Çevre Kirliliği Ve Ekonomik Büyüme İlişkisi Gelişmiş ve Gelişmekte Olan Ülkelerin Veri Görselleştirme Kullanarak Karşılaştırılması

Ertürk, Mevlüde (2016): Çevre Kirliliği Ve Ekonomik Büyüme İlişkisi Gelişmiş ve Gelişmekte Olan Ülkelerin Veri Görselleştirme Kullanarak Karşılaştırılması.

Abstract

The aim of the study is to investigate relationship between environmental pollution and economic growth. For this aim, two groups of countries are compared which are developed countries and developing countries. Germany, France, UK and Netherland which are the member of EU are chosen as a developed countries and Brazil, Russia, India and China which are known as BRIC countries are chosen as a developing countries. In this study descriptive statistics are analyzed by data visualization techniques using 2000-2010 period annual data. The results show that the relationship between environmental pollution and economic growth is differentiating based on development level of the countries.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• English Title: The Relation Between Environmental Pollution and Economic Growth A Comparıson of Developed and Developing Countries Using Data Visualization
• Language: Turkish
• Keywords: Environmental Pollution, Economic Growth, CO2 Emission, Data Visualization
• Subjects: C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C1 - Econometric and Statistical Methods and Methodology: General; O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O4 - Economic Growth and Aggregate Productivity; Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics ; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q5 - Environmental Economics

References

Akbostancı, E., Türüt Aşık, S. & İpek, Tunç G.; (2006). İmalat Sanayi ve Kirlilik: Bir Kirli Endüstri Sığınağı Olarak Türkiye, Ankara Üniversitesi Siyasal Bilgiler Fakültesi Dergisi. Cilt:60. No:1. ss. 1-2. Akyıldız, B.; (2008). Çevresel Etkinlik Analizi: Kuznets Eğrisi Yaklaşımı, Yüksek Lisans Tezi. Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi. Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü. Altuğ, Fevzi (1990). Çevre Sorunları, Bursa, Uludağ Üniversitesi Yayını. Barrett, S., Kathyrn, G.; (2000). Freedom, Growth and Environment, Environmental and Development Economics, CamCambridge University Press. Başar, S., Temerlunk, M.S; (2007). Çevreye Uyarlanmış Kuznets Eğrisi: Türkiye Üzerine Bir Uygulama, İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi, Cilt: 21, Sayı: 1, ss.1-12. Bilginoğlu, M. A.; (1989). Ekonomik Büyüme-Enerji-Çevre İlişkisi, Erciyes Üniversitesi İİBF Dergisi, 8, ss. 79-87. Borghesı, S; (1999). The Environmental Kuznets Curve: A Survey of the Literature, Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei (FEEM) Working Paper, 67. Dam, M.M., Karakaya, E. & BULUT, Ş; (2013). Çevresel Kuznets Eğrisi ve Türkiye: Amprik bir Analiz, Dumlupınar Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi EYİ 2013 Özel Sayısı. Deacon, R., Catherıne, S. N.; (2004). Does the Environmental Kuznets Curve Describe How Individual Countries Behave?, UCSB Working Papers. Demir, A.; (1973). Doğal Çevre Tahripleri ve Ekonomi İlişkileri Üzerine Bir Araştırma, AÜSBF Dergisi (Mart-Haziran), Cilt:XXVIII, No:1-2, s.133-166. Dında, S.; (2004). Environmental Kuznets Curve Hypothesis: A Survey, Ecological Economics, 49, 431–455. Erataş, F., Uysal, D.;(2014).Çevresel Kuznets Eğrisi Yaklaşımının “BRICT” Ülkeleri Kapsamında Değerlendirilmesi”, İktisat Fakültesi Mecmuası Cilt: 64, 2014/1 s, 1-25. Ertürk, H.; (1998). “Çevre Bilimlerine Giriş, Vipa Yayınları, Bursa. Fosten, J.,Morley, B. & Taylor, T.; (2012). Dynamic misspecification in the environmental Kuznets curve: Evidence from CO2 and SO2 emissions in the United Kingdom, Ecological Economics, 76, 25–33. Hıll, J.R.; Magnanı, E.; (2002). An Exploration of the Conceptual and Empirical Basis of the Environmental Kuznets Curve ,Australian Economic Papers, 239. Karapıçak, M.; Armağan, R.; (2004). Çevre Sorunlarının Ortaya Çıkış Süreci, Çevre Yönetiminin Temelleri ve Ekonomik Etkileri, Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Y.2004, C.9, S.2, s.203-228. Keleş, R.; (1997). Nüfus, Çevre ve Kentleşme, Nüfus, Çevre ve Kalkınma Konferansı. Kuznets, S; (1955). Economic growth and income inequality, American Economic Review, 45 (1), 1-28. Kuznets, S.; (1955). Economic Growth and Income Inequality, American Economic Reviews 17, 57–84. Muller-Furstenberger, G.; Martın, W.; (2007). Exploring The Environmental Kuznets Hypothesis: Therotical and Econometric Problem, Ecological Economics, 62(3-4), pp. 648-660. Muratoğlu, Y.; Uğurlu, E.; (2014). An Empirical Test of the Environmental Kuznets Curve for CO2 in G7: A Panel Cointergration Approach, The 67th Annual Conference of the New York State Economics Association , New York, USA, 10 – 11 Ekim. Öktem, M.; (2003). Kent, Çevre ve Globalleşme, İstanbul, Alfa Kitabevi, 1. Baskı. Panayotou, T.; (2000). Economic Growth and the Environment , CID Working Paper, No.56. Panayotu, T.; (1993). Emprical Test and Policy Analysis of Environmental Degradation at Different Stages of Economic Development ,Working Paper WP238, Technology and Employment Programme, International Labour Office. Raymond, L.; (2004). Economic Growth As Environmental Policy? Reconsidering The Environmental Kuznets Curve, Journal of Public Policy, 24(3), pp. 327-348. Sarısoy, S.; Yıldız, F.; (2006). Karbondioksit Salınımı ve Ekonomik Büyüme İlişkisi: Gelişmekte ve Gelişmekte Olan Ülkeler İçin Panel Veri Analizi, Sosyal Bilimler Metinleri. Shı, J.; (2004). Tests Of The EKC Hypothesis Using CO2 Panel Data, Department of Economics University of Victoria, Resource Economics and Policy Analysis (REPA) Research Group Working Paper, 2004-03, ss. 1-42. Song, T., Tıngguo, Z. & Lıanjun, T.; (2008). An Empirical Test Of The Environmental Kuznets Curve in China: A Panel Cointegration Approach, China Economic Review, 19, pp. 381-392. Stren, D.;(2004). The rise and fall of the environmental Kuznets curve, World Development, Volume: 32, 1419-1439. Surı, V.; Duane C.; (1998). Economic Growth, Trade and The Environment: Implications For The Environmental Kuznets Curve, Ecological Economics, 25, pp. 195-208. Uğurlu, E.; (2009). Real Exchange Rate And Economic Growth: Turkey, Manas Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 22, 191-212. Uğurlu, E.: (2010). Growth And Openness Relationship İn The EU-15: Panel Data Analysis, Ekonomika , Vol. 89 No. 2, pp. 44-54. Uğurlu, E.; (2013). Environmentally Sustainable Development for EU Member Countries: A Panel Data Model, International Conference on Applied Business and Economics (ICABE) 2013, 2-4 October, 2013, City University of New York, John Jay College of Criminal Justice, New York. Uğurlu, E.; (2014). The Impact of Urbanization on CO2 Emissions in Transition Countries, The 67th Annual Conference of the New York State Economics Association, New York, USA, 10–11 Ekim. Yavapolkul, N.; (2005). Environmental Kuznet Curve: Empirical Investigation Using Non-parametric Approach A Seminar Paper presented to Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics, University of California, Davis. Retrieved on 22/08/2011 pp.1-9). Yavuz, F.; Keleş, R.; (1983). Çevre Sorunları , Ankara, Ankara Üniversitesi, SBF Yayınları, 2. Baskı. Yıldırım, U.; (2004). Çevre Sorunlarına Ekonomik Yaklaşımlar. Zachariadis, T.; (2007). Exploring The Relationship Between Energy Use and Economic Growth With Bivariate Models: New Evidence From G-7 Countries , Energy Economics, 29(6), pp. 1233–1253.