A Hedonic Output Index based Approach to Modeling Polluting Technologies

Malikov, Emir and Bokusheva, Raushan and Kumbhakar, Subal C. (2016): A Hedonic Output Index based Approach to Modeling Polluting Technologies. Forthcoming in: Empirical Economics

Abstract

Despite some recent criticisms, the conventional radial distance function, which treats undesirable by-products as either frontier shifters or inputs, remains a popular go-to formulation of polluting production processes among practitioners. This unfading popularity is arguably driven by the ability of radial distance functions, unlike alternative directional distance functions, to allow for unit-free multiplicative changes in arguments as well as, by implicitly postulating the radial direction, to free researchers from the dilemma of having to explicitly choose the directional vector. In this paper, we offer a generalization of the standard radial distance function to polluting technologies that can accommodate undesirable by-products in a more economically meaningful way. Specifically, we propose modeling undesirable outputs via a hedonic output index, which is meant to ensure that pollutants are treated as outputs, as opposed to inputs or theoretically unregulated frontier shifters, while also recognizing their undesirable nature. By using a radial input distance function generalized to encompass an (unobservable) hedonic output index of desirable and undesirable outputs, we are able to meaningfully describe relationships between different products (including the complementarity of desirable and undesirable outputs) within producible output sets as well as to represent technically feasible polluting production possibilities given inputs. An empirical application of our methodology to the case of Dutch dairy farms in 2001-2009 demonstrates the complexity of interactions between outputs, thereby attesting to the value of more elaborate representations of production possibilities.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: bad output, dairy production, input distance function, livestock, nitrogen pollution, shadow price
• Subjects: D - Microeconomics > D2 - Production and Organizations > D24 - Production ; Cost ; Capital ; Capital, Total Factor, and Multifactor Productivity ; Capacity; D - Microeconomics > D6 - Welfare Economics > D62 - Externalities; Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics ; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q1 - Agriculture > Q12 - Micro Analysis of Farm Firms, Farm Households, and Farm Input Markets

References

Assaf, A. G., Matousek, R., and Tsionas, E. G. (2013). Turkish bank efficiency: Bayesian estimation with undesirable outputs. Journal of Banking & Finance, 37:506-517.

Atkinson, S. E. and Dorfman, J. H. (2005). Bayesian measurement of productivity and efficiency in the presence of undesirable outputs: Crediting electric utilities for reducing air pollution. Journal of Econometrics, 126:445-468.

Barnett, W. A. (2002). Tastes and technology: Curvature is not sufficient for regularity. Journal of Econometrics, 108:199-202.

Barnett, W. A., Geweke, J., and Wolfe, M. (1991). Seminonparametric Bayesian estimation of the Asymptotically Ideal Production Model. Journal of Econometrics, 49:5-50.

Blackorby, C. and Russell, R. (1981). The Morishima elasticity of substitution: Symmetry, constancy, separability, and its relationship with the Hicks and Allen elasticities. Review of Economic Studies, 48:147-158.

Brummer, B., Glauben, T., and Thijssen, G. (2002). Decomposition of productivity growth using distance functions: The case of dairy farms in three European countries. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 84:628-644.

Chambers, R. G., Chung, Y., and Fare, R. (1998). Profit, directional distance functions, and Nerlovian efficiency. Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, 98:351-364.

Chung, Y., Fare, R., and Grosskopf, S. (1997). Productivity and undesirable outputs: A directional distance function approach. Journal of Environmental Management, 51:229-240.

Cuesta, R. A., Lovell, C. A. K., and Zofio, J. L. (2009). Environmental efficiency measurement with translog distance functions: A parametric approach. Ecological Economics, 68:2232-2242.

Emvalomatis, G., Stefanou, S. E., and Oude Lansink, A. (2011). A reduced-form model for dynamic efficiency measurement: Application to dairy farms in Germany and the Netherlands. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 93:161-174.

Fare, R., Grosskopf, S., Lovell, C. A. K., and Pasurka, C. (1989). Multilateral productivity comparisons when some outputs are undesirable: A nonparametric approach. Review of Economics and Statistics, 71:90-98.

Fare, R., Grosskopf, S., Lovell, C. A. K., and Yaisawarng, S. (1993). Derivation of shadow prices for undesirable outputs: A distance function approach. Review of Economics and Statistics, 75:374-380.

Fare, R., Grosskopf, S., Noh, D.-W., and Weber, W. (2005). Characteristics of a polluting technology: Theory and practice. Journal of Econometrics, 126:469-492.

Fare, R. and Primont, D. (1995). Multi-Output Production and Duality: Theory and Applications. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston, MA.

Fernandez, C., Koop, G., and Steel, M. F. J. (2002). Multiple-output production with undesirable outputs: An application to nitrogen surplus in agriculture. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 97(458):432-442.

Fernandez, C., Koop, G., and Steel, M. F. J. (2005). Alternative efficiency measures for multiple-output production. Journal of Econometrics, 126:411-444.

Hailu, A. and Veeman, T. S. (2000). Environmentally sensitive productivity analysis of the Canadian pulp and paper industry, 1959-1994: An input distance function approach. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 40:251-274.

Hailu, A. and Veeman, T. S. (2001). Non-parametric productivity analysis with undesirable outputs: An application to the Canadian pulp and paper industry. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 83:605-616.

Kumbhakar, S. C. and Lovell, C. A. K. (2000). Stochastic Frontier Analysis. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. Lange, K. (2004). Optimization (Springer Texts in Statistics). Springer, Verlag, NY.

Malikov, E., Kumbhakar, S. C., and Tsionas, E. G. (2015a). Bayesian approach to disentangling technical and environmental productivity. Econometrics, 3:443-465.

Malikov, E., Kumbhakar, S. C., and Tsionas, E. G. (2015b). A cost system approach to the stochastic directional technology distance function with undesirable outputs: The case of U.S. banks in 2001-2010. Journal of Applied Econometrics. forthcoming.

Murty, S., Russell, R. R., and Levkoff, S. B. (2012). On modeling pollution-generating technologies. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 64:117-135.

Olley, G. S. and Pakes, A. (1996). The dynamics of productivity in the telecommunications equipment industry. Econometrica, 64:1263-1297.

Reinhard, S., Lovell, C. A. K., and Thijssen, G. (1999). Econometric estimation of technical and environmental efficiency: An application to Dutch dairy farms. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 81:44-60.

Reinhard, S., Lovell, C. A. K., and Thijssen, G. (2000). Environmental efficiency with multiple environmentally detrimental variables; estimated with SFA and DEA. European Journal of Operational Research, 121:287-303.

Shephard, R. W. (1953). Cost and Production Functions. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.

Shephard, R. W. (1970). Theory of Cost and Production Functions. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.