Pongou, Roland and Tchantcho, Bertrand and Tedjeugang, Narcisse (2015): Trial-Based Tournament: Rank and Earnings.
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_65582.pdf Download (186kB) | Preview |
Abstract
Trial-based tournament is a widespread hiring mechanism in organizations. Upon a job opening, an applicant is tried out at the job, then swaps with another competing applicant, and so on, with each non-competing worker holding the same position across trials. The job is offered to the applicant whose trial has had the most positive effect on the organization's output. We formalize this tournament model, deriving measures of relative performance that can be used to rank workers for each job and assess their comparative advantage when absolute performance cannot be observed. As a second goal, we study the relationship between tournament rank and earnings as determined by marginal productivity. We show that pay is a weakly increasing function of tournament rank, and we characterize organizations for which pay strictly reflects tournament rank and vice-versa. These organizations are linear and top-down biased, and they strictly include the popular class of von Neumann-Morgenstern organizations. The analysis implies that hierarchical organizations that promote fairness in pay should not have too many layers.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | Trial-Based Tournament: Rank and Earnings |
English Title: | Trial-Based Tournament: Rank and Earnings |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | Hierarchical organizations, trial-based tournament, tournament rank, marginal productivity, top-down biased organizations. |
Subjects: | C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C7 - Game Theory and Bargaining Theory D - Microeconomics > D0 - General > D03 - Behavioral Microeconomics: Underlying Principles L - Industrial Organization > L2 - Firm Objectives, Organization, and Behavior M - Business Administration and Business Economics ; Marketing ; Accounting ; Personnel Economics > M5 - Personnel Economics |
Item ID: | 65582 |
Depositing User: | Dr. Roland Pongou |
Date Deposited: | 14 Jul 2015 06:50 |
Last Modified: | 28 Sep 2019 23:53 |
References: | Aumann, R.J., and Shapley, L.S. (1974): Values of non-atomic games, Princeton University Press, Princeton. Baker, G.P., Gibbs, M., and Holmstrom, B. (1994): "The wage policy of a firm," Quarterly Journal of Economics 109(4), 921-955. DeVaro, J. (2006): "Internal promotion competitions in firms," RAND Journal of Economics 37(3), 521-542. Diffo Lambo, L. and Moulen, J. (2002): "Ordinal equivalence of power notions in voting games," Theory and Decision 53, 313-325. Doeringer, P., and Piore, M. (1971): Internal labor market and manpower analysis. Lexington, MA: D.C. Heath. Dye, R.A. (1984): "The Trouble with Tournaments," Economic Inquiry 22(1), 147-150. Ehrenberg, R.G., and Bognanno, M.L. (1990): "Do tournaments have incentive effects?," The Journal of Political Economy 98(6), 1307-1324. Freixas, J. (2005a): "The Shapley-Shubik power index for games with several levels of approval in the input and output," Dec. Support System 39, 185-195. Freixas, J. (2005b): "Banzhaf measures for games with several levels of approval in the input and output," Annals of Operations Research 137, 45-66. Gabaix, X., and Landier, A. (2008): "Why has CEO pay increased so much?" Quarterly Journal of Economics 123(1), 49-100. Gibbons, R., and Waldman, M. (2006): "Task-specific human capital," American Economic Review 94(2), 203-207. Green, J.R., and Stokey, N.L. (1983): "A comparison of tournaments and contracts," Journal of Political Economy 91(3), 349- 364. Holler, M.J., and Owen, G. (2001): Power indices and coalition formation. Kluwer Academic Publishers. Isbell, J.R. (1958): "A class of simple games," Duke Math. J. 25, 423-439. Laruelle, A. and Valenciano, F. (2001): "Shapley-Shubik and Banzhaf indices revisited," Mathematics of Operations Research 26, 89 - 104. Lazear, E.P. (1995): Personnel economics. Cambridge, MA and London Lazear, E.P., Rosen, S. (1981): "Rank-order tournaments as optimum labor contracts," Journal of Political Economy 89, 841-864. Leech, D. (2003): "Computing power indices for large voting games," Management Science 49(6), 831-837. Mincer, J. (1974): Schooling, experience, and earnings. New York: Columbia University Press for NBER. Pongou, R., Tchantcho, B., and Tedjeugang, N. (2015): "A ladder tournament," Mimeo. Reder, M.W. (1955): "Theory of occupational wage differentials," American Economic Review 45, 833-852. Roth, A. (1988): The Shapley value: Essays in honor of Lloyd S. Shapley. Cambridge University Press. Sen A.K. (1973): On Economic Inequality, Oxford: Clarendon Press. Serrano, R. (2013): "Lloyd Shapley's matching and game theory," Scandinavian Journal of Economics 115, 599-618. Shapley, L.S. (1953): "A Value for n-person Games," in Contributions to the Theory of Games, volume II, by H.W. Kuhn and A.W. Tucker, editors. Annals of Mathematical Studies v. 28, pp. 307--317. Princeton University Press, 1953. Shapley, L.S, and Shubik, M. (1954): "A model for evaluating the distribution of power in a commitee system," Amer. Polit. Sci. Rev. 48, 787-792. Shapley, L.S, and Shubik, M. (1967): "Ownership and the production function," Quarterly Journal of Economics 81(1), 88-111. Taylor, A.D, Zwicker, W.S., 1999. Simple games: desirability relations, trading and pseudoweightings. New Jersey, USA: Princeton University Press. von Neumann, J., and Morgenstern, O. 1944. Theory of games and economic behaviour. Princeton University Press, Princeton. |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/65582 |