knaul. Fiscal Policies for Health Promotion and Disease Prevention, en Jamison. Disease control priorities. Disponible en: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK11714/pdf/ch11.pdf 5. World Bank. A User’s Guide to Poverty and Social Impact Analysis. Washington, DC: The International Bank for Reconstruction and Development/The World Bank, 2003. 6. Rodríguez-Caro A. y B. González. El trasfondo económico de las intervenciones sanitarias en la prevención de la obesidad. Rev Esp Salud Pública. 2009, 83: 25-41. 7. Joshipura, Kaumadi J., A. Aschjerio et al., Fruit and vegetable intake in relation to risk of ischemic stroke. Journal of the American Medical Association. 1999, 282: 1233-1239. 8. Liu S., Manson J.E., Lee I.M., Cole S.R., Hennekens C.H., Willett W.C. y J.E. Buring. Fruit and vegetable intake and risk of cardiovascular disease: the women’s health study. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition. 2000 (72): 922-928. 9. Finkelstein E.A., Ruhm C.J. y K.M. Kosa. Economic causes and consequences of obesity. Annu. Rev. Public Health. 2005, 26: 239-257 10. Instituto Nacional de Estadística, Geografía e Informática. ENIGH 2010. Nueva construcción. Tabulados básicos –descarga. Disponible en: http://www.inegi.org.mx/Sistemas/TabuladosBasicos2/tabdirecto.aspx?s=est&c =27895. 11. World Health Organization. World Health Report 2000. Geneva: WHO, 2001. 12. Branca F., Nikogosian H. y T. Lobstein. The challenge of obesity in the who European region and the strategies for response. Copenhagen: World Health Organization Europe, 2007. 13. Sassi F. Obesity and the economics of prevention. Fit not fat. OECD, 2010. 14. Kim D. y I. Kawachi. Food taxation and pricing strategies to “thin out” the obesity epidemic. Am J Prev Med. 2006; 30 (5): 430-437. 15. Cawley J. Markets and childhood obesity policy. The future of children. 2006, 16 (1): 69-88. 16. Powell L.M. y Chaloupka F.J. Food prices and obesity: evidence and policy implications for taxes and subsidies. Milbank Q. 2009, 87 (1): 229-257. 17. Fomento Económico Mexicano, Reporte anual que se presenta de acuerdo con las disposiciones de carácter general aplicables a las emisoras de valores y otros participantes del mercado, correspondiente al ejercicio fiscal terminado el 31 de diciembre de 2009. Disponible en: http://files.shareholder.com/downloads/FEMSAS/1142124240x0x385898/F6B15B81-DB21-4316-9AD3-EDDEE87AC94B/4_RA_FEMSA_2009_low.pdf. 18. Secretaría de Salud. Boletín de Información Estadística 28, 2009. vol. IV: Recursos financieros. México, Secretaría de Salud, 2010. 19. Smed S., Jensen J.D. y S. Denver. Socio-economic characteristics and the effect of taxation as a health policy instrument. Food Policy. 2007; 32 (5-6): 624-639. 20. Jensen J.D. y S. Smed. Cost-effective design of economic instruments in nutrition policy. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2007; 4: 10. 21. Powell L.M., Chriqui J. y F.J. Chaloupka. Associations between state-level soda taxes and adolescent body mass index. Journal of Adolescent Health. 2009; 45: S57-S63. 22. Fletcher J.M., Frisvold D. y N. Tefft. The effects of soft drink taxes on child and adolescent consumption and weight outcomes. RWJF Scholar in Health Policy Research Working Paper Series, WP 4, agosto, 2009. 23. Fletcher J.M., Frisvold D. y N. Tefft. Taxing soft drinks and restricting access to vending machines to curb child obesity. Health Affairs. 2010, 29 (5): 1059-1066. 24. Nnoaham K.E., Sacks G., Rayner M., Mytton O. y A. Gray. Modelling income group differences in the health and economic impacts of targeted food taxes and subsidies. Int Journal Epidemiology. 2009, 38: 1324-1333. 25. Sturm R., Powel L.M., Chriqui J.F. y F.J. Chaloupka. Soda taxes, soft drink consumption and children’s body mass index. Health Affairs. 2010; 29 (5): 1052-1058. 26. Finkelstein E.A., Zhen C, Nonnemaker J. y J.E. Todd. Impact of targeted beverage taxes on higher- and lower income households. Arch Intern Med. 2010; 170 (22): 2028-2034. 27. Cash S.B., Sunding D.L. y D. Zilberman. Fat taxes and thin subsidies: prices, diet, and health outcomes. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Agricultural Economics Association. Denver, 2004, agosto, 1-4. 28. Chouinard H.H., Davis D.E., LaFrance J.T. y J.M. Perloff. Fat taxes: big money for small change. Forum for Health Economics & Policy. 2007, 10 (2). 29. Merino M. Los programas de subsidios al campo. Las razones y sinrazones de una política mal diseñada. Documentos de trabajo cide núm. 229. México, Centro de Investigación y Docencia Económicas, 2009. 30. Scott J. The incidence of agricultural subsidies in Mexico. Documentos de trabajo cide núm. 473. México, Centro de Investigación y Docencia Económicas, 2009. 31. Fox J. y L. Haight. Subsidios para la desigualdad. Las políticas públicas del maíz en México a partir del libre comercio. México, Centro de Investigación y Docencia Económicas/Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars, 2010. 32. Consejo Nacional de Evaluación de la Política de Desarrollo Social (Coneval). Dimensiones de la seguridad alimentaria: evaluación estratégica de nutrición y abasto. México, 2010. 33. Asociación Nacional de Productores de Refrescos y Aguas Carbonatadas, A.C. http://www.anprac.org.mx/estadisticas.html Último acceso: febrero 11, 2011. 34. TEC Monterrey. El mercado de refrescos (monografía). 35. Asociación Nacional de Productores de Refrescos y Aguas Carbonatadas (ANPRAC). La industria de refrescos y aguas carbonatadas en 2008. 36. Barquera S., Campirano F., Bonvecchio A., Hernández-Barrera L., Rivera J.A. y B. Popkin. Caloric beverage consumption patterns in Mexican children. Nutrition Journal. 2010, 9: 47. 37. Calderón-Madrid A. Elasticidades precio e ingreso de la demanda de alimentos en México con base a datos de la Encuesta Nacional de Ingreso y Gasto de los Hogares de 1998. Febrero, 2002. Centro de Estudios Económicos. El Colegio de México, 2002. 38. Valero-Gil J.N. Estimación de elasticidades e impuestos óptimos a los bienes más consumidos en México. Estudios económicos. 21 (2), 2006. 39. Urzúa C.M. Evaluación de los efectos distributivos y espaciales de las empresas con poder de mercado en México. México, Tecnológico de Monterrey, 2008. 40. Thow A.M., Quested C., Juventin L., Kun R., Khan A.N. y B. Swinburn. Taxing soft drinks in the Pacific:implementation lessons for improving health. Health Promotion International. 2010; 26 (1): 55-64. 41. Jacobson M.F. y K.D. Brownell. Small taxes on soft drinks and snack foods to promote health. Am J Public Health. 2000, 90: 854-857. 42. McColl K. “Fat taxes” and the financial crisis. Lancet. 2009, 373: 797-798. 43. Chriqui J.F. y F.J. Chaloupka. Price, food consumption and obesity. Fifth conference on public health, law and obesity. Septiembre 20, 2008. 44. González-Zapata L.I., Álvarez-Dardet C., Millstone E., Clemente-Gómez V., Holdworth M., Ortiz-Moncada R. et al. The potential role of taxes and subsidies on food in the prevention of obesity in Europe. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2010, 64: 696e-704. |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/61288 |