Hattori, Keisuke (2016): Profit-maximizing Wages under Duopoly.
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_70288.pdf Download (150kB) | Preview |
Abstract
Using a simple duopoly model with endogenous order of moves, this study provides a potential explanation for why firms might pay their employees a higher wage than rival firms or the market-clearing rate: Setting a higher wage can serve as a commitment to obtain the preferred order of moves in subsequent price competition. This holds even if the wage increase does not enhance worker productivity or efficiency. Simultaneous wage setting admits no pure strategy Nash equilibrium, as their best responses form a cycle wherein firms repeatedly overbid in wages to preempt the preferred position in price competition. Sequential wage setting leads to wage dispersion even among homogeneous workers and firms: the wage-setting leader offers a high wage such that the rival firm would not want to overbid in equilibrium. In contrast, in quantity competition, duopolists have no such incentives because, ceteris paribus, a firm that pays a wage higher than the competitor will be unsuccessful in obtaining first-mover advantages in subsequent quantity competition.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | Profit-maximizing Wages under Duopoly |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | Endogenous timing; Price leadership; Wage setting; Heterogeneous duopoly; Wage commitment. |
Subjects: | C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C7 - Game Theory and Bargaining Theory > C72 - Noncooperative Games D - Microeconomics > D4 - Market Structure, Pricing, and Design > D43 - Oligopoly and Other Forms of Market Imperfection J - Labor and Demographic Economics > J3 - Wages, Compensation, and Labor Costs > J31 - Wage Level and Structure ; Wage Differentials L - Industrial Organization > L1 - Market Structure, Firm Strategy, and Market Performance > L13 - Oligopoly and Other Imperfect Markets |
Item ID: | 70288 |
Depositing User: | Keisuke Hattori |
Date Deposited: | 26 Mar 2016 10:08 |
Last Modified: | 12 Oct 2019 05:11 |
References: | Akerlof, G.A. (1982) Labor contracts as partial gift exchange. Quarterly Journal of Economics 98(4), 543-569. Amir, R., Stepanova, A. (2006) Second-mover advantage and price leadership in Bertrand duopoly. Games and Economic Behavior 55(1), 1-20. Brander J.A., Spencer, B.J. (1985) Export subsidies and international market share rivalry. Journal of International Economics 18(1), 83-100. Carlsson, H., van Damme, E. (1993) Global games and equilibrium selection. Econometrica, 61(5), 989-1018. van Damme, E., Hurkens, S., (1999) Endogenous Stackelberg leadership. Games and Economic Behavior 28(1), 105-129. van Damme, E., Hurkens, S., (2004) Endogenous price Leadership. Games and Economic Behavior 47(2), 404-420. Deneckere, R.J., Kovenock, D. (1992) Price leadership. Review of Economic Studies 59(1), 143-162. Eaton J., Grossman, G.M. (1986) Optimal trade and industrial policy under oligopoly. Quarterly Journal of Economics 101(2), 383-406. Edgeworth, F.Y. (1925) The pure theory of monopoly. Papers Relating to Political Economy 1. London: MacMilan, 111-142. Fudenberg, D., Tirole, J. (1986) A theory of exit in duopoly. Econometrica 54(4) 943-960. Ghemawat P., Nalebuff, B. (1985) Exit. Rand Journal of Economics 16(2), 184-194. Hamilton, J.H., Slutsky, S.M. (1990) Endogenous timing in duopoly games: Stackelberg or Cournot equilibria. Games and Economic Behavior 2(1), 29-46. Kandori, M., Mailath, G.J., Rob, R. (1993) Learning, mutation, and long run equilibria in games. Econometrica 61(1), 29-56. Kornhauser, L., Rubinstein, A., Wilson, C. (1989) Reputation and Patience in the War of Attrition. Economica 56(221), 15-24. Lucas, R.E., Prescott, E. (1974) Equilibrium search and unemployment. Journal of Economic Theory, 7(2), 188-209. Maskin, E., Tirole, J. (1988) A theory of dynamic oligopoly, II: Price competition, kinked demand curves, and Edgeworth cycles. Econometrica, 56(3), 571-599. McDonald, I.M., Solow, R.M. (1981) Wage bargaining and employment. American Economic Review 71(5), 896-908. Mortensen, D.T. (1970) Job search, the duration of unemployment, and the Phillips curve. American Economic Review, 60(5), 847-862. Mortensen, D.T. (2005) Wage dispersion: why are similar workers paid differently? MIT press. Mortensen, D.T., Pissarides, C. (1994) Job creation and job destruction in the theory of unemployment. Review of Economic Studies 61(3), 397-415. Myatt, D.P. (2005) Instant exit from the asymmetric war of attrition. Oxford University Economics Working Papers, No.¥ 160. Ohnishi, K. (2003) A model of a price-setting duopoly with a wage-rise contract. Australian Economic Papers 42(2), 149-157. Ohnishi, K. (2012) Wage-rise contract and quantity competition with profit-maximizing and labour-managed firms. Bulletin of Economic Research 64(2), 286-292. Pissarides, C. (1985) Short-run equilibrium dynamics of unemployment vacancies, and real wages. American Economic Review 75(4), 676-690. Shapiro, C., Stiglitz, J.E. (1984) Equilibrium unemployment as a worker discipline device. American Economic Review 74(3), 433-444. Stiglitz, J.E. (1974) Alternative theories of wage determination and unemployment in LDS's: The labor turnover model. Quarterly Journal of Economics 88(2), 194-227. |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/70288 |