Halkos, George and Paizanos, Epameinondas (2015): Effects of Macroeconomic Policy on Air Quality: Evidence from the US.
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_62001.pdf Download (320kB) | Preview |
Abstract
This paper examines the effect of economic policy on air quality using US quarterly data from 1973 to 2013. In particular, we analyze the short-run as well as the long-run interactions between fiscal and monetary policy with CO2 emissions, employing time series techniques of co-integration, Granger multivariate causality and vector error-correction modeling. To take into account possible variations of the effect of economic policy according to the sources of pollution, we distinguish between industrial and residential inflicted CO2 emissions. In addition, we construct the impulse responses to three linear combinations of fiscal shocks, corresponding to the three scenarios of deficit-spending, deficit-financed tax cuts and a balanced budget spending expansion. Policy implications from the results vary depending on the source of CO2 emissions.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | Effects of Macroeconomic Policy on Air Quality: Evidence from the US |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | Fiscal policy; monetary policy; environment. |
Subjects: | E - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics > E5 - Monetary Policy, Central Banking, and the Supply of Money and Credit > E52 - Monetary Policy E - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics > E6 - Macroeconomic Policy, Macroeconomic Aspects of Public Finance, and General Outlook > E62 - Fiscal Policy Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics ; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q5 - Environmental Economics > Q53 - Air Pollution ; Water Pollution ; Noise ; Hazardous Waste ; Solid Waste ; Recycling Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics ; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q5 - Environmental Economics > Q54 - Climate ; Natural Disasters and Their Management ; Global Warming Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics ; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q5 - Environmental Economics > Q56 - Environment and Development ; Environment and Trade ; Sustainability ; Environmental Accounts and Accounting ; Environmental Equity ; Population Growth |
Item ID: | 62001 |
Depositing User: | G.E. Halkos |
Date Deposited: | 09 Feb 2015 15:02 |
Last Modified: | 27 Sep 2019 12:40 |
References: | Bernauer, T., Koubi, V., 2006. States as Providers of Public Goods: How Does Government Size Affect Environmental Quality? Available at SSRN, http://ssrn.com/abstract=900487 Frederik, C., Lundström, S., 2001. Political and Economic Freedom and the Environment: The Case of CO2 Emissions. Working Paper in Economics no. 29. University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg. Fullerton, D., S-R. Kim. 2008, Environmental Investment and Policy with Distortionary Taxes, and Endogenous Growth, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 56(2): 141-154. Galinato, G.I., Islam, F., 2014. The Challenge of Addressing Consumption Pollutants with Fiscal Policy. Working Paper Series WP 2014-1. Washington State University, Washington. Grossman, G., Krueger, A., 1995. Economic growth and the environment. Quarterly Journal of Economics 110: 353–377. Halkos, G., 2003. Environmental Kuznets Curve for sulfur: evidence using GMM estimation and random coefficient panel data models. Environment and Development Economics 8: 581-601. Halkos, G., 2006. Econometrics: Theory and practice. Giourdas Publications. Halkos, G., 2011. Econometrics: Theory and Practice: Instructions in using Eviews, Minitab, SPSS and Excel. Gutenberg. Halkos, G., Paizanos, E., 2013. The effect of government expenditure on the environment: An empirical investigation. Ecological Economics 91: 48-56. Heyes, A., 2000. A proposal for the greening of textbook macro: ‘IS-LM-EE’. Ecological Economics 32: 1-7. Inmaculada, M.Z., Aurelia, B.M., 2004. Pooled Mean Group Estimation of an Environmental Kuznets Curve for CO2. Economic Letters 82: 121-126. Islam, F., Lopez, R., 2013. Government Spending and Air Pollution in the US, Working Paper 13-02, University of Maryland, Maryland. Lawn, P.A., 2003. Environmental Macroeconomics: Extending the IS-LM Model to Include an ‘Environmental Equilibrium’ Curve. Australian Economic Papers 42 (1): 118-134. López,R. V. Thomas, Y. Wang. 2008. The Quality of Growth: Fiscal Policies for Better Results, IEG Working Paper, 2008. Lopez, R., Galinato, G.I, Islam, F., 2011. Fiscal spending and the environment: Theory and empirics. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 62: 180-198. Lopez, R.E., Palacios, A., 2014. Why has Europe become Environmentally Cleaner? Decomposing the Roles of Fiscal, Trade and Environmental Policies. Environmental and Resource Economics 58(1): 91-108. Lopez, R.E., Palacios, A., 2010. Have Government Spending and Energy Tax Policies Contributed to make Europe Environmentally Cleaner? Working Paper 94795. University of Maryland, Maryland. McAusland, C., 2008. Trade, Politics, and the Environment: Tailpipe vs. Smokestack. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 55(1): 52-71. Mountford, A., Uhlig, H., 2009. What are the effects of fiscal policy shocks. Journal of Applied Econometrics 24: 960-992. Sim, N.C.S., 2006. Environmental Keynesian Macroeconomics: Some further discussion. Ecological Economics 59: 401-405. Zimmerman, Rae, 2005. Mass Transit Infrastructure and Urban Health. Journal of Urban Health 82(1): 21-32. |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/62001 |