Income Inequality and Risk Taking

Schmidt, Ulrich and Neyse, Levent and Aleknonyte, Milda (2015): Income Inequality and Risk Taking.

Abstract

Standard economic theory assumes that individual risk taking decisions are independent from the social context. Recent experimental evidence however shows that the income of peers has a systematic impact on observed degrees of risk aversion. In particular, subjects strive for balance in the sense that they take higher risks if this gives them the chance to break even with their peers. The present paper is, to the best of our knowledge, the first systematic analysis of income inequality and risk taking. We perform a real-effort field experiment where inequality is introduced to different wage rates. After the effort phase subjects can invest (part of) their salary into a risky asset. Besides the above mentioned possibility of higher risk taking of low-wage individuals to break even with high-wage individuals, risk taking can be influenced by an income effect consistent with e.g. decreasing absolute risk aversion and a house money effect of high-wage individuals. Our results show that the dominant impact of inequality on risk taking is what can be termed a social house money effect: high-wage individuals take higher risks than low-wage individuals only if they are aware of the inequality in wages.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: Risk; Inequality; Real Effort; Field Experiment; Social Comparison
• Subjects: C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C9 - Design of Experiments > C91 - Laboratory, Individual Behavior; C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C9 - Design of Experiments > C93 - Field Experiments; D - Microeconomics > D6 - Welfare Economics > D63 - Equity, Justice, Inequality, and Other Normative Criteria and Measurement; D - Microeconomics > D8 - Information, Knowledge, and Uncertainty > D81 - Criteria for Decision-Making under Risk and Uncertainty; J - Labor and Demographic Economics > J3 - Wages, Compensation, and Labor Costs > J31 - Wage Level and Structure ; Wage Differentials

References

Brock, J.M., Lange, A., & Ozbay, E.Y. 2013. "Dictating the risk: experimental evidence on giving in risky environments." American Economic Review, 103(1): 415-37.

Fehr, E. & Schmidt, K. M. 1999. "A theory of fairness, competition, and cooperation". Quarterly journal of Economics, 114: 817-868.

Friedl, A., De Miranda, K. L., & Schmidt, U. 2014. "Insurance demand and social comparison: An experimental analysis". Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 48(2): 97-109.

Gill, D. & Prowse, V. 2012. "A structural analysis of disappointment aversion in a real effort competition". American Economic Review, 102(1): 469-503.

Gneezy, U., Niederle, M., & Rustichini, A. 2003. "Performance in competitive environments: Gender differences". Quarterly Journal of Economics, 118(3): 1049-1074.

Hill, S. E. & Buss, D. M. 2010. "Risk and relative social rank: positional concerns and risky shifts in probabilistic decision-making." Evolution and Human Behavior 31: 219-226.

Jelschen, H. & Schmidt, U. 2015. The house money effect in a dynamic setting. Working paper.

Kahneman, D. & Tversky, A. 1979. "Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk." Econometrica 47: 263-291.

Konow, J. 2000. "Fair shares: Accountability and cognitive dissonance in allocation decisions". American Economic Review, 90: 1072-1091.

Kőszegi, B. & Rabin, M. 2006. "A model of reference-dependent preferences." Quarterly Journal of Economics 121: 1133-1165.

Kőszegi, B. & Rabin, M. 2007. "Reference-dependent risk attitudes." The American Economic Review 97: 1047-1073.

Lahno, A. M. & Serra-Garcia, M. 2012. "Peer effects in risk taking." CESifo Working Paper No. 4057.

Linde, J. & Sonnemans, J. 2012. "Social comparison and risky choices." Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 44: 45-72.

Perotti, R. 1993. “Political equilibrium, income distribution, and growth.” Review of Economic Studies, 60: 755–776.

Rohde, I. & Rohde, K. 2011. "Risk attitudes in a social context." Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 43: 205-225.

Schmidt, U., Friedl, A., & Lima de Miranda, K. 2015. „Gender difference in risk taking: An evolutionary perspective. Working paper.

Schwerter, F. 2013. "Social reference points and risk taking." Bonn Econ. Discussion Papers No. 11 Sutter, M. &

Weck-Hannemann, H. (2003). "Taxation and the veil of ignorance – A real effort experiment on the Laffer curve". Public Choice, 115: 217-240.

Thaler, R. H. & Johnson, E. J. 1990. "Gambling with the house money and trying to break even: The effects of prior outcomes on risky choice". Management Science, 36(6): 643-660.

Tversky, A. & Kahneman, D. 1992. "Advances in prospect theory: Cumulative representation of uncertainty." Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 5: 297-323.

Veblen, T. (1965). The Theory of the Leisure Class. 1899. New York: McMillan.

Vendrik, M. & Woltjer, G. B. 2007. "Happiness and loss aversion: Is utility concave or convex in relative income?" Journal of Public Economics, 91: 1423-1448.

Vieider, F.M., Lefebvre, M., Bouchouicha, R., Chmura, T., Hakimov, R., Krawczyk, M., & Martinsson, P. (2015). "Common components of risk and uncertainty attitudes across contexts and domains: Evidence from 30 countries". Journal of the European Economic Association, forthcoming.