Spatial determinants of land prices: Does Auckland’s metropolitan urban limit have an effect?

Grimes, Arthur and Liang, Yun (2009): Spatial determinants of land prices: Does Auckland’s metropolitan urban limit have an effect? Published in: Applied Spatial Analysis and Policy , Vol. 2, No. 1 (February 2009): pp. 23-45.

Abstract

Land prices within monocentric cities typically decline from the centre to the urban periphery. More complex patterns are observed in polycentric and coastal cities; discrete jumps in value can occur across zoning boundaries. Auckland (New Zealand) is a polycentric, coastal city with clear-cut zoning boundaries. Information on land price patterns within the city is important to understand the nature of development and the effects of regulation in causing discrete land valuation changes. One key zoning regulation in Auckland is a growth boundary, termed the metropolitan urban limit (MUL). We examine whether the existence of this growth limit affects land prices. We do so in the context of a model of all Auckland land values over a twelve year period, finding a strong zoning boundary effect on land prices. Specifically, after controlling for other factors, we find that land just inside the MUL boundary is valued (per hectare) at approximately 10 times land that is just outside the boundary.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: Boundary effects, Growth limits, Land value gradients, Zoning restrictions
• Subjects: R - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics > R3 - Real Estate Markets, Spatial Production Analysis, and Firm Location > R31 - Housing Supply and Markets; R - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics > R5 - Regional Government Analysis > R52 - Land Use and Other Regulations

References

Anas, A., & Hyok-Joo, R. (2006). Curbing excess sprawl with congestion tolls and urban boundaries. Regional Science and Urban Economics, 36, 510–541.

Anas, A., & Hyok-Joo, R. (2007). When are urban growth boundaries not second-best policies to congestion tolls? Journal of Urban Economics, 61, 263–286.

Arnott, R. (1979). Unpriced transport congestion. Journal of Economic Theory, 21, 294–316.

Anselin, L. (1988). Spatial econometrics: Methods and models. Dordrecht: Kluwer.

Anthony, J. (2003). The effects of Florida’s growth management act on housing affordability. Journal of the American Planning Association, 69, 282–295.

Auckland Regional Growth Forum (1999). Metropolitan urban limits: Impact on land prices. Auckland: ARGS.

Bourassa, S., Martin, H., & Jian, S. (2006). The price of aesthetic externalities. The Appraisal Journal, 74(1), 14–29.

Crampton, P., Salmond, R. C. E., Kirkpatrick, R. S., & Skelly, C. (2000). Degrees of deprivation in New Zealand: An atlas of socioeconomic difference. Albany: David Bateman.

Dowall, D. E. (1979). The effect of land use and environmental regulations on housing costs. Policy Studies Journal, 8, 277–288.

Dowall, D. E., & Landis, J. (1982). Land use controls and housing costs: An examination of the San Francisco Bay area communities. Journal of the American Real Estate and Urban Economics Association, 10, 67–93.

Downs, A. (1992). Regulatory barriers to affordable housing. Journal of the American Planning Association, 58, 419–421.

DTZ (2007). Housing supply in the Auckland Region 2000–2005: Auckland Region District plan review. Wellington: Motu Economic and Public Policy Research.

Glaeser, E., & Gyourko, J. (2002). The impact of zoning on housing affordability. HIER Discussion Paper 1948, Cambridge, MA: Harvard Institute of Economic Research.

Glaeser, E., Gyourko, J. (2003). The impact of building restrictions on housing affordability. FRBNY Economic Policy Review, June, pp. 21–29.

Glaeser, E., Gyourko, J., & Saks, R. (2005). Why is Manhattan so expensive? Regulation and the rise in housing prices. Journal of Law and Economics, 48(2), 331–369.

Glaeser, E., & Ward, B. A. (2006). The causes and consequences of land use regulation: Evidence from Greater Boston, NBER Working Paper 12601.

Grimes, A., Aitken, A., Mitchell, I., & Smith, V. (2007). Housing supply in the Auckland Region 2000–2005. Wellington: Centre for Housing Research Aotearoa New Zealand.

Grimes, A., & Liang, Y. (2007). An Auckland land value annual database. Motu Working Paper 07-04. Wellington: Motu Economic & Public Policy Research Trust.

Gyourko, J., Mayer, C., & Sinai, T. (2006) Superstar cities. NBERWorking Paper 12355, National Bureau of Economic Research.

Haughwout, A. (2002). Public infrastructure investments, productivity and welfare in fixed geographic areas. Journal of Public Economics, 83(3), 405–428.

Haurin, D., Dietz, R., & Weinberg, B. (2003). The impact of neighborhood homeownership rates: A review of the theoretical and empirical literature. Journal of Housing Research, 13(2), 119–151.

Kanemoto, Y. (1977). Cost–benefit analysis and the second-best land use for transportation. Journal of Urban Economics, 4, 483–503.

Katz, L., & Rosen, K. T. (1987). The interjurisdictional effects of growth controls on housing prices. Journal of Law and Economics, 30, 149–160.

Knaap, G. J., & Hopkins, L. D. (2001). The inventory approach to urban growth boundaries. Journal of the American Planning Association, 67(3), 314–326.

Landis, J. (1986). Land regulation and the price of new housing: Lessons from three Californian cities. Journal of the American Planning Association, 52, 9–21.

Malpezzi, S. (1996). Housing prices, externalities, and regulation in U.S. Metropolitan areas. Journal of Housing Research, 7(2), 209–241.

McMillen, D., & McDonald, J. (2004). Reaction of house prices to a new rapid transit line: Chicago’s midway line, 1983–1999. Real Estate Economics, 32, 463–486.

Moran, P. (1950). Notes on continuous stochastic phenomena. Biometrika, 37, 17–33.

Pendall, R. (1999). Do land use controls cause sprawl? Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 26, 555–571.

Pendall, R., Puentes, R., & Martin, J. (2006). From traditional to reformed: A review of the land use regulations in the nation’s 50 largest metropolitan areas. Research Brief, The Brookings Institution, August.

Pines, D., & Sadka, E. (1985). Zoning, first-best, second-best and third-best criteria for allocating land to roads. Journal of Urban Economics, 17, 167–183.

Roback, J. (1982). Wages, rents and the quality of life. Journal of Political Economy, 90, 1257–1278.

Ryan, C. M., Wilson, J. P., & Fulton, W. (2004). Living on the edge: Growth policy choices for Ventura county and Southern California. In J. R. Wolch, M. Pastor, & P. Dreier (Eds.), Regional futures: Public policy and the making of 21st century Los Angeles. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

Samarshinghe, O. E., & Sharp, B. M. H. (2007). Analysing spatial effects in hedonic house price models. Draft mimeo, University of Auckland.

Schwartz, S., Hansen, D., & Green, R. (1981). Suburban growth controls and the price of new housing. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 8, 303–320.

Zorn, P., Hansen, D., & Schwartz, S. I. (1986). Mitigating the price effects of growth control regulations: A case study of Davis, California. Land Economics, 62, 46–57.