Patents vs R&D Subsidies on Income Inequality

Chu, Angus C. and Cozzi, Guido (2016): Patents vs R&D Subsidies on Income Inequality.

Abstract

This study explores the effects of patent protection and R&D subsidies on economic growth and income inequality using a Schumpeterian growth model with heterogeneity in household asset holdings. We find that although strengthening patent protection and raising R&D subsidies have the same macroeconomic effect of stimulating economic growth, they have drastically different microeconomic implications on income inequality. Specifically, strengthening patent protection increases income inequality whereas raising R&D subsidies decreases (increases) it if the quality step size is sufficiently small (large). An empirically realistic quality step size is smaller than the threshold implying a negative effect of R&D subsidies on income inequality. We also calibrate the model to provide a quantitative analysis and find that strengthening patent protection causes a moderate increase in income inequality and a negligible increase in consumption inequality whereas raising R&D subsidies causes a significant decrease in both income inequality and consumption inequality.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: R&D subsidies, patents, income inequality, economic growth
• Subjects: D - Microeconomics > D3 - Distribution; O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O3 - Innovation ; Research and Development ; Technological Change ; Intellectual Property Rights; O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O4 - Economic Growth and Aggregate Productivity

References

Acemoglu, D., and Akcigit, U., 2012. Intellectual property rights policy, competition and innovation. Journal of the European Economic Association, 10, 1-42.

Adams, S., 2008. Globalization and income inequality: Implications for intellectual property rights. Journal of Policy Modeling, 30, 725--735.

Aghion, P., and Howitt, P., 1992. A model of growth through creative destruction. Econometrica, 60, 323-351.

Atkinson, A., 2000. The changing distribution of income: Evidence and explanations. German Economic Review, 1, 3-18.

Atkinson, A., 2003. Income inequality in OECD countries: Data and explanations. CESifo Economic Studies 49, 479-513.

Belo, F., Gala, V., and Li, J., 2013. Government spending, political cycles, and the cross section of stock returns. Journal of Financial Economics, 107, 305-324.

Chou, C.-F., and Talmain, G., 1996. Redistribution and growth: Pareto improvements. Journal of Economic Growth, 1, 505-523.

Chu, A., 2009. Effects of blocking patents on R&D: A quantitative DGE analysis. Journal of Economic Growth, 14, 55-78.

Chu, A., 2010. Effects of patent policy on income and consumption inequality in an R&D-based growth model. Southern Economic Journal, 77, 336-350.

Chu, A., 2011. The welfare cost of one-size-fits-all patent protection. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 35, 876-890.

Comin, D., 2004. R&D: A small contribution to productivity growth. Journal of Economic Growth, 9, 391-421.

Cozzi, G., 2007. The Arrow effect under competitive R&D. The B.E. Journal of Macroeconomics (Contributions), 7, Article 2.

Cozzi, G., Giordani, P., and Zamparelli, L., 2007. The refoundation of the symmetric equilibrium in Schumpeterian growth models. Journal of Economic Theory, 136, 788-797.

Foellmi, R., and Zweimuller, J., 2006. Income distribution and demand-induced innovations. Review of Economic Studies, 73, 941-960.

Furukawa, Y., 2007. The protection of intellectual property rights and endogenous growth: Is stronger always better?. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 31, 3644-3670.

Futagami, K., and Iwaisako, T., 2007. Dynamic analysis of patent policy in an endogenous growth model. Journal of Economic Theory, 132, 306-334.

Gilbert, R., and Shapiro, C., 1990. Optimal patent length and breadth. RAND Journal of Economics, 21, 106-112.

Ginarte, J., and Park, W., 1997. Determinants of patent rights: A cross-national study. Research Policy, 26, 283-301.

Grossman, G., and Helpman, E., 1991. Quality ladders in the theory of growth. Review of Economic Studies, 58, 43-61.

Horii, R., and Iwaisako, T., 2007. Economic growth with imperfect protection of intellectual property rights. Journal of Economics, 90, 45-85.

Impullitti, G., 2010. International competition and U.S. R&D subsidies: A quantitative welfare analysis. International Economic Review, 51, 1127-1158.

Iwaisako, T., and Futagami, K., 2013. Patent protection, capital accumulation, and economic growth. Economic Theory, 52, 631-668.

Jones, C., and Kim, J., 2014. A Schumpeterian model of top income inequality. NBER Working Paper No. 20637.

Li, C.-W., 1998. Inequality and growth: a Schumpeterian perspective. Unpublished paper, University of Glasgow.

Li, C.-W., 2001. On the policy implications of endogenous technological progress. Economic Journal, 111, C164-C179.

Lin, H., 2002. Shall the Northern optimal R&D subsidy rate inversely respond to Southern intellectual property protection?. Southern Economic Journal, 69, 381-397.

Lin, H., 2015. Creative destruction and optimal patent life in a variety-expansion growth model. Southern Economic Journal, 81, 803-828.

Nakamura, L., 2003. A trillion dollars a year in intangible investment and the new economy. In Intangible Assets: Values, Measures, and Risks, edited by J. Hand and B. Lev. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 19-47.

Peretto, P., 1998. Technological change and population growth. Journal of Economic Growth, 3, 283-311.

Piketty, T., 2014. Capital in the Twenty-First Century. Harvard University Press.

Reed, D., and Cancian, M., 2001. Sources of inequality: Measuring the contributions of income sources to rising family income inequality. Review of Income and Wealth, 47, 321-33.

Rivera-Batiz, L., and Romer, P., 1991. Economic integration and endogenous growth. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 106, 531-555.

Romer, P., 1990. Endogenous technological change. Journal of Political Economy, 98, S71-S102.

Segerstrom, P., Anant, T., and Dinopoulos, E., 1990. A Schumpeterian model of the product life cycle. American Economic Review, 80, 1077-91.

Venturini, F., 2012. Looking into the black box of Schumpeterian growth theories: An empirical assessment of R&D races. European Economic Review, 56, 1530-1545.

Zeng, J., and Zhang, J., 2007. Subsidies in an R&D growth model with elastic labor. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 31, 861-886.

Zeng, J., Zhang, J., and Fung, M., 2014. Patents and price regulation in an R&D growth model. Macroeconomic Dynamics, 18, 1-22.

Zweimuller, J., 2000. Schumpeterian entrepreneurs meet Engel's law: The impact of inequality on innovation-driven growth. Journal of Economic Growth, 5, 185-206.