De Koning, Kees (2015): Wealth, incomes and debt: the blocked channels.
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_63516.pdf Download (162kB) | Preview |
Abstract
Economic growth data does not show how such growth was achieved. Was it based on income growth and consumption spending levels or was it based on borrowings to extend the income levels? The question is vital for deciding which economic tools work best for correcting imbalances. The main imbalances are based on the developments of two key variables: the level of income growth and the level of debt incurred to buy homes, consumer goods and education. The U.S. Balance Sheet of Households and Nonprofit Organizations sums up, very succinctly, the wealth position of households through various asset and liability classes. What a single balance sheet cannot show is how assets, liabilities, incomes and net worth interact. Making use of historical balance sheets provide a better insight. For instance in 1997, the combined liabilities of home mortgages and consumer credits as a percentage of disposable personal income stood at 82.9%. By the end of 2006 this percentage had increased to 123.7%. Per end of 2010 this percentage had dropped to 111.6%, only to drop even further to 96.4% per end of 2014. Student loans have not been included in these figures. If debts grow faster than income levels, one may define such a period as one of overfunding and, when debts grow slower than incomes, underfunding occurs. Overfunding took place in the U.S. from 1998-2007 and underfunding from 2008-2014. Relative positions are important, but the absolute level of incomes growth is essential. During the overfunding period average income levels had a tendency to grow slightly faster than the CPI level, while during the underfunding period average income growth lagged behind the CPI inflation levels. Finally, the spread of income levels around the average is important. Do the lower income groups benefit less from economic growth than the better off? This paper aims to set out why some new economic tools are needed to correct imbalances. They are: (i) the Economic Growth Incentive method (EGIM); (ii) the use of some pension fund savings and (iii) the use of home equity, which is the most illiquid of all savings. All three tools are for temporary use only. In the U.S. at 2014 year-end, pension entitlements stood at $20.8 trillion while owners’ equity in household real estate was valued at $11.25 trillion. In the U.S. such locked up equity positions have not been used as an economic policy tool to speed up or slow down the conversion process from equity to income when economic circumstances require such actions. Neither have future government cash flows been used as an economic policy tool.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | Wealth, incomes and debt: the blocked channels |
English Title: | Wealth, incomes and debt: the blocked channels |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | business cycle, overfunding and underfunding, economic growth, debt-to-income levels and debt-to-asset values, pension savings, home equity, Economic Growth incentive method, Quantitative Easing, Keynesian cash injections, interest rates, money supply and money supplied. |
Subjects: | E - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics > E2 - Consumption, Saving, Production, Investment, Labor Markets, and Informal Economy E - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics > E2 - Consumption, Saving, Production, Investment, Labor Markets, and Informal Economy > E21 - Consumption ; Saving ; Wealth E - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics > E3 - Prices, Business Fluctuations, and Cycles > E32 - Business Fluctuations ; Cycles E - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics > E5 - Monetary Policy, Central Banking, and the Supply of Money and Credit E - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics > E5 - Monetary Policy, Central Banking, and the Supply of Money and Credit > E58 - Central Banks and Their Policies E - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics > E6 - Macroeconomic Policy, Macroeconomic Aspects of Public Finance, and General Outlook E - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics > E6 - Macroeconomic Policy, Macroeconomic Aspects of Public Finance, and General Outlook > E62 - Fiscal Policy |
Item ID: | 63516 |
Depositing User: | Drs Kees DE KONING |
Date Deposited: | 11 Apr 2015 10:03 |
Last Modified: | 28 Sep 2019 04:43 |
References: | Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis, B100 and B101 Balance Sheet of Households and Non-profit Organizations, http://www.federalreserve.gov/releases/Z1/current/accessible/b100.htm http://www.federalreserve.gov/releases/z1/current/z1r-5.pdf; Kees De Koning: Overfunding and underfunding, a main cause of the business cycle? 5th March 2015, MPRA; http://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/62571/ Executive Office of the President of the United States, Washington D.C. Office of Management and Budget, Table 2.1 Federal Receipts by source 1934-2016, U.S. Census Bureau, Washington D.C. Jeffrey L. Barnet and others, 2012 Census of Government: State and Local Government Summary Report December 17, 2014, http://www2.census.gov/govs/local/summary_report.pdf Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, Washington D.C., Quarterly Report of the Federal Reserve Balance Sheet Developments March 2015, www.federalreserve.gov/files/quarterly_balance_sheet_developments_report_201503.pdf |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/63516 |