Capital Theory ‘Paradoxes’ and Paradoxical Results: Resolved or Continued?

Mariolis, Theodore and Tsoulfidis, Lefteris (2015): Capital Theory ‘Paradoxes’ and Paradoxical Results: Resolved or Continued?

Abstract

Capital theory controversies and ‘paradoxes’ showed that, due to price-feedback effects, the wage-production price-profit rate curves may display shapes inconsistent with the requirements of the neoclassical theory of value and distribution. Subsequent findings on a number of quite diverse actual single-product economies suggested that the impact of those effects is of limited empirical significance. This paper argues that, by focusing on the distributions of the eigenvalues and singular values of the system matrices, we can further study these issues and derive some meaningful theoretical results consistent with the available empirical evidence. Consequently, the real paradox, in the sense of knowledge vacuum and, thus, requiring further research, is the distributions of the characteristic values and not really the ‘paradoxes in capital theory’.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: Capital Theory; Characteristic value distributions; Hyper-basic industry; Spectral decompositions; Wage-price-profit rate curves
• Subjects: B - History of Economic Thought, Methodology, and Heterodox Approaches > B2 - History of Economic Thought since 1925 > B21 - Microeconomics; B - History of Economic Thought, Methodology, and Heterodox Approaches > B5 - Current Heterodox Approaches > B51 - Socialist ; Marxian ; Sraffian; C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C6 - Mathematical Methods ; Programming Models ; Mathematical and Simulation Modeling > C67 - Input-Output Models; D - Microeconomics > D5 - General Equilibrium and Disequilibrium > D57 - Input-Output Tables and Analysis

References

Angeloussis, A. (2006). An empirical investigation of the reswitching of techniques phenomenon for the Greek economy, 1988-1992 (Master’s Thesis, Department of Public Administration, Panteion University, Athens, Greece) (in Greek).

Aruka, Y. (1991). Generalized Goodwin’s theorems on general coordinates. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, 2(1), 69-91. Reprinted in Y. Aruka (Ed.) (2011), Complexities of production and interacting human behaviour (pp. 39-66). Heidelberg: Physica-Verlag.

Bienenfeld, M. (1988). Regularity in price changes as an effect of changes in distribution. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 12(2), 247-255.

Bidard, C., & Ehrbar, H.G. (2007). Relative prices in the classical theory: Facts and figures. Bulletin of Political Economy, 1(2), 161-211.

Bródy, A. (1970). Proportions, prices and planning. A mathematical restatement of the labor theory of value. Budapest: Akadémiai Kiadó, and Amsterdam: North-Holland.

Garegnani, P. (1970). Heterogeneous capital, the production function and the theory of distribution. The Review of Economic Studies, 37(3), 407-436.

Han, Z., and Schefold, B. (2006). An empirical investigation of paradoxes: Reswitching and reverse capital deepening in capital theory. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 30(5), 737-765.

Horn, R.A., & Johnson, C.R. (1991). Topics in matrix analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Iliadi, F., Mariolis, T., Soklis, G., & Tsoulfidis, L. (2014). Bienenfeld’s approximation of production prices and eigenvalue distribution: Further evidence from five European economies. Contributions to Political Economy, 33(1), 35-54.

Krelle, W. (1977). Basic facts in capital theory. Some lessons from the controversy in capital theory. Revue d’Économie Politique, 87(2), 282-329.

Kurz, H.D. & Salvadori, N. (1995). Theory of production. A long-period analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Leontief, W. (1953). Studies in the structure of the American economy. New York: Oxford University Press.

Mariolis, T. (2013). Applying the mean absolute eigen-deviation of labour commanded prices from labour values to actual economies. Applied Mathematical Sciences, 7(104), 5193-5204.

Mariolis, T. (2015). Norm bounds and a homographic approximation for the wage-profit curve. Metroeconomica, 66(2), 263-283.

Mariolis, T., & Soklis, G. (2010). Additive labour values and prices of production: evidence from the supply and use tables of the French, German and Greek economies. Economic Issues, 15(2), 87-107.

Mariolis, T., Soklis, G., & Zouvela, E. (2013). Testing Böhm-Bawerk’s theory of capital: Some evidence from the Finnish economy. The Review of Austrian Economics, 26(2), 207-220.

Mariolis, T., & Tsoulfidis, L. (2009). Decomposing the changes in production prices into ‘capital-intensity’ and ‘price’ effects: Theory and evidence from the Chinese economy. Contributions to Political Economy, 28(1), 1-22.

Mariolis, T., & Tsoulfidis, L. (2011). Eigenvalue distribution and the production price-profit rate relationship: Theory and empirical evidence. Evolutionary and Institutional Economics Review, 8(1), 87-122.

Mariolis, T., & Tsoulfidis, L. (2014). On Bródy’s conjecture: Theory, facts and figures about instability of the US economy. Economic Systems Research, 26(2), 209-223.

Mariolis, T. & Tsoulfidis, L. (2015). Modern classical economics and reality: A spectral analysis of the theory of value and distribution. Tokyo: Springer Verlag (forthcoming).

Meyer, C.D. (2001). Matrix analysis and applied linear algebra. New York: Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics.

Neumann, J.v. (1937). Über ein ökonomisches Gleichungssystem und eine Verallgemeinerung des Brouwerschen Fixpunktsatzes. In K. Menger (Ed.), Ergebnisse eines Mathematischen Kolloquiums, 8 (pp. 73-83). Leipzig: Deuticke.

Ochoa, E. (1989). Value, prices and wage-profit curves in the U.S. economy. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 13(3), 413-429.

Pasinetti, L. (1977). Lectures on the theory of production. New York: Columbia University Press.

Petrović, P. (1991). Shape of a wage-profit curve, some methodology and empirical evidence. Metroeconomica, 42(2), 93-112.

Schefold, B. (1971). Mr. Sraffa on joint production (Ph.D. Thesis, University of Basle, Basle, Switzerland).

Schefold, B. (2008). Families of strongly curved and of nearly linear wage curves: a contribution to the debate about the surrogate production function. Bulletin of Political Economy, 2 (1), pp. 1-24.

Sekerka, B., Kyn, O., & Hejl, L. (1970). Price system computable from input-output coefficients. In A.P. Carter & A. Bródy (Eds.), Contributions to Input-Output Analysis (pp. 183-203). Amsterdam: North-Holland.

Shaikh, A.M. (1998). The empirical strength of the labour theory of value. In R. Bellofiore (Ed.), Marxian economics: A reappraisal (Volume 2, pp. 225-251). New York: St. Martin’s Press.

Shaikh, A.M. (2012). The empirical linearity of Sraffa’s critical output-capital ratios. In C. Gehrke, N. Salvadori, I. Steedman & R. Sturn (Eds.), Classical political economy and modern theory. Essays in honour of Heinz Kurz (pp. 89-101). London and New York: Routledge.

Soklis, G. (2011). Shape of wage-profit curves in joint production systems: Evidence from the supply and use tables of the Finnish economy. Metroeconomica, 62(4), 548-560.

Soklis, G. (2015). Labour versus alternative value bases in actual joint production systems. Bulletin of Political Economy, 9(1) (forthcoming).

Spaventa, L. (1970). Rate of profit, rate of growth, and capital intensity in a simple production model. Oxford Economic Papers, 22(2), 129-147.

Sraffa, P. (1960). Production of commodities by means of commodities. Prelude to a critique of economic theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Steedman, I. (1999). Vertical integration and ‘reduction to dated quantities of labour’. In G. Mongiovi & F. Petri (Eds.), Value distribution and capital. Essays in honour of Pierangelo Garegnani (pp. 314-318). London and New York: Routledge.

Treitel, S., & Shanks, J.L. (1971). The design of multistage separable planar filters. Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Transactions on Geoscience Electronics, 9(1), 10-27.

Tsoulfidis, L., & Mariolis, T. (2007). Labour values, prices of production and the effects of income distribution: Evidence from the Greek economy. Economic Systems Research, 19(4), 425-437.