Pop, Izabela Luiza (2015): Cartels: a Good or a Bad Strategy? Published in: Economy-Innovation-Communication-University, 7th International Symposium Workshop – A cross cultural model , Vol. 6, No. 9 (June 2015): pp. 29-38.
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_67314.pdf Download (327kB) | Preview |
Abstract
Any organization should seek the efficiency maximization, namely the achievement of an effect/effort ratio as high as possible. In order to apply this economic ground rule, some companies use strategies based on gaining a competitive advantage over competitors. In contrast, other companies choose lighter options to increase profitability. They apply strategies focused on agreements with competitors that aim to maintain prices at a certain level regardless of economic factors governing the market mechanism. The purpose of this paper is to highlight the positive and negative effects of cartels as a management strategy. In this regard, the first part of the article summarizes the most important theories about cartels and their characteristics, while the second part presents some European and Romanian cartels, based on data provided by the European Commission and the Competition Council. The final part presents the most important findings and conclusions but also some recommendations for future research.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | Cartels: a Good or a Bad Strategy? |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | cartels, competition, strategies, development, price |
Subjects: | L - Industrial Organization > L1 - Market Structure, Firm Strategy, and Market Performance > L10 - General L - Industrial Organization > L1 - Market Structure, Firm Strategy, and Market Performance > L12 - Monopoly ; Monopolization Strategies M - Business Administration and Business Economics ; Marketing ; Accounting ; Personnel Economics > M1 - Business Administration > M10 - General M - Business Administration and Business Economics ; Marketing ; Accounting ; Personnel Economics > M2 - Business Economics > M21 - Business Economics |
Item ID: | 67314 |
Depositing User: | Izabela Luiza Pop |
Date Deposited: | 26 Oct 2015 19:59 |
Last Modified: | 26 Sep 2019 11:03 |
References: | Bruneckienė, J., Pekarskienė, I., Guzavičius, A., Palekienė, O., Šovienė, J. (2015). Assessment of Cartel Impact on the National Economy: Integrated Model. In The Impact of Cartels on National Economy and Competitiveness (pp. 217-229). Springer International Publishing. Bruneckienė, J., Pekarskienė, I., Guzavičius, A., Palekienė, O., Šovienė, J. (2015b). Cartel Occurrence and Operation in Market. In The Impact of Cartels on National Economy and Competitiveness (pp. 49-67). Springer International Publishing. Business24.ro, (2011). P&G si Unilever - amendă de 315,2 milioane de euro, http://www.business24.ro/unilever/stiri-unilever/p-g-si-unilever-amenda-de-315-2-milioane-de-euro-1489463, retrieved in May 8th, 2013. Connor, J. M., & Lande, R. H. (2012). Cartels as Rational Business Strategy: Crime Pays. Cardozo Law Review, 34(2), 427-490. Consiliul Concurenţei, Ce sunt cartelurile? http://www.clementa.ro/ro/carteluri.html, retrieved in April 8th, 2013. Consiliul Concurenţei, (2011). Decizia nr. 59 din 18.11.2011, http://www.consiliulconcurentei.ro/uploads/docs/items/id7298/decizie_taxi_mm_site.pdf, retrieved in May 10th, 2013. Hahn, R. F., Sabou, S., Toader, R., Rădulescu, C. (2013). Worldwide Competition Strategies Between Ethical and Unethical Practices. Review Of Management & Economic Engineering, 12(1). Matache, C., (2005). Marile carteluri distrug concurenţa prin legea tăcerii, http://www.hotnews.ro/stiri-arhiva-1211490-marile-carteluri-distrug-concurenta-prin-legea-tacerii.htm, retrieved in April 8th, 2015. Matache, C., (2011). Legea tăcerii impusă de carteluri a fost încălcată. A apărut primul „turnător“, http://incomemagazine.ro/articles/legea-tacerii-impusa-de-carteluri-a-fost-incalcata-a-aparut-primul-turnator, retrieved in May 8th, 2013. Kuorelahti, E. (2015). Boom, depression and cartelisation: Swedish and Finnish timber export industry 1918–1921. Scandinavian Economic History Review,63(1), 45-68. Levenstein, M. C., Suslow, V. Y. (2006). What Determines Cartel Success?. Journal Of Economic Literature, 44(1), 43-95. Parc, J. (2015). Does cartelization deteriorate or enhance industrial competitiveness? A case study of the Korean automotive industry. Entreprises et histoire, 76(3), 92-106. Pescaru, C., (2012). Cartelurile, copii întunecaţi ai Europei, http://www.ziare.com/afaceri/firma/cartelurile-copiii-intunecati-ai-europei-1209622, retrieved in May 8th, 2013. Rădulescu, M.C., Boca, G.D, Toader, C., (2015). Factors which contribute to clustering process. International Journal of Management, IT and Engineering, 5(4), 123-137. Scărişoreanu, M., (2009). Politica de clemenţă învinge 90% din carteluri, în UE. În România, nu. http://www.capital.ro/detalii-articole/stiri/politica-de-clementa-invinge-90-din-carteluri-in-ue-in-romania-nu-125013.html, retrieved in May 8th, 2013. Smith, R.A., (1961). Marea conspiraţie din industria de echipamente electrice, în Scandal! Escrocherii care au zguduit lumea, pp. 88-102, editura Litera, 2009, Bucureşti. Stellios, K., Hancock, B. (2014). Cartels - time for clarity. Law & Financial Markets Review, 8(3), 204-213. doi:10.5235/17521440.8.3.204 Toreanik, A., (2010). ArcelorMittal, amendat cu 315 milioane de euro pentru cel mai mare cartel din Europa, http://www.ziare.com/afaceri/producatori/arcelormittal-amendat-cu-315-milioane-de-euro-pentru-cel-mai-mare-cartel-din-europa-1026487, retrieved in May 8th, 2013. |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/67314 |