Chiappinelli, Olga (2016): Political corruption in the execution of public contracts.
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_73487.pdf Download (539kB) | Preview |
Abstract
This paper presents a novel theory of corruption in public procurement. It considers an agency setting of contract execution where the principal is a politician who can commit to a contract auditing policy. It is found that a benevolent politician, by choosing a sufficiently strict auditing, deters the contracting firm from padding costs; conversely, a selfish politician chooses a relatively lax auditing in order to create an incentive for cost-padding, and engages in corruption with the firm in case of detection. If the cost of auditing is high enough, even a benevolent politician might prefer to allow cost-padding.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | Political corruption in the execution of public contracts |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | Corruption in procurement; Cost-padding; Selfish politician; Endogenous auditing; Procurement contracts; Principal-agent model. |
Subjects: | D - Microeconomics > D7 - Analysis of Collective Decision-Making > D73 - Bureaucracy ; Administrative Processes in Public Organizations ; Corruption D - Microeconomics > D8 - Information, Knowledge, and Uncertainty > D82 - Asymmetric and Private Information ; Mechanism Design L - Industrial Organization > L5 - Regulation and Industrial Policy > L51 - Economics of Regulation |
Item ID: | 73487 |
Depositing User: | Olga Chiappinelli |
Date Deposited: | 03 Sep 2016 15:28 |
Last Modified: | 26 Sep 2019 10:15 |
References: | 1) Acemoglu, D. (2010). Institutions, factor prices, and taxation: Virtues of strong states? American Economic Review, 100(2):115-19. 2) Acemoglu, D., Egorov, G., and Sonin, K. (2013). A political theory of populism. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 128(2):771-805. 3) Acemoglu, D., Ticchi, D., and Vindigni, A. (2011). Emergence and persistence of inefficient states. Journal of the European Economic Association, 9(2):177-208. 4) Acemoglu, D. and Verdier, T. (2000). The choice between market failures and corruption. American Economic Review, 90(1):194-211. 5) Aidt, T. (2003). Economic analysis of corruption: a survey. Economic Journal, 113(491):F632-F652. 6) Alesina, A. and Tabellini, G. (2007). Bureaucrats or politicians? part i: A single policy task. American Economic Review, 97(1):169-179. 7) Alesina, A. and Tabellini, G. (2008). Bureaucrats or politicians? part ii: Multiple policy tasks. Journal of Public Economics, 92(3-4):426-447. 8) Auriol, E. (2006). Corruption in procurement and public purchase. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 24(5):867-885. 9) Bandiera, O., Prat, A., and Valletti, T. (2009). Active and passive waste in government spending: Evidence from a policy experiment. American Economic Review, 99(4):1278-1308. 10) Banfield, E. C. (1975). Corruption as a feature of governmental organization. Journal of Law and Economics, 18(3):587-605. 11) Baron, D. P. and Besanko, D. (1984). Regulation, asymmetric information, and auditing. RAND Journal of Economics, 15(4):447-470. 12) Baron, D. P. and Myerson, R. B. (1982). Regulating a monopolist with unknown costs. Econometrica, 50(4):911-30. 13) Barro, R. (1973). The control of politicians: An economic model. Public Choice, 14(1):19-42. 14) Becker, G. S. and Stigler, G. J. (1974). Law enforcement, malfeasance, and compensation of enforcers. The Journal of Legal Studies, 3(1):1-18. 15) Benabou, R. and Tirole, J. (2002). Self-confidence and personal motivation. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 117(3):871-915. 16) Benabou, R. and Tirole, J. (2003). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation. Review of Economic Studies, 70(3):489-520. 17) Benabou, R. and Tirole, J. (2006). Belief in a just world and redistributive politics. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 121(2):699-746. 18) Besley, T. (2007). Principled agents?: The political economy of good government. OUP Catalogue. 19) Besley, T. and Persson, T. (2009). The origins of state capacity: Property rights, taxation, and politics. American Economic Review, 99(4):1218-44. 20) Besley, T. and Persson, T. (2010). State capacity, conflict, and development. Econometrica, 78(1):1-34. 21)Boehm, F. and Olaya, J. (2006). Corruption in public contracting auctions: The role of transparency in bidding processes. Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, 77(4):431-452. 22) Bolton, P. and Dewatripont, M. (2005). Contract theory. MIT press. 23) Bougheas, S. and Worrall, T. (2012). Cost padding in regulated monopolies. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 30(4):331-341. 24) Buchanan, J. and Tullock, G. (1962). The calculus of consent: Logical foundations of constitutional democracy. University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor. 25) Burguet, R. and Che, Y.-K. (2004). Competitive procurement with corruption. RAND Journal of Economics, 35(1):50-68. 26) Burguet, R. and Perry, M. K. (2007). Bribery and favoritism by auctioneers in sealed-bid auctions. The B.E. Journal of Theoretical Economics, 7(1):1-27. 27) Celentani, M. and Ganuza, J.-J. (2002). Corruption and competition in procurement. European Economic Review, 46(7):1273-1303. 28) Chu, L. Y. and Sappington, D. E. (2007). A note on optimal procurement contracts with limited direct cost in ation. Journal of Economic Theory, 137(1):745-753. 29) Compte, O., Lambert-Mogiliansky, A., and Verdier, T. A. (2005). Corruption and competition in procurement auctions. RAND Journal of Economics, 36(1):1-15. 30) Coviello, D. and Gagliarducci, S. (2010). Building political collusion: Evidence from procurement auctions. IZA Discussion Papers 4939, Institute for the Study of Labor (IZA). 31) Dhami, S. and Al-Nowaihi, A. (2007). Corruption and the provision of public output in a hierarchical asymmetric information relationship. Journal of Public Economic Theory, 9(4):727-755. 32) Di Tella, R. and Schargrodsky, E. (2003). The role of wages and auditing during a crackdown on corruption in the city of buenos aires. Journal of Law and Economics, 46(1):269-292. 33) Dimitri, N., Dini, F., and Piga, G. (2006). When should procurement be centralized? In N. Dimitri, G. and G.Spagnolo, editors, Handbook of Procurement, pages 47-81. Cambridge University Press. 34)Dittmann, I. (2006). The optimal use of fines and imprisonment if governments do not maximize welfare. Journal of Public Economic Theory, 8(4):677-695. 35) Ferejohn, J. (1986). Incumbent performance and electoral control. Public Choice, 50(1):5-25. 36) Garoupa, N. and Klerman, D. (2002). Optimal law enforcement with a rent-seeking government. American Law and Economics Review, 4(1):116-140. 37) Golden, M. A. and Picci, L. (2005). Proposal for a new measure of corruption, illustrated with italian data. Economics & Politics, 17(1):37-75. 38) Goldman, E., Rocholl, J., and So, J. (2013). Politically connected boards of directors and the allocation of procurement contracts. Review of Finance, 17(5):1617-1648. 39) Gradstein, M. (1993). Rent seeking and the provision of public goods. The Economic Journal, 103(420):pp. 1236-1243. 40) Grossman, G. M. and Helpman, E. (1994). Protection for sale. American Economic Review, 84(4):833-850. 41) Grossman, G. M. and Helpman, E. (2002). Special interest politics. MIT press. 42) Guasch, J. L. and Straub, S. (2009). Corruption and concession renegotiations.: Evidence from the water and transport sectors in latin america. Utilities Policy, 17(2):185-190. Corruption and Infrastructure Services. 43) Iossa, E. and Martimort, D. (2013). Corruption in public-private partnerships. In de Vries, P. and Yehoue, E., editors, The Routledge Companion to Public-Private Partnerships, pages 207-224. Routledge. 44)Iossa, E. and Martimort, D. (2014). Corruption in ppps, incentives and contract incompleteness. CEIS Research Paper 317, Tor Vergata University, CEIS. 45) Khalil, F. and Lawarree, J. (1995). Collusive auditors. The American Economic Review, 85(2):442-446. 46) Klitgaard, R. (1988). Controlling Corruption. University of California Press. 47) Kofman, F. and Lawarree, J. (1996). On the optimality of allowing collusion. Journal of Public Economics, 61(3):383-407. 48) Laffont, J.-J. and Tirole, J. (1986). Using cost observation to regulate firms. Journal of Political Economy, 94(3):614-641. 49) Laffont, J.-J. and Tirole, J. (1991). Auction design and favoritism. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 9(1):9-42. 50) Laffont, J.-J. and Tirole, J. (1993). A Theory of Incentives in Procurement and Regulation, volume 12 of MIT Press Books. The MIT Press. 51) Laffont, J.-J. and Tirole, J. (2002). The Theory of Incentives: The Principal-Agent Model. Princeton University Press. 52) Lengwiler, Y. and Wolfstetter, E. G. (2006). Corruption in procurement auctions. In N. Dimitri, G. and G.Spagnolo, editors, Handbook of Procurement, pages 412-429. Cambridge University Press. 53) Maskin, E. and Riley, J. (1984). Monopoly with incomplete information. RAND Journal of Economics, 15(2):171-196. 54) Mookherjee, D. and Png, I. P. L. (1995). Corruptible law enforcers: How should they be compensated? Economic Journal, 105(428):145-59. 55) OECD (2006). Transparency and accountability as tools for promoting integrity and preventing corruption in procurement: Possibilities and limitations. OECD Papers Vol. 5/10, OECD. 56) OECD (2007). Bribery in public procurement: Methods, actors and counter-measures. 57) Osborne, M. J. and Rubinstein, A. (1994). A Course in Game Theory. The MIT Press. 58) Persson, T. and Tabellini, G. (2000). Political Economics. Explaining Economic Policy. MIT press. 59) Piga, G. (2011). A fighting chance against corruption in public procurement? In Soreide, T. and Rose-Ackerman, S., editors, International Handbook on the Economics of Corruption, volume 2. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham. 60) Polinsky, A. M. and Shavell, S. (2001). Corruption and optimal law enforcement. Journal of Public Economics, 81(1):1-24. 61) Rose-Ackerman, S. (1975). The economics of corruption. Journal of Public Economics, 4(2):187-203. 62) Rose-Ackerman, S. (1999). Corruption and Government: Causes, Consequences, and Reform. Cambridge University Press. 63) Shapiro, C. and Willig, R. D. (1990). Economic rationales for the scope of privatization. In Suleimann, E. and Waterbury, J., editors, The Political Economy of Public Sector Reform and Privatization, pages 55{87. Oxford, Press. 64) Shleifer, A. and Vishny, R. W. (1993). Corruption. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 108(3):599-617. 65) Soreide, T. (2005). Grey zones and corruption in public procurement: Issues for consideration. In OECD, editor, Fighting Corruption and Promoting Integrity in Public Procurement. Oxford, Westview Press. 66) Tirole, J. (1992). Collusion and the theory of organizations. In Laffont, J., editor, Advances of Economic Theory, Sixth World Congress, vol. 2, pages 151-213. Cambridge University Press. 67) Transparency International,(2006). Handbook for curbing corruption in public procurement. Technical report, Transparency International. 68) Ware, G. T., Moss, S., Campos, E., and Noone, G. (2007). Corruption in public procurement: a perennial challenge. In Campos, E. and Pradhan, S., editors, The Many Faces of Corruption: Tracking Vulnerabilities at the Sector Level, pages 295{334. The World Bank, Washington, DC. |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/73487 |