Köppl Turyna, Monika (2014): Two-candidate competition with endogenous valence: a differential game approach.
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_64203.pdf Download (276kB) | Preview |
Abstract
We propose a differential game approach to analyze two--candidate competition in a la Hotelling game with candidates simultaneously choosing locations and investment in valence. We find a Markov perfect equilibrium in which candidates choose divergent locations. Divergence from the median is increasing if the parameter measuring the importance of policy relative to valence is decreasing and if valence depreciates slowly. The results are generalizable to a version of the game with probabilistic voting, that is with a stochastic state equation.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | Two-candidate competition with endogenous valence: a differential game approach |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | differential game, two--candidate competition, valence |
Subjects: | D - Microeconomics > D7 - Analysis of Collective Decision-Making > D72 - Political Processes: Rent-Seeking, Lobbying, Elections, Legislatures, and Voting Behavior D - Microeconomics > D7 - Analysis of Collective Decision-Making > D78 - Positive Analysis of Policy Formulation and Implementation |
Item ID: | 64203 |
Depositing User: | Dr. Monika Köppl Turyna |
Date Deposited: | 11 May 2015 13:38 |
Last Modified: | 27 Sep 2019 13:39 |
References: | Ansolabehere, S., Snyder, J., 2000. Valence Politics and Equilibrium in Spatial Election Models. Public Choice 103, 327{336. Ashworth, S., Bueno de Mesquita, E., 2009. Elections with platform and valence competition. Games and Economic Behavior 67, 191{216. Banks, J., Duggan, J., 2005. Social Choice and Strategic Decisions: Essays in Honor of Je�rey S. Banks. Berlin: Springer, Ch. Probabilistic Voting in the Spatial Model of Elections: The Theory of O�ffice Motivated Candidates, pp. 15{56. Caputo, M. R., 2005. Foundations of Dynamic Economic Analysis: Optimal Control Theory and Applications. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Davis, M. L., Porter, P., 1989. A test for pure or apparent ideology in congressional voting. Public Choice 60, 101{111. Dockner, E., J�rgensen, S., Long, N. V., Sorger, G., 2000. Di�erential games in economics and management science. New York: Cambridge University Press. Downs, A., 1957. An Economic Theory of Democracy. New York: Harper. Fershtman, C., Muller, E., 1984. Capital accumulation games of in�nite duration. Journal of Economic Theory 33, 322{339. Herrera, H., Levine, D. K., Martinelli, C., 2008. Policy platforms, campaign spending and voter participation. Journal of Public Economics 92 (34), 501 { 513. URL http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0047272707001788 Hotelling, H., 1929. Stability in competition. Economic Journal 39, 41{57. K�oppl-Turyna, M., 2014. Campaign fi�nance regulations and policy convergence: The role of interest groups and valence. European Journal of Political Economy 33, 1{19. McCarty, N., Poole, K. T., Rosenthal, H., 2006. Polarized America: The Dance of Ideology and Unequal Riches. The MIT Press, Cambridge MA. Mueller, D. C., Stratmann, T., 1994. Informative and persuasive campaigning. Public Choice 81, 55{77. Schofi�eld, N., 2006. Equilibria in the spatial stochastic model of voting with party activists. Review of Economic Design 10, 183{203. Scho�eld, N., 2007. The mean voter theorem: Necessary and su�cient conditions for convergent equilibrium. Review of Economic Studies 74, 965{980. Scho�eld, N., Claassen, C., Ozdemir, U., Tavits, M., March 2010a. Modeling elections in the United States and Poland: Voter perceptions, political leaders and activists., unpublished paper. Department of Political Science, Washington University, St. Louis. Schofi�eld, N., Gallego, M., Ozdemir, U., July 2010b. Modeling elections in the Netherlands and Canada., unpublished paper. Department of Political Science, Washington University, St. Louis. Schofi�eld, N., Jeon, J., August 2010. "Leadership" in the elections in Great Britain 2005 and 2010., unpublished paper. Department of Political Science, Washington University, St. Louis. Scho�field, N., Zakharov, A., 2010. A Stochastic Model of the 2007 Russian Duma Election. Public Choice 142(1-2), 177{194. Serra, G., 2010. Polarization of what? A model of elections with endogenous valence. The Journal of Politics 72, 426{437. Turyna, M., 2010. Spatial analysis of the Polish parliament 2007-2010. Politics in Central Europe 6, 40{77. |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/64203 |