The (dis-)embedded firm: Complex structure and dynamics in inter-firm relations. Adding institutionalization as a Veblenian dimension to the Coase-Williamson approach – An emerging triangular organizational space

Elsner, Wolfram and Schwardt, Henning (2015): The (dis-)embedded firm: Complex structure and dynamics in inter-firm relations. Adding institutionalization as a Veblenian dimension to the Coase-Williamson approach – An emerging triangular organizational space.

Abstract

The increasing complexity of the environment of firms, of strategic interaction, and emergent informal institutional network cooperation, seems to outreach the traditional Coase-Williamson transaction-cost framework with its market-hierarchy dichotomy. We propose to take the complexity of nowadays’ firm ecologies more serious and integrate an institutional dimension to enhance the analysis of real-world organizational forms and the theory of the firm. This institutional dimension is conceptualized as an “OIE” (Veblenian) “institutional dichotomy” that ranges between “instrumental” cooperative networking and “ceremonial encapsulation” (lock-in). Thus, a more comprehensive two-dimensional, particularly triangular, organizational space is drafted, which can better map the numerous and diverse forms of production and innovation systems, including their emergence as spatial clusters and corporate networks. The additional dimension integrates institutionalized network cooperation as “instrumental problem-solving”, vs. power and status seeking (by both large hierarchies and fiercely rivalling market participants) as “ceremonial dominance”. In addition to ideal market and hierarchy, it provides the ideal solution of institutionalized network cooperation, learned in recurrent social-dilemma problems, as a third vanishing point and corner. The resulting Organizational Triangle is considered a heuristic for inter-firm organizational research. As a check of its usefulness, this device is applied to recent developments in the global corporate economy.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: Theory of the firm; direct interdependence/strategic interaction; institutional emergence/institutionalized cooperation; Coase/Williamson; embeddedness; Veblenian institutional dichotomy; instrumental/ceremonial institutional aspects; spatial clusters/firm networks; open innovation; organizational triangle
• Subjects: B - History of Economic Thought, Methodology, and Heterodox Approaches > B5 - Current Heterodox Approaches > B52 - Institutional ; Evolutionary; D - Microeconomics > D0 - General > D02 - Institutions: Design, Formation, Operations, and Impact; D - Microeconomics > D2 - Production and Organizations > D23 - Organizational Behavior ; Transaction Costs ; Property Rights; D - Microeconomics > D8 - Information, Knowledge, and Uncertainty > D85 - Network Formation and Analysis: Theory; L - Industrial Organization > L1 - Market Structure, Firm Strategy, and Market Performance > L14 - Transactional Relationships ; Contracts and Reputation ; Networks

References

Amin, Ash, and Jerzy Hauzner (eds.) (1997), Beyond Market and Hierarchy: Interactive Governance and Social Complexity, Guildford and King’s Lynn: Biddles.

Aoki, Masahiko (2010), Corporations in Evolving Diversity: Cognition, Governance, and Institutions, Oxford (UK): Oxford University Press.

Armstrong, Peter (2001), “Science, Enterprise and Profit: Ideology in the Knowledge-driven Economy”, Economy and Society, 30(4), 524-552.

Axelrod, Robert ([1984] 2006), The Evolution of Cooperation, New York: Basic Books.

Baudry, Bernard, and David Gindis (2005), “The V-Network Form: Economic Organization and the Theory of the Firm”, Mimeo. University of Lyon 2, LEFI. https://emnet.univie.ac.at/fileadmin/user_upload/conf_EMNet/2005/papers/BaudryGindis.pdf.

Beinhocker, Eric D. (2008), The Origin of Wealth – Evolution, Complexity, and the Radical Remaking of Economics. London: Random House.

Berle, Adolf A. (1967), “Property, Production and Revolution – A Preface to the Revised Edition”, in: A.A. Berle, G.C. Means, The Modern Corporation and Private Property (rev. ed.), New York: Harcourt, Brace and World, vii-xxvii.

Bloch, Harry, and Stanley Metcalfe (2013), “Complexity in the theory of the developing firm”, in: C. Antonelli (ed.), Handbook on the Economic Complexity of Technological Change, Cheltenham, UK, Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar, 81-104.

Burt, Ronald S. (2000), “The Network Structure of Social Capital”, Research in Organizational Behavior, 22, 345-423.

Bush, Paul D. (1987), “The Theory of Institutional Change”, Journal of Economic Issues, 21(3), 1075-1116.

Bush, Paul D. (1999), Art. “Recognized interdependence”, in: Encyclopedia of Political Economy, ed. by P.A. O’Hara, London, New York: Routledge, Vol. 2, 963-964.

Castro, Julio O. de, Susanna Khavul, and Garry Bruton (2014), “Shades of grey: How do informal firms navigate between macro and meso institutional environments?”, Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 8, 75-94.

Choi, T.Y., and Yunsook Hong (2002), “Unveiling the Structure of Supply Networks: Case Studies in Honda, Acura, and DaimlerChrysler”, Journal of Operations Management, 20(5), 469-493.

Coase, Ronald H. (1937), “The Nature of the Firm”, Economica, 4, 386-405.

Coase, Ronald H. (1992), “The Institutional Structure of Production”, American Economic Review, 82(4), 713-719.

Commons, John R. (1934), Institutional Economics. Its Place in Political Economy. New York: Macmillan (repr. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers, 1990).

Cyert, Richard M., and James G. March (1992 [1963]), A Behavioral Theory of the Firm, Malden, MA, USA, Oxford, UK: Blackwell (repr. 2003).

David, Paul A. (1985), “Clio and the economics of QWERTY”, American Economic Review, 75.2, 332-337.

Dietrich, Michael, and Jackie Krafft (2008), „Towards a Historically Relevant Economics of the Firm”, in: W. Elsner, H. Hanappi (eds.), Varieties of Capitalism and New Institutional Deals – Regulation, Welfare, and the New Economy, Cheltenham UK, and Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar, 103-121.

Dosi, Giovanni, Renato Gianetti, and P.A. Toninelli (eds.) (1993), Technology and Enterprise in a Historical Perspective, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Dosi, Giovanni, and Roberta Salvatore (1992), “The Structure of Industrial Production and the Boundaries between Organization and Markets”, in: A.J. Scott and M. Stolper (eds.) Pathways to Regional Development, Boulder, CO: Westview, 1-26.

Elsner, Wolfram (2005), „Real-World Economics Today: The New Complexity, Co-ordination, and Policy”, Review of Social Economy, LXIII.1, 19-53.

Elsner, Wolfram (2010), “The Process and the Simple Logic of ‘Meso’: Emergence and the Co-Evolution of Institutions and Group Size”, Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 20 (3), 445-477.

Elsner, Wolfram (2012), “The Theory of Institutional Change Revisited: The Institutional Dichotomy, its Dynamic, and its Policy Implications in a More Formal Analysis”, Journal of Economic Issues, 46 (1), 1-44.

Elsner, Wolfram (2015), “Policy Implications of Economic Complexity and Complexity Economics”; https://ideas.repec.org/p/pra/mprapa/63252.html.

Elsner, Wolfram, and Torsten Heinrich (2009), „A simple theory of ‘meso’. On the co-evolution of institutions and platform size – with an application to varieties of capitalism and ‘medium-sized’ countries“, Journal of Socio-Economics, 38, 843-858.

Elsner, Wolfram, Gero Hocker, and Henning Schwardt (2010), “Simplistic vs. Complex Organization: Markets, Hierarchies and Networks in an Organizational Triangle – A Simple Heuristic to Analyze Real-World Economic Forms”, Journal of Economic Issues, 44 (1), 1-30.

Elsner, Wolfram, and Henning Schwardt (2014), “Trust and Arena Size: Expectations, Institutions, and General Trust, and Critical Population and Group Sizes”, Journal of Institutional Economics, 10 (1), 107-134.

Foley, Duncan K. (1998), “Introduction”, in: id. and Albin, P.S., Barriers and Bounds to Rationality. Essays on Economic Complexity and Dynamics in Interactive Systems, ed. and with an Introduction by D.K. Foley, Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Pr., 3-72.

Foss, Kirsten (2001), “Organizing Technological Interdependencies: A Coordination Perspective on the Firm”, Industrial and Corporate Change, 10(1), 151-178.

Foss, Nicolai J. (1993), “Theories of the Firm: Contractual and Competence Perspectives”, Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 3(2), 127-143.

Galbraith, John K. ([1967] 2007), The New Industrial State, Princeton: Princeton University Press.

Groenewegen, John (1996), “Transaction Cost Economics and Beyond: Why and How?”, in id. (ed.), Transaction Cost Economics and Beyond, Boston, et al.: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

Hayden, F. Gregory, Bolduc, Steven R. (2000), “Contracts and Costs in a Corporate/Government System Dynamics Network: A United States Case”, in: Elsner, W. and J. Groenewegen, (eds.), Industrial Policies After 2000, Boston, London, Dordrecht: Kluwer Acad. Publ., 235-284.

Heinrich, Torsten, and Henning Schwardt (2013), “Institutional Inertia and Institutional Change in an Expanding Normal-Form Game”, games, 4, 398-425.

Helper, Susan, and Mari Sako (2010), “Management Innovation in Supply Chain: Appreciating Chandler in the Twenty-First Century”, Industrial and Corporate Change, 19(2), 399-429.

Hodgson, Geoffrey M. (1993), “Transaction Costs and the Evolution of the Firm”, in: C.N. Pitelis (ed.), Transaction Costs, Markets and Hierarchies, Oxford UK, Cambridge, MA: Blackwell, 77-100.

Hodgson, Geoffrey M. (1996), “Corporate Culture and the Nature of the Firm”, in: J. Groenewegen (ed.), Transaction Cost Economics and Beyond, Boston, et al.: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 249-269.

Hodgson, Geoffrey M. (1998), “Evolutionary and competence-based theories of the firm”, Journal of Economic Studies, 25.1, 25-56.

Hodgson, Geoffrey M. (2004), “Opportunism is Not the Only Reason Why Firms Exist: Why an Explanatory Emphasis on Opportunism May Mislead Management Strategy”, Industrial and Corporate Change, 13(2), 401-418.

Hodgson, Geoffrey M. (2005), “Knowledge at Work: Some Neoliberal Anachronism”, Review of Social Economy, 63(4), 547-565.

Hodgson, Geoffrey M., and Thorbjørn Knudsen (2000), “Capabilities, Learning and the Nature of the Firm: Why Transaction Cost Theory May Provide an Incomplete Explanation”, mimeo, paper presented at the annual conference of the European Association for Evolutionary Political Economy, Berlin; https://ideas.repec.org/a/cai/recosp/reco_582_0331.html.

Kay, Neil (2000), “Searching for the Firm: The Role of Decisions in the Economics of Organizations”, Industrial and Corporate Change, 9(4), 683-707.

Lazonick, William (2010), “Innovative Business Models and Varieties of Capitalism: Financialization of the U.S. Corporation”, Business History Review, 84, 675-702.

Loasby, Brian J. (2001), “Time, Knowledge and Evolutionary Dynamics: Why Connections Matter”, Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 11(4), 393-412.

Lerner, Josh, and Jean Tirole, (2002), “Some simple economics of open source”, Journal of Industrial Economics, 50(2), 197-234.

Malerba, Franco and Luigi Orsenigo (1996), “The Dynamics and Evolution of Industries”, Industrial and Corporate Change, 5(1), 51-88.

Marshall, Alfred, (1920 [1890]), Principles of Economics, London, Basingstoke: Macmillan; 8th ed.

Matutinovic, Igor (2010), “Economic Complexity and the Role of Markets”, Journal of Economic Issues, 44(1), 31-52.

Means, Gardiner C. (1967), “Implications of the Corporate Revolution in Economic Theory”, in A.A. Berle and G.C. Means, The Modern Corporation and Private Property (rev. ed. 1967), New York: Harcourt, Brace and World, xxix-xxxviii.

Ménard, Claude M. (2006), “Hybrid Organization of Production and Distribution”, Revista de Análisis Económico, 21(2), 25-41.

Milberg, William, and Deborah Winkler (2013), Outsourcing Economics – Global Value Chains in Capitalist Development, Cambridge, UK, et al.: Cambridge University Press.

Munkirs, John R. (1985), The Transformation of American Capitalism: From Competitive Market Structures to Centralized Private Sector Planning, Armonk, NY, London: M.E. Sharpe.

Navarro-Meneses, Francisco J. (2015), “Complexity-Based View of the Firm: Evidence, Features and Method”, http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2552459.

Neale, Walter C. (1994), “Institutions”, in: G.M. Hodgson, W.J. Samuels, M.R. Tool (eds.), The Elgar Companion to Evolutionary and Institutional Economics, Vol. I, Aldershot, UK, Brookfield, VT: Edward Elgar, 402-6.

Nelson, Richard R. (2002), “Bringing Institutions into Evolutionary Growth Theory”, Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 12(1-2), 17-28.

Nelson, Richard R., and Sidney G. Winter (1982), An Evolutionary Theory of Change, Cambridge, MA. London, UK: Belknap/Harvard University Press.

Nooteboom, Bart (1992), “Towards a Dynamic Theory of Transactions”, Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 2(4), 281-299.

North, Douglass C. (1990), Institutions, Institutional Change, and Economic Performance, Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

North, Douglass C., and Richard P. Thomas (1973), The Rise of the Western World, A New Economic History, Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

North, Douglass C., and John J. Wallis (1994), “Integrating Institutional Change and Technical Change in Economic History – A Transaction Cost Approach”, Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics, 150(4), 609-624.

Nowak, Martin A. (2006), Evolutionary dynamics: Exploring the equations of life, Cambridge, MA, London: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.

Penrose, Edith (1959), The Theory of the Growth of the Firm, Oxford: Blackwell.

Perraton, Jonathan (2001), „The Global Economy – Myths and Reality“, Cambridge Journal of Economics, 25, 669-684.

Pistor, Katharina (2012), “On the Plasticity of the Corporate Form”, in: Complexity and Institutions: Markets, Norms and Corporations, ed. by M. Aoki, K. Binmore, S. Deakin, H. Gintis, IEA Conference Vol. No. 150-II, Basingstoke (UK), New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 173-188.

Pitelis, Christos (1998), “Transaction Costs and the Historical Evolution of the Capitalist Firm”, Journal of Economic Issues, 32(4), 999-1017.

Pitelis, Christos (2007), “A Note on Cyert and March (1963) and Penrose (1959): A Case for Synergy”, Cambridge Judge Business School Working Paper Series, http://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/23939/.

Pitelis, Christos (2012), “Clusters, Entrepreneurial Ecosystem Co-Creation, and Appropriability: A Conceptual Framework”, Industrial and Corporate Change, 21(6), 1359-1388.

Podolny, Joel M., and Karen L. Page (1998), “Network Forms of Organization”, Annual Review of Sociology, 24, 57-76.

Powell, Walter W. (1990), “Neither Market Nor Hierarchy: Network Forms of Organization”, Research of Organizational Behavior, 12, 295-336.

Raymond, Eric S., (1999), The Cathedral and the Bazaar, Sebastopol, CA: O’Reilly.

Rycroft, Robert W., and Kash, Don E., (1999), The Complexity Challenge. Technological Innovation for the 21st Century, London, New York: Pinter.

Saxenian, Annalee (1994), Regional Advantage. Culture and Competition in Silicon Valley and Route 128, Cambridge, MA, London: Harvard University Press.

Shervani, T.A., Gary Frazier, and Goutam Challagalla (2007), “The Moderating Influence of the Firm Market Power on the Transaction Cost Economics Model: An Empirical Test in a Forward Channel Integration Context”, Strategic Management Journal, 28, 635-652.

Tool, Marc (1985), The Discretionary Economy: A Normative Theory of Political Economy, Boulder, CO: Westview Press.

Tool, Marc (1986), Essays in Social Value Theory, Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharpe.

Veblen, Thorstein B., (1979 [1899]), The Theory of the Leisure Class, New York, Harmondsworth, UK: Penguin Books.

Veblen, Thorstein B., (2011 [1904]), The Theory of Business Enterprise, New York: Charles Scribner's Sons.

Vitali, Stefania, Glattfelder, James B., and Battiston, Stefano (2011), “The Network of Global Corporate Control”, Study at the TU Zurich, PLoS ONE, 6(10); accessed Jan. 23, 2014 from: http://www.plosone.org/article/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0025995.

Watts, Duncan J., and Steven Strogatz (1998), “Collective dynamics of 'small-world' networks,” Nature, 393(6684), 440-442.

Williamson, Oliver E. (1975), Markets and Hierarchies: Analysis and Antitrust Implications – A Study in the Economics of Internal Organization, New York: Free Press.

Williamson, Oliver E. (1985), The Economic Institutions of Capitalism: Firms, Markets, Relational Contracting, New York: Free Press.

Williamson, Oliver E. (1991), “Comparative Economic Organization: The Analysis of Discrete Structural Alternatives”, Administrative Science Quarterly, 36 (2), 269-296.

Winter, Sidney G. (1993), “On Coase, Competence, and the Corporation”, in: O.E Williamson and S.G. Winter (eds.), The Nature of the Firm – Origins, Evolutions, and Development, New York and Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press, 179-195.

Wright, Peter, and Ananda Mukherji (1999), “Inside the Firm: Socioeconomic versus Agency Perspectives on Firm Competitiveness”, Journal of Socio-Economics, 28, 295-307.