Governments Should Not Use Declining Discount Rates in Project Analysis

Szekeres, Szabolcs (2015): Governments Should Not Use Declining Discount Rates in Project Analysis.

Abstract

A number of governments have already adopted the policy of applying Declining Discount Rates (DDRs) to long lived projects, a move that could affect public sector investment decisions. Arguments for the use of Declining Discount Rates are based on the consideration of uncertainty, both for discount rates derived from social welfare functions, and for those derived from the characteristics of capital markets. The case for the latter is based on Martin L. Weitzman’s assertion that certainty equivalent discount rates are a declining function of time and tend to the lowest possible interest rate when interest rates are stochastic but perfectly auto-correlated. This paper finds that this conclusion is the consequence of Weitzman’s use of time reversed negative compounding, rather than of discounting, in the definition of net present value. When discounting is used instead, Weitzman’s conclusions are reversed, and do not support the use of Declining Discount Rates.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: Discount rate, uncertainty, declining discount rate, benefit-cost analysis, negative compounding
• Subjects: D - Microeconomics > D6 - Welfare Economics > D61 - Allocative Efficiency ; Cost-Benefit Analysis; H - Public Economics > H4 - Publicly Provided Goods > H43 - Project Evaluation ; Social Discount Rate

References

Arrow, K. J., W. R. Cline, K.-G Mailer, M. Munasinghe, R. Squitieri, and J. E. Stiglitz. 1996. "Intertemporal Equity, Discounting, and Economic Efficiency," in Climate Change 1995: Economic and Social Dimensions – Contribution of Working Group III to the Second Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, J. P. Bruce, H. Lee, & E. F. Haites, eds., 125-144. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Arrow, Kenneth J. , Maureen L. Cropper, Christian Gollier, Ben Groom, Geoffrey M. Heal, Richard G. Newell, William D. Nordhaus, Robert S. Pindyck, William A. Pizer, Paul R. Portney, Thomas Sterner, Richard S. J. Tol, and Martin L. Weitzman. 2014. “Should Governments Use a Declining Discount Rate in Project Analysis?” Review of Environmental Economics and Policy, volume 8, issue 2, Summer 2014, pp. 145–163.

Becker, Gary S., Kevin M. Murphy, and Robert H. Topel. 2010. “On the Economics of Climate Policy,” The B.E. Journal of Economic Analysis & Policy: Vol. 10: Iss. 2 (Symposium), Article 19.

Gollier, Christian. 2003. “Maximizing the Expected Net Future Value as an Alternative Strategy to Gamma Discounting.” IDEI Working Papers, number 213. Toulouse: Institut d'Économie Industrielle (IDEI).

Gollier, Christian. 2009. “Expected Net Present Value, Expected Net Future Value, and the Ramsey Rule.” CESifo Working Paper No. 2643, May 2009.

Gollier, Christian and Martin L. Weitzman. 2009. “How Should the Distant Future be Discounted When Discount Rates are Uncertain?” Economic Letters 107: 350-353.

Newell, Richard, and William Pizer. 2001. “Discounting the distant future: How much do uncertain rates increase valuations?” Resources for the Future, Discussion Paper 00-45. Washington, DC, revised May 14, 2001.

Samuelson, Paul A. and William D. Nordhaus. (1992) Economics, 14th Edition, New York: McGraw-Hill, Inc.

Szekeres, Szabolcs. 2011. “Discounting in Cost-Benefit Analysis.” Society and Economy 33 2, pp. 361–385. DOI: 10.1556/SocEc.33.2011.2.7.

Szekeres, Szabolcs. 2015. “When Should the Distant Future not be Discounted at Increasing Discount Rates?” Manuscript. https://www.dropbox.com/sh/chdkzuhpzklrswc/AAD9fYxQ59NpXB23xC15PJU2a?dl=0

Weitzman, Martin L. 1998. “Why the far distant future should be discounted at its lowest possible rate.” Journal of Environmental Management, Volume 36: 201-208.

Weitzman, Martin L. 2001. “Gamma discounting.” American Economic Review, 91:260-71.

Weitzman, Martin L. 2007. “Subjective expectations and asset return puzzles.” American Economic Review 97:1102–30