Anastasopoulos, Lefteris (2016): Estimating the gender penalty in House of Representative elections using a regression discontinuity design. Published in: Electoral Studies
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_71297.pdf Download (1MB) | Preview |
Abstract
While the number of female candidates running for office in U.S. House of Representative elections has increased considerably since the 1980s, women continue to account for about only 20% of House members. Whether this gap in female representation can be explained by a gender penalty female candidates face as the result of discrimination on the part of voters or campaign donors remains uncertain. In this paper, I estimate the gender penalty in U.S. House of Representative general elections using a regression discontinuity design (RDD). Using this RDD, I am able to assess whether chance nomination of female candidates to run in the general election affected the amount of campaign funds raised, general election vote share and probability of victory in House elections between 1982-2012. I find no evidence of a gender penalty using these measures. These results suggest that the deficit of female representation in the House is more likely the result of barriers to entering politics as opposed to overt gender discrimination by voters and campaign donors.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | Estimating the gender penalty in House of Representative elections using a regression discontinuity design |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | regression discontinuity design, gender gap, gender discrimination, elections, American politics, campaign funds, vote share, campaign donations, female candidates, House of Representatives |
Subjects: | C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C0 - General > C01 - Econometrics D - Microeconomics > D7 - Analysis of Collective Decision-Making > D72 - Political Processes: Rent-Seeking, Lobbying, Elections, Legislatures, and Voting Behavior J - Labor and Demographic Economics > J1 - Demographic Economics > J16 - Economics of Gender ; Non-labor Discrimination |
Item ID: | 71297 |
Depositing User: | Dr. Lefteris Anastasopoulos |
Date Deposited: | 15 May 2016 07:42 |
Last Modified: | 26 Sep 2019 17:09 |
References: | Sarah F. Anzia, Christopher R. Berry The Jackie (and Jill) Robinson effect: why do congresswomen outperform congressmen? Am. J. Political Sci., 55 (3) (2011), pp. 478–493 Adam Bonica Ideology and interests in the political marketplace Am. J. Political Sci., 57 (2) (2013), pp. 294–311 David E. Broockman Do female politicians empower women to vote or run for office? A regression discontinuity approach Elect. Stud., 34 (2014), pp. 190–204 Deborah Jordan Brooks He Runs, She Runs: Why Gender Stereotypes Do Not harm Women Candidates Princeton University Press (2013) Barbara Burrell A Woman's Place Is in the House University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor (1994) Barbara C. Burrell Women's and Men's campaigns for the US house of representatives, 1972-1982 A finance gap? Am. Polit. Res., 13 (3) (1985), pp. 251–272 Sebastian Calonico, Matias D. Cattaneo, Rocio Titiunik Robust nonparametric confidence intervals for regression-discontinuity designs Econometrica, 82 (6) (2014), pp. 2295–2326 Michael X Delli Carpini, Ester R. Fuchs The year of the woman? Candidates, voters, and the 1992 elections Political Sci. Q. (1993), pp. 29–36 Devin Caughey, Jasjeet S. Sekhon Elections and the regression discontinuity design: lessons from close us house races, 1942–2008 Polit. Anal., 19 (4) (2011), pp. 385–408 M.Y. Cheng, J. Fan, J.S. Marron On automatic boundary corrections Ann. Stat, 25 (4) (1997), pp. 1691–1708 Michael H. Crespin, Janna L. Dietz If you can't join ‘em, beat ‘em: the gender gap in individual donations to congressional candidates Political Research Quarterly, 63 (2010), pp. 581–593 Kirsten La Cour Dabelko, Paul S. Herrnson Women's and Men's campaigns for the US house of representatives Political Res. Q., 50 (1) (1997), pp. 121–135 Robert Darcy, Susan Welch, Janet Clark Women candidates in single and multi-member districts: American state legislative races Soc. Sci. Q. (1985), pp. 945–953 Kathleen Dolan Voting for women in the “year of the woman” Am. J. Political Sci. (1998), pp. 272–293 Kathleen Dolan Is there a gender affinity effect in American politics? Information, affect, and candidate sex in US House elections Political Res. Q., 61 (1) (2008), pp. 79–89 A.C. Eggers, A. Fowler, J. Hainmueller, A.B. Hall, J.M. Snyder On the validity of the regression discontinuity design for estimating electoral effects: new evidence from over 40,000 close races Am. J. Political Sci., 59 (1) (2014), pp. 259–274 Andrew C. Eggers, Jens Hainmueller MPs for sale? Returns to office in postwar British politics Am. Political Sci. Rev., 103 (04) (2009), pp. 513–533 Sarah A. Fulton Running backwards and in high heels the gendered quality gap and incumbent electoral success Political Res. Q., 65 (2) (2012), pp. 303–314 Andrew Gelman, Guido Imbens Why high-order polynomials should not be used in regression discontinuity designs Technical report National Bureau of Economic Research (2014) Elisabeth R. Gerber, Daniel J. Hopkins When mayors matter: estimating the impact of mayoral partisanship on city policy Am. J. Political Sci., 55 (2) (2011), pp. 326–339 Jinyong Hahn, Petra Todd, Wilbert Van der Klaauw Identification and estimation of treatment effects with a regression-discontinuity design Econometrica, 69 (1) (2001), pp. 201–209 Andrew B. Hall What happens when extremists win primaries? Am. Political Sci. Rev., 109 (01) (2015), pp. 18–42 A.B. Hall What happens when extremists win primaries? Am. Political Sci. Rev (2014) (Forthcoming) Paul S. Herrnson, J. Celeste Lay, Atiya Kai Stokes Women running as women: candidate gender, campaign issues, and voter-targeting strategies J. Polit., 65 (1) (2003), pp. 244–255 G.W. Imbens, T. Lemieux Regression discontinuity designs: a guide to practice J. Econom., 142 (2) (2008), pp. 615–635 Guido Imbens, Karthik Kalyanaraman Optimal bandwidth choice for the regression discontinuity estimator Rev. Econ. Stud. (2011), p. rdr043 Kim Fridkin Kahn Does being male help? An investigation of the effects of candidate gender and campaign coverage on evaluations of US Senate candidates J. Polit., 54 (02) (1992), pp. 497–517 Kim Fridkin Kahn The Political Consequences of Being a Woman (1996) Jennifer L. Lawless, Kathryn Pearson The primary reason for women's underrepresentation? Reevaluating the conventional wisdom J. Polit., 70 (01) (2008), pp. 67–82 David S. Lee Randomized experiments from non-random selection in US house elections J. Econ., 142 (2) (2008), pp. 675–697 David S. Lee, Thomas Lemieux Regression discontinuity designs in economics J. Econ. Lit., 48 (2010), pp. 281–355 Justin McCrary Manipulation of the running variable in the regression discontinuity design: a density test J. Econ., 142 (2) (2008), pp. 698–714 Monika L. McDermott Voting cues in low-information elections: candidate gender as a social information variable in contemporary United States elections Am. J. Political Sci. (1997), pp. 270–283 Jeffrey Milyo, Samantha Schosberg Gender bias and selection bias in House elections Public Choice, 105 (1–2) (2000), pp. 41–59 D.B. Rubin Causal inference using potential outcomes: design, modeling, decisions J. Am. Stat. Assoc, 100 (2005), pp. 322–331 Kira Sanbonmatsu Gender stereotypes and vote choice Am. J. Political Sci. (2002), pp. 20–34 Kira Sanbonmatsu, Kathleen Dolan Do gender stereotypes transcend party? Political Res. Q., 62 (3) (2009), pp. 485–494 Richard Seltzer, Jody Newman, Melissa Voorhees Leighton Sex as a Political Variable: Women as Candidates and Voters in US Elections Lynne Rienner Publishers (1997) Donald L. Thistlethwaite, Donald T. Campbell Regression-discontinuity analysis: an alternative to the ex post facto experiment J. Educ. Psychol., 51 (6) (1960), p. 309 Sue Thomas How Women Legislate Oxford University Press (1994) Carole Jean Uhlaner, Kay Lehman Schlozman Candidate gender and congressional campaign receipts J. Polit., 48 (01) (1986), pp. 30–50 |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/71297 |