An empirical investigation of causal linkages between domestic terrorism and macroeconomic variables: a case for Pakistan

Bukhari, Naseem and Masih, Mansur (2016): An empirical investigation of causal linkages between domestic terrorism and macroeconomic variables: a case for Pakistan.

Abstract

While the root causes of terrorism are multidimensional – ranging from religious extremism to a sense of alienation from society to anger at perceived geopolitical injustice – economic factors can help explain the rise of terrorism. With the help of the ARDL bounds testing approach followed by variance decomposition (VDC) and impulse response (IR) function, this study provides an empirical investigation to determine the causal relationship of the variables of economic growth, trade, military spending, education spending and unemployment on the onslaught of terrorism in Pakistan. The results of the overall study clearly conform to the deprivation and modernization hypotheses that underdevelopment and poverty do provide fertile grounds to terrorists for new recruits while unequal growth could equally facilitate the spread of terrorism. According to our analysis, in the short run, terrorism is most affected by the variables of trade and GDP. However, in the long-run, two startling outcomes are the positive and significant relationships between GDP growth and terrorism, and also between military spending and terrorism which imply that increased economic growth and military spending breed terrorism. The first relationship can be explained on the basis of rising income inequality and modernization hypothesis. The second linkage can be the aftermath of government’s asymmetric military spending at the expense of critical development sectors like education which significantly reduce the opportunity cost of terrorism in the society as elicited by a significant long-run relationship between military spending and education. The overall result of the study has many significant policy implications including shifting the precedence of military spending and war on terror towards the more desirable socio-economic sectors of education, trade and employment.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: causality, terrorism, macroeconomic variables, ARDL
• Subjects: C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C2 - Single Equation Models ; Single Variables > C22 - Time-Series Models ; Dynamic Quantile Regressions ; Dynamic Treatment Effect Models ; Diffusion Processes; C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C5 - Econometric Modeling > C58 - Financial Econometrics; K - Law and Economics > K4 - Legal Procedure, the Legal System, and Illegal Behavior

References

Abadie, & Gardeazabal. (2003). The economic costs of conflict: A case study of the Basque Country. American economic review, 113-132.

Abadie, & Gardeazabal. (2008). Terrorism and the world economy. European Economic Review, 52(1), 127.

Banerjee, & Newman. (1993). Occupational choice and the process of development. Journal of political economy, 274-298.

Blomberg, Hess, & Orphanides. (2004). The macroeconomic consequences of terrorism. Journal of Monetary Economics, 51(5), 1007-1032.

Caruso, & Schneider. (2011). The socio-economic determinants of terrorism and political violence in Western Europe (1994–2007). European Journal of Political Economy, 27, S37-S49.

Chen, & Siems. (2004). The effects of terrorism on global capital markets. European journal of political economy, 20(2), 349-366.

Coe, & Helpman. (1995). International r&d spillovers. European economic review, 39(5), 859-887.

Collier. (1999). On the economic consequences of civil war. Oxford economic papers, 51(1), 168-183.

Collier, & Hoeffler. (2004). Greed and grievance in civil war. Oxford economic papers, 56(4), 563-595.

Derin‐Güre. (2011). Separatist Terrorism And The Economic Conditions In South‐Eastern Turkey. Defence and Peace Economics, 22(4), 393-407.

Eckstein, & Tsiddon. (2004). Macroeconomic consequences of terror: theory and the case of Israel. Journal of Monetary Economics, 51(5), 971-1002.

Enders, & Sandler. (1996). Terrorism and foreign direct investment in Spain and Greece. Kyklos, 49(3), 331352.

Engle, & Granger. (1987). Co-integration and error correction: representation, estimation, and testing. Econometrica: journal of the Econometric Society, 251-276.

Estrada, Park, Kim, & Khan. (2015). The economic impact of terrorism: A new model and its application to Pakistan. Journal of Policy Modeling, 37(6), 1065-1080.

Fair. (2004). Militant recruitment in Pakistan: Implications for Al Qaeda and other organizations. Studies in Conflict and Terrorism, 27(6), 489-504.

Frey, Luechinger, & Stutzer. (2007). Calculating tragedy: Assessing the costs of terrorism. Journal of Economic Surveys, 21(1), 1-24.

Freytag, & Thurik. (2010). Entrepreneurship and its determinants in a cross-country setting: Springer.

Gaibulloev, & Sandler. (2008). Growth consequences of terrorism in Western Europe. Kyklos, 61(3), 411424.

Gassebner, & Luechinger. (2011). Lock, stock, and barrel: A comprehensive assessment of the determinants of terror. Public Choice, 149(3-4), 235-261.

Ismail, & Amjad. (2014). Determinants of terrorism in Pakistan: An empirical investigation. Economic Modelling, 37, 320-331.

Javaid. (2015). Operation Zarb-e-Azb: A Successful Initiative to Curtail Terrorism. South Asian Studies, 30, 2.

Johansen, & Juselius. (1990). Maximum likelihood estimation and inference on cointegration with applications to the demand for money. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and statistics, 52(2), 169-210.

Knight, Loayza, & Villanueva. (1996). The peace dividend: military spending cuts and economic growth. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper(1577).

Krueger, & Malečková. (2003). Education, poverty and terrorism: Is there a causal connection? The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 17(4), 119-144.

Lai, & Thyne. (2007). The effect of civil war on education, 1980—97. Journal of Peace Research, 44(3), 277-292.

Laurenceson, & Chai. (2003). Financial reform and economic development in China: Edward Elgar Publishing.

Li, & Schaub. (2004). Economic Globalization and Transnational Terrorism A Pooled Time-Series Analysis. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 48(2), 230-258.

MacCulloch. (2004). The impact of income on the taste for revolt. American Journal of Political Science, 48(4), 830-848.

Mirza, & Verdier. (2008). International trade, security and transnational terrorism: Theory and a survey of empirics. Journal of Comparative Economics, 36(2), 179-194.

Muhammad, Muhammad, & Muhammad. (2011). Does economic growth cause terrorism in Pakistan?

Nasir, Arif, & Rehman. (2008). Ur. and Tariq MS (2008) Terrorism and economic growth: a case study of Pakistan. GCU Economic Journal, 41(2), 1-22.

Nitsch, & Schumacher. (2004). Terrorism and international trade: an empirical investigation. European Journal of Political Economy, 20(2), 423-433.

Pesaran, Shin, & Smith. (1999). Pooled mean group estimation of dynamic heterogeneous panels. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 94(446), 621-634.

Pesaran, Shin, & Smith. (2001). Bounds testing approaches to the analysis of level relationships. Journal of applied econometrics, 16(3), 289-326.

Pesaran, & Smith. (1998). Structural analysis of cointegrating VARs. Journal of Economic Surveys, 12(5), 471-505.

Phillips, & Hansen. (1990). Statistical inference in instrumental variables regression with I (1) processes. The Review of Economic Studies, 57(1), 99-125.

Piazza. (2006). Rooted in poverty?: Terrorism, poor economic development, and social cleavages 1. Terrorism and Political Violence, 18(1), 159-177.

Sánchez-Cuenca, & De la Calle. (2009). Domestic terrorism: The hidden side of political violence. Annual Review of Political Science, 12, 31-49.

Sandler, & Enders. (2008). Economic consequences of terrorism in developed and developing countries. Terrorism, economic development, and political openness, 17.

Shahbaz, Shabbir, Malik, & Wolters. (2013). An analysis of a causal relationship between economic growth and terrorism in Pakistan. Economic Modelling, 35, 21-29.

Zhang, & Yue. (2002). Do the Exchange Rates Matter for Chinese Stock Market: Evidence from ARDL-ecm Estimation [J]. Journal of Finance, 7, 26-35.