Dwibedi, Jayanta Kumar and Marjit, Sugata (2015): Relative Affluence and Child Labor - Explaining a Paradox.
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_66379.pdf Download (220kB) | Preview |
Abstract
Some micro level empirical studies questioned the validity of the poverty hypothesis of child labour. In some cases child labour incidence found to be increasing even with improvement in the economic conditions of the poor. This paper provides a possible explanation as to why increase in absolute income may not be sufficient to solve the problem of child labour, at least in some cases. We argue that people in general are not just concerned about their own consumption; they are very much affected by the consumption of their peers. While taking decisions regarding the time allocation of their children between work and leisure, parents do keep an eye on their relative position in the society. We may have a situation where the absolute income of the poor is increasing but their relative position is the society is deteriorating and this may lead to an increase in child work. We develop a theoretical model of household decision making to show that child labour supply from a poor family can increase even with improvements in its economic conditions if the family’s relative position in the society deteriorates and if the relative concern effect is sufficiently strong.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | Relative Affluence and Child Labor - Explaining a Paradox |
English Title: | Relative Affluence and Child Labor - Explaining a Paradox |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | Child labour, Relative concern, Status effect, Inequality |
Subjects: | D - Microeconomics > D1 - Household Behavior and Family Economics > D11 - Consumer Economics: Theory I - Health, Education, and Welfare > I3 - Welfare, Well-Being, and Poverty > I31 - General Welfare, Well-Being J - Labor and Demographic Economics > J1 - Demographic Economics > J10 - General J - Labor and Demographic Economics > J1 - Demographic Economics > J13 - Fertility ; Family Planning ; Child Care ; Children ; Youth |
Item ID: | 66379 |
Depositing User: | Dr. Jayanta Kumar Dwibedi |
Date Deposited: | 01 Sep 2015 06:32 |
Last Modified: | 03 Oct 2019 01:19 |
References: | Akerlof, G.(1997). Social distance and social decisions. Econometrica, Vol. 65, 1005–1027. Barros, R., Mendonca, R. and T.Velazco (1994). Is poverty the main cause of child work in urban Brazil?,Texto Para Discussao No 351, Servico Editorial. Basu, K. and P.H. Van (1998).The economics of child labour, American Economic Review, vol. 88(3), 412-427. Basu, K., Das, S. and B. Dutta (2010). Child labor and household wealth: Theory and empirical evidence of an inverted-U, Journal of Development Economics, Vol. 91(1), 8–14. Bhalotra, S. and C. Heady (2003). Child farm labor: The Wealth Paradox, World Bank Econ Review, Vol. 17 (2), 197-227. Bonnet, M. (1993). Child Labour in Africa, International Labour Review, Vol. 132, 371-389. Canagarajah, S. and H. Coulombe (1997). Child labor and schooling in Ghana, Policy Research Working Paper No. 1844, World Bank, Washington, D.C. Bowles S. and Y. Park (2005). Emulation, inequality, and work hours: Was Thorsten Veblen right?, The Economic Journal, Vol. 115(507). Cartwright, K.(1999) “Child Labor in Colombia,” in The Policy Analysis of Child Labor, A Comparative Study,” edited by Christiaan Grootaert and Harry Anthony Patrinos, Washington, D.C.: World Bank. Cartwright, K. and A. Patrions (1999). Child labor in urban Bolivia, in The Policy Analysis of Child Labor, A Comparative Study,” edited by Christiaan Grootaert and Harry Anthony Patrinos, Washington, D.C.: World Bank. Chaudhuri, S. and J.K. Dwibedi (2007). Foreign capital inflow, fiscal policies and incidence of child labour in a developing economy, The Manchester School, Vol. 75(1), 17-46. Duesenberry, J.S., (1949). Income, Saving and the Theory of Consumer Behavior. Cambridge, MA. Duryea, S. and M.P. Arends-Kuenning (2003).School attendance, child labor, and local labor markets in urban Brazil, World Development, Vol. 31, 1165–78. Easterlin, R.A.(1974). Does economic growth improve the human lot? Some empirical evidence, in: David, P. A,Reder, M. W. (Eds.). Nations and Households in Economic Growth: Essays in Honor of Moses Abramowitz.New York and London: Academic Press, 89-125. Easterlin, R.A. (1995). Will raising the incomes of all increase the happiness of all? ,Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, Vol. 27, 35-47. Edmonds, E. (2005). Does child labor decline with improving economic status?, Journal of Human Resources, Vol. 40(1), 77-99. Edmonds, E. and C. Turk(2002). Child labor in transition in Vietnam, World Bank Policy Research paper #2774. Fafchamps, M., and F. Shilpi (2008). Subjective welfare, isolation, and relative consumption, Journal of Development Economics, Vol. 86(1), 43-60. Frank, R. H. (1985). The demand for unobservable and other non positional goods, American Economic Review, Vol. 75(1), 101-116. Galbraith J. K. (1958). The Affluent Society, Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 1958. Grootaert, C. and H. Patrinos (2002). A four-country comparative study of child labor, mimeo: The World Bank. Grootaert, C. (1999). Child labour in Cote d’Ivoire: incidence and determinants, in The Policy Analysis of Child Labour: A Comparative Study. C. Grootaert and H. Patrinos (eds.), manuscript, World Bank, Washington. Jensen, P. and H.S. Nielsen (1997). Child labour or school attendance? Evidence from Zambia, Journal of Population Economics, Vol. 10, 407-424. Krueger, A. (1996). International labor standards and trade, in Michael Bruno and Boris Pleskovic (eds.) Annual World Bank Conference on Development Economics, (Washington, D.C.: The World Bank), 281-302. Kruger, D. I. (2007). Coffee production effects on child labor and schooling in rural Brazil, Journal of Development Economics, Vol. 82(2), 448–463. Leibenstein H. (1950). Bandwagon, Snob, and Veblen Effects in the Theory of Consumers' Demand, The Quarterly Journal of Economics, Vol. 64(2), 183-207. Marjit, S., Santra, S. and K. K. Hati (2015). Relative social status and conflicting measures of poverty: A behavioral analytical model, Journal of Quantitative Economics, Vol. 13(1). Marjit, S. and Lei Yang(2015). Accumulation with malnutrition - The role of status seeking behavior, University of Queensland, School of Economics discussion papers series 544. Nagaraj, K. (2002). Female and child workers in a household industry: A case study of beedi industry in Karnataka and Tamil Nadu, mimeo: Madras Institute of Development. Nandi, T. K. (2015). The effect of employment guarantee scheme on school attendance in rural India, CTRPFP Working Paper No. 7. CSSS, Calcutta. Patrinos, H. and G. Psacharopoulos (1997). Family size, schooling and child labor in Peru: An empirical analysis, Journal of Population Economics, Vol. 10, 387-405. Lokshin, M and M. Ravallion ( 2005). Rich and powerful? Subjective power and welfare, Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, Vol. 56(2), 141-172. Ray, R. (2000a). Analysis of child labour in Peru and Pakistan: A comparative study, Journal of Population Economics, Vol.13, 3-19. Ray, R. (2000b). Child labour, child schooling and their interaction with adult labour: Empirical evidence from Peru and Pakistan, The World Bank Economic Review, Vol. 14(2), 347-367. Sasaki, M.and T. Temesgen (1999). Children in different activities: Child labor and schooling in Peru, Draft, World Bank, Washington, D.C. Sivanathan N. and N. C.Pettit (2010).Protecting the self through consumption: Status goods as affirmational commodities, Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, Vol. 46(3), 564–570 Swaminathan, M. (1998). Economic growth and the persistence of child labor: Evidence from an Indian city, World Development, Vol. 26(8), 1513-1528. Veblen, T. (1899).The Theory of the Leisure Class: An Economic Study of Institutions, New York: Macmillan. Wahba, J.(2000). Do Market Wages influence Child Labor and Child Schooling?, Social Protection Discussion Paper Series, No. 0024, Human Development Network, The World Bank. |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/66379 |