Sądy postulatywne w ekonomii głównego nurtu

Karbowski, Adam (2011): Sądy postulatywne w ekonomii głównego nurtu. Published in: Kwartalnik Nauk o Przedsiębiorstwie , Vol. 21, (2011): pp. 40-44.

Abstract

The following paper discusses types of scientific postulative claims and their role in today’s mainstream economics. In the core part of the article the author shows how the fundamental theoretic axioms (especially those regarding underlying principles of human economic behavior) may lead to inadequate conclusions and fierce misconceptions. The analysis is constrained to economics as a nomological science.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• English Title: Postulative Claims in Mainstream Economics
• Language: Polish
• Keywords: economic methodology, philosophy of science, concept of humans in economics, postulative claims
• Subjects: B - History of Economic Thought, Methodology, and Heterodox Approaches > B4 - Economic Methodology > B41 - Economic Methodology; D - Microeconomics > D0 - General > D01 - Microeconomic Behavior: Underlying Principles

References

Amsterdamski, S. (1983), Nauka a porządek świata, PWN, Warszawa.

Archibald, G. (1959), Welfare Economics, ethics, and essentialism, Economica, No. 104, s. 316-327.

Blaug, M. (1995), Metodologia ekonomii, PWN, Warszawa.

Camerer, C., Thaler, R. (1995), Anomalies: Dictators, Ultimatums, and Manners, Journal of Economic Perspectives, No. 9, s. 209-219.

Eichner, A. (1983), Why Economics is not yet a Science, M.E. Sharpe, New York.

Fehr, E., Gächter, S. (2002), Altruistic punishment in humans, Nature, No. 415, s. 137-140.

Gowdy, J. (2004), Altruism, evolution, and welfare economics, Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, No. 53, s. 69-73.

Hendrikse, G. (2003), Economics and Management of Organizations: Co – ordination, Motivation and Strategy, McGraw – Hill, New York.

Sławiński, A. (2006), Rynki finansowe, PWE, Warszawa.

Sulejewicz, A. (2009), Ile ekonomii chcemy (i możemy) uczyć?, Gazeta SGH, nr 248, s. 12-14.

Tomer, J. (2007), What is behavioral economics, The Journal of Socio-Economics, No. 36, s. 463-479.