An Analysis of Introducing Unspawned Oysters in Japan Using a Contingent Valuation Method and Analytic Hierarchy Process

Wakamatsu, Hiroki and Miyata, Tsutom and Kamiyama, Ryutaro (2016): An Analysis of Introducing Unspawned Oysters in Japan Using a Contingent Valuation Method and Analytic Hierarchy Process.

Abstract

Demand for unshelled oysters has recently risen in Japan as oyster bars gain popularity among consumers. This study undertook consumer preference research to evaluate a new brand of unspawned oysters, “Amakoro,” compared with conventional oysters. We surveyed the willingness-to-pay (WTP) for both oyster types as well as consumers’ evaluation of the oysters’ appearance, fragrance, taste, and texture. Based on contingent valuation method and analytic hierarchy process, we analyzed how much each factor of consumers’ tastes explains WTP. The results show that Amakoro is preferred to the conventional oyster in terms of appearance, which is positively correlated to WTP, while the conventional oyster is inelastic to any kind of taste factors, but has a robust value. In addition, the results show that WTP largely depends on the characteristics of location and consumption pattern of oysters.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: AHP, Consumer Preference, CVM, Japan, Oyster, WTP
• Subjects: D - Microeconomics > D4 - Market Structure, Pricing, and Design; M - Business Administration and Business Economics ; Marketing ; Accounting ; Personnel Economics > M3 - Marketing and Advertising > M31 - Marketing; Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics ; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q2 - Renewable Resources and Conservation > Q22 - Fishery ; Aquaculture

References

Alfnes, F., Guttormsen, A. G., Steine, G., & Kolstad, K. (2006). Consumers' willingness to pay for the color of salmon: a choice experiment with real economic incentives. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 88(4), 1050–1061.

Baltagi, B. H. (1995). Econometric analysis of panel data. New York: Wiley.

Carson, R. T., Flores, N. E., & Meade, N. F. (2001). Contingent valuation: controversies and evidence. Environmental and Resource Economics, 19(2), 173–210.

Cummings, R. G., Harrison, G. W., & Rutstrom, E. E. (1995). Homegrown values and hypothetical surveys: is the dichotomous choice approach incentive-compatible? The American Economic Review, 85(1), 260–266.

Freeman, A. M. (2003). The measurement of environmental and resource values: theory and methods. Washington D.C., RFF Press.

Grabowski, J. H., Powers, S. P., Peterson, C. H., Powers, M. J., & Green, D. P. (2003). Consumer ratings of non-native (Crassostrea gigas and Crassostrea ariakensis) vs. native (Crassostrea virginica) oysters. Journal of Shellfish Research, 22(1), 21–30.

Greene, W. H. (2003). Econometric analysis. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.

Johnston, R. J., & Roheim, C. A. (2006). A battle of taste and environmental convictions for ecolabeled seafood: a contingent ranking experiment. Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, 31(2), 283–300.

Kahoku Shinpo. (2015). Debut of “Amakoro oyster”, symbol of recovery (in Japanese). In Kahoku Sinpo. Miyagi: Kahoku Sinpo Publishing.

Kallas, Z., & Gil, J. M. (2012). Combining contingent valuation with the analytical hierarchy process to decompose the value of rabbit meat. Food Quality and Preference, 24(2), 251–259.

Keller, K. L. (1993). Conceptualizing, measuring, and managing customer-based brand equity. Journal of Marketing, 57(1), 1–22.

Loureiro, M. L., & Lotade, J. (2005). Do fair trade and eco-labels in coffee wake up the consumer conscience? Ecological Economics, 53(1), 129–138.

Loureiro, M. L., McCluskey, J. J., & Mittelhammer, R. C. (2002). Will consumers pay a premium for eco-labeled apples? Journal of Consumer Affairs, 36(2), 203–219.

Lusk, J. L., & Schroeder, T. C. (2004). Are choice experiments incentive compatible? A test with quality differentiated beef steaks. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 86(2), 467–482.

Murphy, J. J., Allen, P. G., Stevens, T. H., & Weatherhead, D. (2005). A meta-analysis of hypothetical bias in stated preference valuation. Environmental & Resource Economics, 30(3), 313–325.

Nape, S., Frykblom, P., Harrison, G. W., & Lesley, J. C. (2003). Hypothetical bias and willingness to accept. Economics Letters, 78(3), 423–430.

Nguyen, T. T., Haider, W., Solgaard, H. S., Ravn-Jonsen, L., & Roth, E. (2015). Consumer willingness to pay for quality attributes of fresh seafood: a labeled latent class model. Food Quality and Preference, 41, 225–236.

Quagrainie, K. K., & Engle, C. R. (2006). A latent class model for analyzing preferences for catfish. Aquaculture Economics & Management, 10(1), 1–14.

Rutström, E. E. (1998). Home-grown values and incentive compatible auction design. International Journal of Game Theory, 27(3), 427–441.

Saaty, T. L. (1977). A scaling method for priorities in hierarchical structures. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 15(3), 234–281.

Saaty, T. L. (1988). What is the analytic hierarchy process? New York. Springer. Tanner, M. D., Lusk, J. L., & List, J. A. (2005). Is hypothetical bias a universal phenomenon? A multi-national investigation. Working Paper.

Tohoku Regional Agricultural Administration Office. (2014). 61st annual statistics of agriculture, forestry and fisheries in Miyagi. In. Sendai.

Wirth, F. F., Love, L. A., & Palma, M. A. (2007). Purchasing shrimp for at-home consumption: the relative importance of credence versus physical product features. Aquaculture Economics & Management, 11(1), 17–37.