Demeze, Herman and Moyouwou, Issofa and Pongou, Roland (2016): The Welfare Economics of Tactical Voting in Democracies: A Partial Identification Equilibrium Analysis.
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_70607.pdf Download (388kB) | Preview |
Abstract
The fact that voters can manipulate election outcomes by misrepresenting their true preferences over competing political parties or candidates is commonly viewed as a major flaw of democratic voting systems. It is argued that insincere voting typically leads to suboptimal voting outcomes. However, it is also understood that insincere voting is rational behavior as it may result in the election of a candidate preferred by the voter to the candidate who would otherwise be selected. The relative magnitude of the welfare gains and losses of those who benefit from and those adversely affected by insincere voting behavior is consequently an important empirical issue. We address this question by providing exact asymptotic bounds on the welfare effects, in equilibrium, of insincere voting for an infinite class of democratic rules. We find, for instance, that preference manipulation benefits one-half to two-thirds of the population in three-candidate elections held under first-past-the-post, and one-third to one-hundred percent of the population in antiplurality elections. These bounds differ from those obtained under out-of-equilibrium manipulation. Our partial identification analysis provides a novel approach to evaluating mechanisms as a function of attitude towards risk, and it has practical implications for the choice of election rules by a mechanism designer facing a worst-case or a best-case objective. It also provides a new answer to the longstanding question of why certain rules, such as first-past-the-post, are more common in practice.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | The Welfare Economics of Tactical Voting in Democracies: A Partial Identification Equilibrium Analysis |
English Title: | The Welfare Economics of Tactical Voting in Democracies: A Partial Identification Equilibrium Analysis |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | Democracy, tactical voting, political equilibrium, social welfare, mechanism design, worst-case-scenario, best-case-scenario, partial identification |
Subjects: | D - Microeconomics > D6 - Welfare Economics > D60 - General D - Microeconomics > D7 - Analysis of Collective Decision-Making > D72 - Political Processes: Rent-Seeking, Lobbying, Elections, Legislatures, and Voting Behavior D - Microeconomics > D8 - Information, Knowledge, and Uncertainty > D81 - Criteria for Decision-Making under Risk and Uncertainty H - Public Economics > H4 - Publicly Provided Goods > H41 - Public Goods P - Economic Systems > P4 - Other Economic Systems P - Economic Systems > P4 - Other Economic Systems > P48 - Political Economy ; Legal Institutions ; Property Rights ; Natural Resources ; Energy ; Environment ; Regional Studies |
Item ID: | 70607 |
Depositing User: | Dr. Roland Pongou |
Date Deposited: | 09 Apr 2016 13:26 |
Last Modified: | 29 Sep 2019 12:28 |
References: | Arrow, K.J. (1963): Social Choice and Individual Values. New York: Wiley. Barberà, S. (2011): Strategy-proof Social Choice. In: Arrow, K.J., Sen, A.K., and Suzumura, K. (eds.) Handbook of Social Choice and Welfare Volume 2. Amsterdam: North-Holland. Barberà, S., D. Berga, and B. Moreno (2016): "Group Strategy-Proofness in Private Good Economies," American Economic Review 106, 1073-1099. Bergemann, D., and Morris, S. (2005): "Robust Mechanism Design," Econometrica, 73, 1771-1813. Bhattacharya, S. (2013): "Preference Monotonicity and Information Aggregation in Elections," Econometrica, 81, 1229-1243. Black, D. (1958): Theory of Committees and Elections. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Campbell, D.E., and J.S. Kelly (2009): "Gains from Manipulating Social Choice Rules," Economic Theory, 40, 349-371. Campbell, D.E., and J.S. Kelly (2014): "Breadth of Loss Due to Manipulation," Economic Theory, 45, 453-467. Carroll, G. (2013): " A Quantitative Approach to Incentives: Application to Voting Rules," Mimeo. Carroll, G. (2015): "Robustness and Linear Contracts," American Economic Review 105, 536-563. Chassang, S. (2013): "Calibrated Incentive Contracts," Econometrica 81, 1935-1971. Chung, K., and Ely, J.C. (2007): "Foundations of Dominant-Strategy Mechanisms," Review of Economic Studies 74, 447-476. Diffo Lambo, L., Pongou, R., Tchantcho, B., and Wambo, P. (2015): "Networked Politics: Political Cycles and Instability under Social Influences," Mimeo. Dummett, M., and R. Farguharson (1961): "Stability in Voting," Econometrica, 29, 33-43. Ehlers, L., Peters, H., and Storcken, T. (2004): "Threshold Strategy-Proofness: On Manipulability in Large Voting Problems," Games and Economic Behavior, 49, 103-116. Feddersen, T.J., and W. Pesendorfer (1997): "Voting Behavior and Information Aggregation in Elections with Private Information," Econometrica, 65 (5), 1029-1058. Fish, S. (2008): "When "Identity Politics" is Rational," New York Times. Gibbard, A. (1973): "Manipulation of Voting Schemes: A General Result," Econometrica, 41, 587-601. Goertz, J., and F. Maniquet (2011): "On the Informational Efficiency of Simple Scoring Rules," Journal of Economic Theory 146, 1464-1480. Greenberg, J., Monderer, D., Shitovitz, B. (1996): "Multistage Situations," Econometrica 64, 1415-1437. Frankel, A. (2014): "Aligned Delegation," American Economic Review 104, 66-83. Harsanyi, J.C. (1974): "An Equilibrium-Point Interpretation of Stable Sets and a Proposed Alternative Definition," Management Science 20, 1472-1495. Hurwicz, L., and Shapiro, L. (1978): "Incentive Structures Maximizing Residual Gain under Incomplete Information," Bell Journal of Economics 9, 180-191. Ishima, J. (2012): "Explaining Ethnic Bloc Voting in Africa," Democratization, 19, 761-788. Koriyama, Y., and B. Szentes (2009): "A Resurrection of the Condorcet Jury Theorem," Theoretical Economics, 4, 227-252. Mas-Colell, A., Whinston, M.D., Green, J.R. (1995): Microeconomic Theory. London: Oxford University Press. Moyouwou, I, and R. Pongou (2012): "How Bad? The Social Welfare Consequences of Insincere Voting in Democracies," Mimeo. Moyouwou, I., Pongou, R., and Tchantcho, B. (2015): "Fraudulent Democracy: A Dynamic Ordinal Game Approach," Mimeo. Myatt, D. (2007): "On the Theory of Strategic Voting," Review of Economic Studies, 74, 255-281. Myerson, R.B. (1998): "Extended Poisson Games and the Condorcet Jury Theorem," Games Economic Behavior, 25, 111-131. Myerson, R.B. (2002): "Comparison of Scoring Rules in Poisson Voting Games," Journal of Economic Theory, 103, 219-251. Myerson, R.B., and R.J. Weber (1993): "A Theory of Voting Equilibria," American Political Science Review, 87, 102-114. Posner, D. (2004): "The Political Salience of Cultural Difference: Why Chewas and Tumbukas are Allies in Zambia and Adversaries in Malawi," American Political Science Review 98, 4, 529-545. Posner, D. (2005): Institutions and Ethnic Politics in Africa. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Ray, D., and Vohra, R. (2015): "The Farsighted Stable Sets," Econometrica 83, 977-1011. Saari, D.G. (1999): "Explaining All Three-Alternative Voting Outcomes," Journal of Economic Theory, 87, 313-355. Satterthwaite, M.A. (1975): "Strategy-proofness and Arrow's Conditions: Existence and Correspondence Theorems for Voting Procedures and Social Welfare Functions", Journal of Economic Theory, 10, 187-217. Segal, I. (2003): "Optimal Pricing Mechanisms with Unknown Demand," American Economic Review 93, 509-529. Sengupta, M. (1978): "On a Difficulty in the Analysis of Strategic Voting," Econometrica, 46, 331-343. Serrano, R. (2004): "The Theory of Implementation of Social Choice Rules," SIAM Review, 46, 377-414. Schummer, J. (2004): "Almost-Dominant Strategy Implementation: Exchange Economies," Games and Economic Behavior, 48, 154-170. Sonnenschein, H. (1998): The Economics of Incentives: An Introductory Account. In: Jacobs, D.P., Kalai, E.,Kamien, M.I. (eds.) Frontiers of Research in Economic Theory: The Nancy L. Schwartz Memorial Lectures, 1983--1997. London: Cambridge University Press. Vickrey, W. (1960): "Utility, Strategy, and Social Decision Rules," Quarterly Journal of Economics, 74, 507-535. Sönmez, T., and Ünver, U (2011): Matching, Allocation, and Exchange of Discrete Resources. In: Benhabib, J., Jackson, M.O., and Bisin, A. (eds.) Handbook of Social Economics, volume 1A. Amsterdam: North-Holland. Sprumont, Y. (1995): "Strategyproof Collective Choice in Economic and Political Environments," Canadian Journal of Economics 28, 68-107. Xue, L. (1998): "Coalitional Stability under Perfect Foresight," Economic Theory 11, 603-627. |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/70607 |