Namasaka, Martin (2015): Trade as a Collective Action Problem.
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_68146.pdf Download (318kB) | Preview |
Abstract
This article concerns the question whether free trade can be seen as a collective action problem. More specifically, I investigate whether one key characteristic of collective action is present in the case of trade: a common interest. I argue that while states at an aggregate level might have such a common interest, this does not automatically mean that governments will advance this interest in practice. Whether they will depends on accountability mechanisms within the state. I will show that within various accountability systems, there are reasons why governments will not advance the aggregate state interest. This opens up the floor to a more power-driven perspective on trade. I will first elaborate briefly on how the theory of collective action can be applied to trade and why states should have a common interest in free trade. Secondly, I will investigate why democratic and autocratic regimes respectively, might not advance this common interest. This will lead to my argument of viewing trade from a power perspective.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | Trade as a Collective Action Problem |
English Title: | Trade as a Collective Action Problem |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | Regional Trade, Collective Action, Integration |
Subjects: | D - Microeconomics > D7 - Analysis of Collective Decision-Making D - Microeconomics > D7 - Analysis of Collective Decision-Making > D78 - Positive Analysis of Policy Formulation and Implementation F - International Economics > F1 - Trade F - International Economics > F1 - Trade > F13 - Trade Policy ; International Trade Organizations F - International Economics > F1 - Trade > F15 - Economic Integration F - International Economics > F1 - Trade > F16 - Trade and Labor Market Interactions O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O1 - Economic Development O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O1 - Economic Development > O19 - International Linkages to Development ; Role of International Organizations |
Item ID: | 68146 |
Depositing User: | Mr Abdi Dika |
Date Deposited: | 02 Dec 2015 13:07 |
Last Modified: | 26 Sep 2019 09:47 |
References: | Gruber, Lloyd, 2001. Power Politics and the Free Trade Bandwagon. Comparative Political Studies 34, 7: 703-741. Moe, Terry. 1995. The Politics of Structural Choice: Toward a Theory of Public Bureaucracy. In: Oliver E. Williamson ed. Organization Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Olson, Mancur. 1971. The logic of collective action. Harvard: Harvard University Press. Olson, Mancur. 1982. The Rise and Decline of Nations. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press. Olson, Mancur. 1993. Dictatorship, democracy and development. The American Political Science Review 87, 3: 567-576. Ray, Debraj. 1998. Development Economics. Princeton: Princeton University Press. Rodrik, Dani. 1998a. Why Is Trade Reform So Difficult in Africa? Journal of African Economies 7, Supplement 1: 43-69. Rodrik, Dani. 1998b. Why Do More Open Economies Have Bigger Governments? Journal of Political Economy 106, 5: 997-1032. World Bank. 2004. Making services work for poor people. World Development Report 2004. Washington: World Bank. |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/68146 |