The good, the bad and the ugly? Balancing environmental and economic impacts towards efficiency

Halkos, George and Polemis, Michael (2016): The good, the bad and the ugly? Balancing environmental and economic impacts towards efficiency.

Abstract

This paper estimates the efficiency of the power generation sector in the USA by using Window Data Envelopment Analysis (W-DEA). We integrate radial and non-radial efficiency measurements in DEA using the hybrid measure while we extend the proposed model by considering inputs and good and bad outputs as separable and non separable. Then in the second stage analysis we perform various econometric techniques (parametric and non-parametric) in order to model the relationship between the calculated environmental efficiencies and economic growth in attaining sustainability. Our empirical findings indicate an N-shape relationship between environmental efficiency and regional economic growth in the case of global and total pollutants but an inverted N-shape in the case of assessing local pollutants and using the appropriate dynamic specification. This implies that attention is required when considering local and global pollutants and the extracted environmental efficiencies.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: Energy; Efficiency; Sustainability; Window DEA; Electricity; EKC hypothesis; USA.
• Subjects: C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C2 - Single Equation Models ; Single Variables > C23 - Panel Data Models ; Spatio-temporal Models; C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C6 - Mathematical Methods ; Programming Models ; Mathematical and Simulation Modeling > C67 - Input-Output Models; O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O1 - Economic Development > O13 - Agriculture ; Natural Resources ; Energy ; Environment ; Other Primary Products; Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics ; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q0 - General > Q01 - Sustainable Development; Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics ; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q5 - Environmental Economics > Q53 - Air Pollution ; Water Pollution ; Noise ; Hazardous Waste ; Solid Waste ; Recycling; Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics ; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q5 - Environmental Economics > Q56 - Environment and Development ; Environment and Trade ; Sustainability ; Environmental Accounts and Accounting ; Environmental Equity ; Population Growth

References

Arellano M. (2003). Panel Data Econometrics. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK.

Arellano M. & Bond S. (1991). Some tests of specification for panel data: Monte carlo evidence and an application to employment equations. Review of Economic Studies, 582, 277-297.

Baltagi B.H. & Li D. (2002). Series estimation of partially linear panel data models with fixed effects. Annals of Economics and Finance, 3, 103-116.

Banker R.D., Charnes A. & Cooper W.W. (1984). Some Models for Estimating Technical and Scale Inefficiencies in Data Envelopment Analysis. Management Science, 30, 1078-1092.

Blundell R. & Bond S. (1998). Initial conditions and moment restrictions in dynamic panel data models. Journal of Econometrics, 87, 115–43.

Blundell R. & Bond S. (2000). GMM estimation with persistent panel data, an application to production functions. Econometric Reviews, 19, 321-340.

Brockmann M., Gasser T. & Herrmann E. (1993). Locally adaptive bandwidth choice for kernel regression estimators. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 88, 1302-1309.

Charnes A., Clark C.T., Cooper W.W. & Golany B. (1985). A development study of data envelopment analysis in measuring the efficiency of maintenance units in the U.S. Air Force. Annals of Operations Research, 2, 95-112.

Charnes A., Cooper W.W. & Rhodes E. (1978). Measuring the Efficiency of Decision Making Units. European Journal of Operational Research, 2, 429-444.

Chung Y.H., Fare R. & Grosskopf S. 1997. Productivity and undesirable outputs: a directional distance function approach. Journal of Environmental Management, 51, 229-240.

Cooper W.W., Seiford L.M. & Tone K. (2007). Data Envelopment Analysis: A comprehensive text with models, applications, references and DEA solver software. 2nd Edition, Springer.

Daraio C. & Simar L. (2005). Introducing environmental variables in nonparametric frontier models: a probabilistic approach. Journal of Productivity Analysis, 24, 93–121.

De Bruyn S. & Opschoor J. (1997). Developments in the throughput-income relationship: theoretical and empirical observations. Ecological Economics, 20(3), 255–268.

Dean J.M. (2002). Does trade liberalization harm the environment? A new test. Canadian Journal of Economics, 35(4), 819–842.

Dinda S. (2004). Environmental Kuznets Curve Hypothesis: A Survey. Ecological Economics, 49, 431-455.

Evangelinos K.I. & Halkos G.E. (2002). Implementation of environmental management systems standards: important factors in corporate decision making. Journal of Environmental Assessment Policy and Management, 4(3), 311-328

Fan J. & Gijbels I. (1995). Data-driven bandwidth selection in local polynomial fitting: variable bandwidth and spatial adaptation. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society B, 57, 371-394.

Färe R., Grosskopf S. & Kirley J. (2000). Multi-Output Capacity Measures and Their Relevance for Productivity, Bulletin of Economic Research, 52(2):101-112.  

Färe R., Grosskopf S. & Sancho H. (1999). Environmental performance: an index number approach. Department of Economics Working Paper, Oregon State University, Corvallis, Oregon.

Färe S., Grosskopf H., Lindgen B. & Roos P. (1989). Productivity change in Swedish hospitals: A Malmquist output index approach. In: Charnes A., Cooper W.W., Lewin A.Y. and Seiford L.M. (eds) Data Envelopment Analysis: Theory, Methodology and Applications, Boston, Kluwer Academic Publishers.

Färe R. & Grosskopf S. (2003). Non-parametric productivity analysis with undesirable outputs: comment. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 85, 1070–1074.

Färe R. & Grosskopf S. (2004). Modeling undesirable factors in efficiency evaluation: comment. European Journal of Operational Research, 157, 242-245.

Färe R. & Grosskopf S. (2009). A comment on weak disposability in nonparametric production analysis. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 91, 535–538.

Färe R., Grosskopf S. & Hernandez-Sancho F. (2004). Environmental performance: an Index number approach. Resource and Energy Economics, 26(4), 343-352.

Färe R., Grosskopf S., Lovell C.A.K. & Pasurka, C., 1989. Multilateral productivity comparisons when some outputs are undesirable. Review of Economics and Statistics, 71, 90–98.

Färe R., Grosskopf S. & Tyteca, D. (1996). An activity analysis model of the environment performance of firms: application to fossil-fuel-fired electric utilities. Ecological Economics, 18, 161-175.

Goto M. & Tsutsui M. (1998). Comparison of Productive and Cost Efficiencies among Japanese and US Electric Utilities. Omega, 26(2), 177-194

Halkos G.E. (2003). Environmental Kuznets Curve for sulfur: evidence using GMM estimation and random coefficient panel data models. Environment and Development Economics, 8(4), 581-601.

Halkos G.E. (2012). Environmental pollution and economic development: Explaining the existence of an environmental Kuznets curve. Journal of Applied Economic Sciences), 6(6(18), 148-159.

Halkos G.E. (2013). Exploring the economy–environment relationship in the case of sulphur emissions. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 56(2), 159- 177.

Halkos G.E. & Tzeremes N.G. (2009a). Exploring the existence of Kuznets curve in countries’ environmental efficiency using DEA window analysis. Ecological Economics, 68, 2168–2176.

Halkos G.E. & Tzeremes N.G. (2009b). Economic efficiency and growth in the EU enlargement. Journal of Policy Modeling, 31(6), 847-862.

Halkos G.E. & Tzeremes N.G (2013a). Economic growth and environmental efficiency: Evidence from US regions. Economics Letters, 20 (1), 48-52.

Halkos G.E. & Tzeremes N.G. (2013b). A conditional directional distance function approach for measuring regional environmental efficiency: Evidence from UK regions. European Journal of Operational Research, 227, 182–189.

Hausman J.A. & Ros A. (2013). An econometric assessment of telecommunications prices and consumer surplus in Mexico using panel data. Journal of Regulatory Economics, 43, 284–304.

IEA (2014). Energy Policies of IEA countries: The United States Review. International Energy Agency, Paris. OECD.

Jayanthakumaran K. & Liu Y. (2012). Openness and the Environmental Kuznets Curve: Evidence from China. Economic Modelling, 29, 566–576.

Lieb C.M. (2003). The Environmental Kuznets Curve: A survey of the empirical evidence and the possible causes. University of Heidelberg Depart of Economics, Discussion Paper Series No 391.

Kijima M., Nishide K. & Ohyama A. (2010) Economic models for the environmental Kuznets curve: A survey Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control 34, 1187–1201.

Koopmans T.C. (1951). An analysis of production as an efficient combination of activities. In: Koopmans, T. C. (Ed.): Activity Analysis of Production and Allocation, Proceeding of a Conference, pp.33-97, John Wiley and Sons Inc., London.

Kounetas. K. (2015). Heterogeneous technologies, strategic groups and environmental efficiency technology gaps for European countries, Energy Policy, 83(C), 277-287.

Kuosmanen T. (2005). Weak disposability in nonparametric productivity analysis with undesirable outputs. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 87, 1077-1082.

Maddison D (2006). Environmental Kuznets curves: A spatial econometric approach Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 51, 218–230.

Managi S. (2006). Are there increasing returns to pollution abatement? Empirical analytics of the Environmental Kuznets Curve in pesticides. Ecological Economics, 58, 617–636.

Millimet D., List J. & Stengos T. (2003). The Environmental Kuznets Curve: Real Progress or Misspecified Models?, The Review of Economics and Statistics, 85(4), 1038-1047.

Picazo-Tadeo A., Beltra-Esteve M. & Gomez-Limon J.A. (2012). Assessing eco-efficiency with directional distance functions. European Journal of Operational Research, 220, 798–809.

Picazo-Tadeo A. & Garcia-Reche A. (2007). What makes environmental performance differ between firms? Empirical evidence from the Spanish tile industry. Environment and Planning A, 39, 2232–2247.

Polemis M. (2016). New Evidence on the Impact of Structural Reforms on Electricity Sector Performance. Energy Policy, 92(C), 420-431.

Roodman D. (2009). How to do xtabond2: An introduction to difference and system GMM in Stata. Stata Journal, 9(1), 86-136.

Scheel H. (2001). Undesirable outputs in efficiency valuations. European Journal of Operations Research, 132, 400-410.

Seiford L.M. & Zhu J. (2002). Modelling undesirable factors in efficiency evaluations. European Journal of Operations Research, 142, 16-20.

Sengupta R.P. (1997). CO2 emission — income relationship: policy approach for climate control. Pacific Asia Journal of Energy, 7(2), 207–229.

Sueyoshi. T. & Goto M. (2013). Returns to scale vs. damages to scale in data envelopment analysis: An impact of U.S. clean air act on coal-fired power plants Omega, 41(2), 164-175.

Taskin F. & Zaim O. (2000). Searching for a Kuznets curve in environmental efficiency using kernel estimation. Economics Letters, 68(2), 217-223.

Taskin F. & Zaim O. (2001). The role of international trade on environmental efficiency: a DEA approach. Economic Modelling, 18, 1–17.

Tone K. (2004). A hybrid measure of efficiency in DEA. GRIPS Research Report Series I-2004-0003.

Tran K. & Tsionas E.G. (2010). Local GMM estimation of semiparametric panel data with smooth coefficient models, Econometric Reviews, 29(1), 39-61.

Tyteca D. (1996). On the measurement of the environmental performance of firms – a literature review and a productive efficiency perspective. Journal of Environmental Management, 46, 281–308.

Tyteca D. (1997). Linear programming models for the measurement of environmental performance of firms: concepts and empirical results. Journal of Productivity Analysis, 8, 175–189.

Vaninsky. A. (2006). Efficiency of electric power generation in the United States: Analysis and forecast based on data envelopment analysis. Energy Economics 28, 326–338

Yoruk B.K. & Zaim O. (2006). The Kuznets curve and the effect of international regulations on environmental efficiency. Economics Bulletin, 17, 1–7.

Zaim O. (2004). Measuring environmental performance of state manufacturing through changes in pollution intensities: a DEA framework Ecological Economics, 48, 37–47.

Zaim O., Färe R. & Grosskopf S. (2001). An economic approach to achievement and improvement indexes. Social Indicators Research, 56, 91–118.

Zaim O. (2004). Measuring environmental performance of state manufacturing through changes in pollution intensities: a DEA framework. Ecological Economics, 48, 37-47.

Zaim O. & Taskin F. (2000). A Kuznets curve in environmental efficiency: an application on OECD countries. Environmental and Resource Economics, 17, 21–36.

Zhang X.P., Cheng X.M., Yuan J.H. & Gao, X.J. (2011). Total-factor energy efficiency in developing countries. Energy Policy, 39, 644–650.

Zofio J.L. & Prieto A.M. (2001). Environmental efficiency and regulatory standards: the case of CO2 emissions from OECD industries. Resource and Energy Economics, 23, 63–83.